Healing – Resisting internalised ableism

In the Western Educated Industrialised Rich Democratic (WEIRD) world we live in what philosopher Guy Debord attempted to describe as The Society of the Spectacle. The reality presented to us via the media and public social media has been engineered to fit the exacting standards of Homo Economicus®. All the people alive today in Westernised countries, i.e. all the people in WEIRD countries and in the countries aspiring to WEIRD standards, have been born into The WEIRD Spectacle of internalised ableism. 

Internalised ableism

The less WEIRD a country, the lower the fidelity of The Spectacle, and the more there is still some room for life beyond The Spectacle. I have lived all my life in The Spectacle, in the ruins of the WEIRD empire. I also call it the WEIRDT empire: Western Educated Industrialised Rich Democratic Theatre. Everything in this theatre is about perception – there is very little substance or connection to the biophysical and ecological context outside the theatre.

The institutions of the WEIRDT empire pretend that all aspects of life can be categorised and understood in terms of normality – by the hump of the bell curve.

But the living planet does not conform to anthropocentric normality, it is chaotic, it is beautifully and awesomely diverse. Like many neurodivergent people, I am highly sensitised to the language people use, in particular to the semantic possibility space that is created and bounded by the use of specific terms and by the conscious avoidance of other terms. In WEIRD politics the language of economic growth and war dominates. Growth economics is a euphemism for neocolonialism, genocide, and ecocide. Only 100 years ago, barely anyone was writing about the “need” for “economic growth”.

The most deadly wars today are economic wars. Social inequalities, in particular unequal access to high quality healthcare and lack of access to healthy ways of life result in a rise in chronic diseases, a several-fold increase in the risks of global pandemics, and in the premature death of millions.

My Autistic mind compels me to reduce cognitive dissonance. If I leave cognitive dissonance to fester, it promptly generates migraines or other symptoms of physical disease. Via my work, usually in the transdisciplinary context of small groups of people with complementary domain specific expertise, I have learned to ask clarifying questions and to ask for examples, and zero in on potential misunderstandings and ambiguities. This co-creates bridges of shared understanding across discipline and domain boundaries, which are essential for anyone who attempts to do anything that (re)connects us to Gaia, i.e. to the sacred living world beyond The WEIRD Spectacle. 

I was fortunate to have been exposed to the foundations of logic, i.e. the foundations of philosophy, and then studied mathematical thinking tools for four years before becoming exposed to the commercial world of The Spectacle.

Indoctrination

By the time I was born, the anthropocentric WEIRD Spectacle manifested in terms of neocolonialism. It is fascinating to look back and reflect on how effective the indoctrination is. I grew up as a WEIRD alien, immersed in less WEIRD cultures within the ruins of the British Empire. This left cracks in my WEIRD indoctrination, and later it helped me to put my education to good use in terms of critical thinking tools and habits.

George Orwell had a somewhat similar background to mine in an earlier time. The above biographical clip is worthwhile listening to – ignore the embedded cringe-inducing commercial promotion. The conclusion is directly relevant to our times.

Once we appreciate that even our “educated” Western scientific worldview is not free from ideological bias, we can develop a better conceptual model of how individual and collective human belief systems and related bodies of knowledge evolve. It is helpful to distinguish the following categories of beliefs and related knowledge:

  1. Beliefs based on scientific theories backed by empirical evidence that we are intimately familiar with. Such beliefs may be affected by paradigmatic bias and the quality or bias inherent in the supporting evidence. We need to be cognisant of corresponding blind spots in our understanding of the world when applying such beliefs in our reasoning. Only a small minority of our beliefs fall into this category.
  2. Beliefs based on scientific theories backed by empirical evidence that we are not intimately familiar with. Such beliefs may be affected by paradigmatic bias and the quality or bias inherent in the supporting evidence. We have no idea of the potential blind spots in our understanding of the world when applying such beliefs in our reasoning. In the few cases where the theories have been developed by trusted friends and colleagues within our personal competency network, we can decide to rely on their understanding of the limits of applicability and potential blind spots. If we are “educated”, a sizeable minority of our beliefs fall into this category.
  3. Beliefs based on personal experiences and observations. We know that no human can maintain more than 150 relationships with other people, and that all our assumptions about the lives and needs of humans are based on the very small set of people that we relate to. For those who identify as autistic, a significant number of beliefs held fall into this category. By definition, we don’t understand all the people that we “don’t relate to”. Thus, making any decisions that potentially affect the lives of many hundred to several billion people without explicit consent of all those potentially affected (a daily occurrence in government institutions and corporations), must be considered the pinnacle of human ignorance.
  4. Beliefs that represent explicit social agreements between specific people regarding communication and collaboration. Such sacred commitments can be verbal or in writing, and they only scale up to the limited numbers of relationships that we can maintain. As needed we can jointly update these commitments to reflect evolving needs or constraints in the wider ecology we are embedded in. For those who identify as Autistic, a significant number of beliefs held fall into this category, especially agreements with family members, friends, and colleagues. In hierarchically structured societies, agreements such as laws issued by regional or national authorities apply to large groups of people, and by necessity have been developed with limited input from those who are affected. Such agreements invariably cause untold harm that for the most part remains invisible to the authorities. Humans did not evolve to live in hierarchically structured super-human scale societies. Pretending that we can maintain such structures without causing untold harm is a form of anthropocentric hubris.
  5. Beliefs based on what others have told us and what we have been encouraged to believe by parents, teachers, and friends, … and politicians and advertisers, including beliefs that we have absorbed from our social environment subconsciously, i.e. beliefs for which we can’t recall the origin. For those who do not identify as Autistic, the majority of beliefs held may fall into this category.

All categories of human beliefs are associated with some level of uncertainty regarding the validity and applicability to a specific context at hand. A belief in the universally competitive nature of humans clearly falls into the fifth category. When beliefs related to neoliberal ideology are reflected in laws (category 4. above), they are internalised as cultural norms by large parts of the population, and when the externalities of hyper-competitive profit maximising behaviour hit with full force, Homo Economicus® has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

I was employed for 13 years before I could no longer bear to be part of The Spectacle of the corporate world, which is an Orwellian world of social perception management. The Spectacle is not survivable for sensitive neurodivergent people who are unable to maintain “quasi unlimited” levels of cognitive dissonance on an ongoing basis.

WEIRD indoctrination and enculturation in cruelty and violence goes very deep. I remember being taught at home and in school in the 1970s that animals can’t have “thoughts”, and that any feelings or consciousness they may have are not in any way comparable to human lived experiences. This was taught to us as “science” in biology classes. To top it off, in middle school we learned how to dissect dead frogs and we were given live laboratory mice to conduct experiments with. It tells us something about so-called WEIRD “normality” that such experiences remain etched into our memories, and that we can’t ever unsee or unlearn them. 

Deep down we know we are part of Gaia. This is why we enjoy immersing ourselves in the natural world. This is why we are able to build mutual trust with non-human animals, including wild animals. Living beings recognise each other as being part of the sacred cycle of life. We know that each living being enjoys being alive and enjoys exploring the world. Of course as humans we most deeply relate to animals that are roughly human scale – it is at that scale that we can communicate, and, if we take the time, build genuine relationships across species, from domesticated animals to wild birds, octopuses, fish, and mammals of all kinds. 

When animals eat other animals, it is only to cover their basic survival needs. Humans have the same inhibitions. We evolved to know intuitively that all lives and all our relationships are sacred. The human capacity for culture and spoken language evolved on top of this biological backdrop. This is something that to this day is not part of the WEIRD indoctrination system – because it clashes with the WEIRD neocolonial narrative of technological progress. 

The WEIRD indoctrination system makes sure that all children are indoctrinated in Homo Economicus® from a very young age, before we learn anything substantial about Gaia and the living world. This is possibly the most cruel, dehumanising, and life denying part of WEIRD cultures. 

The pill of Homo Economicus® is sweetened by punishing children with rewards for compliance. In this way children learn to collaborate only to compete. 

“Pay for merit, pay for what you get, reward performance. Sounds great, can’t be done. Unfortunately it can not be done, on short range. After 10 years perhaps, 20 years, yes. The effect is devastating. People must have something to show, something to count. In other words, the merit system nourishes short-term performance. It annihilates long-term planning. It annihilates teamwork. People can not work together. To get promotion you’ve got to get ahead. By working with a team, you help other people. You may help yourself equally, but you don’t get ahead by being equal, you get ahead by being ahead. Produce something more, have more to show, more to count. Teamwork means work together, hear everybody’s ideas, fill in for other people’s weaknesses, acknowledge their strengths. Work together. This is impossible under the merit rating / review of performance system. People are afraid. They are in fear. They work in fear. They can not contribute to the company as they would wish to contribute. This holds at all levels. But there is something worse than all of that. When the annual ratings are given out, people are bitter. They can not understand why they are not rated high. And there is a good reason not to understand. Because I could show you with a bit of time that it is purely a lottery.”

W Edwards Deming (1984)

If we learn about Homo Economicus® before we are encouraged to listen deeply to our intuition, and before we learn about Gaia and collaborative ecological niche construction within and between species, then we are primed to view any other narrative that deviates from or that contradicts Homo Economicus® with suspicion. In the commercial digital world of Homo Economicus®, where the very means of communication have been seized by corporations, and where universities have become dependent on corporate funding, it has become easy to sideline the growing body of scientific evidence that contradicts Homo Economicus®. 

Since we are immersed in information overload, evidence such as what we know about the innate collaborative inclinations and sense of fairness of human toddlers and about the pivotal role of highly egalitarian societies in the evolution of the human capacity for language and culture does not even need to be hidden. It is completely sufficient for algorithms and institutions to deprioritise such evidence.

I am learning that not only have humans lived in highly egalitarian human scale bands for most of 300,000 years, but also that such bands maintained ongoing collaborative and dynamically evolving relationships with other bands across large bioregions, routinely coming together for omni-directional learning. Amongst other things such gatherings also allowed new groups to form. Apparently it was common for families or individuals to join another group. Important to note the absence of a hierarchical super-structure between groups, and the dynamism of ongoing relationships between groups.

All of this fits well with my own experience with egalitarian human scale worker coops, and with the interest from other small groups of neurodivergent and disabled people in adopting a similar model, including ongoing collaboration between groups.

We still have access to all our innate collaborative capabilities. If we care to listen to our guts, hearts, and minds, we can (re)learn everything we need for co-creating ecologies of care beyond the human.

The ripples of collaborative niche construction and intersectional solidarity are spreading. More and more small cosmo-local bands of marginalised people are coming together to catalyse intersectional solidarity.

Actually, the WEIRD empire is not in control. Gaia has a perfect 10,000 year track record of clamping down on anthropocentric empire building attempts, making room for new forms of life to emerge from the compost heap. She is probably asking herself in some planetary language that is beyond human comprehensibility: Can this species recover from cultural cancer? Data from climate science and biodiversity research gives us a glimpse of Gaia’s language.

Healthy human scale cultural development

At least some of the developmental patterns of cells and organs within insects seem to translate to the developmental stages and metamorphosis of healthy human cultures. The world of insect metamorphosis is amazing. The big cycle of life within Gaia is fractal, very similar phenomena reoccur at very different scale and in different contexts. In this case patterns at level of cells and organs within a metamorphosing insect seem to reoccur at the level of human scale cultural development.

The more I learn about this topic and weave it together with anthropological evidence, and with experiences from worker coops of neurodivergent and otherwise disabled people, the more I get the impression that Homo Economicus® relates to a cancer that has arrested the development of human cultural organisms at the larval stage, resulting in a perpetual production of growth hormones. 

Humans need to (re)learn how to stop perpetuating hierarchically structured systems of social control, striving for infinite growth like a cancer. We also need to (re)learn how to reproduce and evolve peacefully, along the lines of what we know about the ongoing lifetime collaborative relationships and some of the amazing conflict resolution strategies practiced within and between hunter gatherer bands. 

The global mono-cult is an empire that has the developmental maturity of a teenager. An individual human that keeps eating like a teenager will become morbidly obese, develop chronic diseases, and end up dying prematurely. 

The Pentagon Wars is the favourite movie of one of my former Autistic colleagues who spent many years in large government departments. This movie, which is based on a true story, is a good illustration of the teenage stage of cultural development in WEIRD societies. Given all the deadly wars that are in progress and that have been stoked for decades, this movie is too painfully close to reality for me to genuinely enjoy.

We need to learn how to deactivate the growth hormone of Homo Economicus®, which is capital constructed as interest-bearing debt. Gaia is showing us all the examples we need for fully rejoining the sacred cycle of life. 

The challenge of deactivating the growth hormone of Homo Economicus® is not a new one. It is an instance of the same Homo Empire® challenge faced by the inmates of the warring states in what is now China over 2,000 years ago. Hence my appreciation for the timeless wisdom embedded in Daoist philosophy.

All indigenous cultures honour Gaia. They all operate on time horizons that span at least 7 generations into the future, and draw on collective knowledge and wisdom that extends at least 7 generations into the past. How does this compare to the WEIRD addiction to quarterly results and infinite growth?

Every human is a uniquely valuable repository of lived experience and insights.

Dialogues are uniquely valuable, they allow us to walk each others minds, and via clarifying questions and other thinking tools, we converge on shared understanding and shared mental models for specific domains or experiences. Linear language is a poor communication tool, but dialogue transforms it into a very powerful communication and collaboration tool. 

Of course dialogues only catalyse shared understanding when sharing freely and honestly, and it fails miserably as soon as one or both parties have any hidden self-serving agenda – which is the default in the world of Homo Economicus®. This is why I am incapable of buying into the competitive “logic” of markets.

Institutionalised learning disability

Institutionalised social power is the privilege of not needing to learn, it leads to collective stupidity, it is a form of collective learning disability.

Markets invariably generate collective stupidity, because by definition participants have incentives not to share unlimited amounts of information. By definition, unconstrained markets are the anti-thesis of collaborative niche construction.

There are encouraging signs in some less WEIRD, and more communally oriented societies. By WEIRD standards Japan is an economic basket case, with a shrinking and ageing population, and a GDP growth that is probably averaging around zero over the last 20 years. We need to hear more stories from the less WEIRD world to understand what modern life can be like in a context of shrinking economic busyness, shrinking population, and correspondingly shrinking ecological footprint.

Such examples illustrate how the growth hormone of Homo Economicus® can be deactivated. The referenced example also illustrates the significance of small scale autonomous local communal decision making, which is the opposite of the centralised models that still operate in the ruins of the British Empire. There is no need at all for glorious leaders. Acknowledging the extent of the cultural cancer is going to be hard for some people to swallow. Patriotism and professionalism are key ingredients of fascism.

Too many professionals have “only been doing their job” and have been following “orders” or “best practices” for too long, without listening deeply to their innate ethical compass, which has been systematically and thoroughly suppressed by the WEIRD indoctrination system.

  1. The biggest fears of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people relate to unmet healthcare needs, their work environment, their parents, and disrespect by healthcare professionals. Data from our participatory research shows the large overlap and the intersectionality between Autistic communities, and the LGBTQIA+ and Disabled communities.
  2. Results from our survey on psychological safety and mental wellbeing indicate that the biggest fears of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+, and Disabled children – and especially those who also belong to cultural minorities, relate to classmates, parents, and teachers. 97% indicate often or always having anxiety, and 80% indicate often or always feeling depressed.
  3. Our individually unique nervous systems and sensitivities develop and evolve over the course of our lives. 85% of neurodivergent adults often or always feel overwhelmed and misunderstood, and over 60% often or always feel disrespected and unsafe. Our overall sense of wellbeing is determined by alignment between our sensitivity profiles and the ecology of care we are embedded in (or not).

Advocating for a “better” command and control hierarchy is no solution, it only sows the seeds for yet another empire building attempt. Collectively we can work towards revoking the social license for maintaining and strengthening life destroying powered-up institutions.

Sensitive Daoist thinkers saw this clearly over 2,000 years ago. The documentaries by British film maker Adam Curtis are also excellent educational resources for those who have the stomach to face the reality of toxic cultural inertia.

Full economic eclipse

In-depth discussions of Adam Curtis’ Hypernormalisation and Century of the Self should be part of every high school curriculum, and they should be mandatory menu items in the curriculum of medical schools and all other institutions entrusted with any aspect of human wellbeing.

Acknowledging reality is only the first step. Economic eclipse is a product of many decades of WEIRD indoctrination and propaganda. Gaia is nowhere to be seen:

Economic eclipse has been causing untold harm for decades, and it inevitably ends in economic collapse. As we are collectively moving out of full economic eclipse, the beauty of Gaia as well as the delusion of hypernormality is revealed. Sobering up is going to be painful for the addicts who remain in denial.

Capital is not a hand that feeds, it is a drug that kills. Gaia has nurtured and fed humans for 300,000 years.

We need commitment, we need community. We need to create spaces of trust. But for that, there’s tremendous work that we need to be doing. But I don’t think that any of that work will be possible, should we not have that commitment–that commitment that no matter how challenging and tremendously difficult it will be to reckon with these narratives and to dismantle these narratives. Because seeing the horror in the eye of all these narratives that we live by comes with tremendous understanding. It will leave us very fragile, very vulnerable, and most, of course, are not willing to do that, because we don’t feel safe. But if we are able to stand the heat and create these spaces, if we commit to do this kind of work for the benefit of the planet, then we may be able to learn that we can fly.

Yuria Celidwen

This is the voice of Gaia, exposing the life denying doctrine of Homo Economicus®:

We deeply appreciate the wonder of life, and we can clearly see the global mono-cult for what it is. We are fully human. We are alive.

Knowing a bit about all of the above may help you to remain sane, and to see, enjoy, and where possible, nurture the growing cracks in The WEIRD Spectacle. Most importantly, we must acknowledge that we can not regain sobriety alone, in self-isolation, and we can only relearn to be fully human at a scale that is compatible with our biological cognitive and emotional limits, neither at smaller scales, nor at larger scales.

Healing

Healthy cultural organisms do not consist of:

  • Isolated individuals
  • Atomised nuclear families
  • Incomprehensibly complex groups and institutions

The world in reality is a beautifully interconnected world, and it’s interconnected through many many layers. It’s interconnected through consciousness, which is why we are spiritual beings in human form. But the plants outside my window are spiritual beings in plant form. But the plant of the lychee is in lychee form, and the tree of the mango is in mango form. They are just different expressions of one spiritual interconnected consciousness in the world.

I’ve studied quantum theory. We realised that the particles in the world are really not the basic reality. The basic reality is potential and energy, and it’s only when you try and measure it, then it shows up as a particle, or it shows up as a wave, but the reality really is that which connects, the non-separability problem. My PhD thesis was on non-separation, non-locality, and quantum theory. We knew [this] 100 years ago in physics, and yet an obsolete physics of more than 100 years ago is being used to shape and and divide a very interconnected world. So dualism today is not just epistemologically so wrong, it is not just ontologically so wrong, it is spiritually just not the right way to think of the world, but it is now becoming a threat to human life, preventing people from living with each other in diversity with love. And that’s why we have to spread the message of non-dualism, of interconnectedness, of oneness through love, and we have to be the practice...

All cultures had economies but it wasn’t the first organising principle, it was a byproduct of good living… Where did that wealth come from? It was an economy, but it was not an economy of extraction. It was not an economy of domination, it was an economy of living. If you go to the roots of the word economy, economy according to Aristotle is the art of living. Our civilisation has very deep spiritual foundations, and through spirituality you know that the diversity in the world is really different expressions of the same oneness… Let all the beings flourish

– Vandana Shiva

The relational nature of the big cycle of life is obscured as long as long as we attempt to define cultural organisms as groups of people or even groups of living beings beyond the human.

Wherever you are, most of the inmates at the grassroots level are humans trying their very best. Appreciate those who are able to see and attempt to widen the cracks in The WEIRD Spectacle, and tread carefully when confronted with the institutionalised internalised ableism of Homo Economicus®. 

Understanding your Autistic child

In the current Aotearoa New Zealand Autism Guideline the existence of Autistic culture is not mentioned with a single word. Understanding Autistic people and Autistic culture is still a secondary concern. Civil society activists and child rights’ defenders from around the world are now joining together to create the Rights-Centric Education network. Some compare Autistic life in a hypernormative culture with living life in Hard Mode. We have a long way to go until Autistic culture is as acceptable as gay & lesbian culture.

Understanding Autistic culture

Understanding Autistic people and Autistic culture is still a secondary concern.

A few days ago I had a look at the latest edition of the Aotearoa New Zealand Autism Guideline. Whilst the document mentions the importance of ethnic minority cultures, the existence of intersectional Autistic culture – in analogy to the cultures that exist in LGBTQIA+ communities – is not mentioned with a single word. 

There are major improvements in the updated guideline since we started our campaign towards a comprehensive ban of Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) and all related forms of “conversion” therapy, but the primary focus is still centred on so-called “behaviours of concern”.

This puts all the social pressure on either changing the behaviour of the Autist, or on changing the local micro-environment of the Autist at home, in education, and at work. All of this is woefully inadequate to prevent a hypersensitive Autist from becoming overwhelmed, depressed, and disillusioned with life in our hyper-normative hyper-busy industrialised society. Modern societies offer only a very limited number of “socially acceptable” life paths for Autistic people. The few healthy life paths that might be viable are mostly out of reach economically for the vast majority of the population.

In the 400+ page Aotearoa New Zealand Autism Guideline, the following paragraph sticks out:

Autistic children and young people will need to be taught the unwritten rules of the school life, such as what to do where, when and with whom. These rules tend to change depending on the circumstances and autistic children and young people will not usually be able to generalise what they have learned to different situations. Even autistic students with less obvious support needs may not understand things that others may know intuitively.

This gets close to the heart of the problem in our society. It frames the issue in terms of Autistic deficits – in the “good old” and convenient pathology paradigm!

We live in a deeply troubled society where there is no consistent set of “unwritten rules of the school life”. The “rules” are not only context specific, but “the appropriate context” is usually dictated by so-called “authorities”, and these authorities are entitled to “change the written and unwritten rules” at any time, usually to protect their position of social dominance.

Here is my Autistic philosophy / approach to life, which took me more than five decades of lived experience to be able to put into somewhat appropriate words:

collaborative niche construction = creative collaboration committed to nurturing life, to minimising suffering beyond the human, consciously constrained by human cognitive and emotional limits, and by the biophysical limits of the Living Earth – the organism that is the source of all life, capable of joy and suffering like all other living beings.

It took me over four decades to figure out that the “unwritten rules of the school life in industrialised societies” amount to:

anthropocentric progress = creative collaboration to compete, unconstrained by human cognitive and emotional limits.

On the one hand, as children we are taught to share and be nice to people – these are the spoken and written explicit rules, but on the other hand, the (re)actions we encounter in our social environment incrementally teach us the above “unwritten rule” of powered-up hierarchically organised so-called “civilisations”. Of course no official “autism guideline” will ever spell out the horrible unwritten rule in this clarity, because this would expose the dehumanising house of cards of this so-called “civilisation”.

Autistic culture rejects the “unwritten rule” of powered-up “civilisations”. In earlier times Autists where known as Daoist philosophers etc. They were recognised as having unusual life paths that collided with the views of the dominant “authorities”, but they were not pathologised!

The dominant parenting / education / indoctrination system severely traumatises and breaks the spirit of many Autists. This results in traumatised Autists who are tormented by internalised ableism. Then modern society blames these Autists for “behaviours of concern”! The trauma inflicted by the unmentionable “hidden rule” is not mentioned in any mental health guideline or in the Devil’s Sadistic Manual (DSM). I am crying as I write this, as I have read so many horror stories of lived experiences from Autistic people, and as I know how much all the Autistic people in my ecology of care are struggling.

The latest Aotearoa New Zealand Autism Guideline is good example of how to use “positive” language and a behaviour-centric approach to skirt around all the fundamental social problems – which are of course political. Autistic people are now recognised to have motivations and some right to self-determination. Maybe we are human after all? But it is obvious that in many cases the assessments and judgements of professional “authorities” and care givers are the dominant perspectives.

It can’t be emphasised enough that even though Autistic ways of being are diverse, this does not mean that there is no Autistic culture. Autistic people form communities. Autistic people need to be embedded in healthy Autistic culture to thrive. The cognitive dissonance caused by the “hidden rule” of powered-up civilisations is literally killing many of us – we know this from the suicide and mental health statistics.

Our friends at ICARS have produced a report (data from the UK) that reveals what is actually going on in our society in terms of restraints and seclusion. There is similar data from schools in Australia gathered by Autistic activists. All of this is consistent with our global participatory research into the cultural and psychological safety of Autistic and otherwise neurodivergent children.

Civil society activists and child rights’ defenders from around the world, who have been engaged in educational practice that prioritizes the rights of young people, are now joining together to create the Rights-Centric Education network to implement a so-far-not-implemented UN Proposal to establish a Rights Based Quality Assurance System for Schools, beginning with a Declaration calling for practices of education be overhauled to ensure Child Rights in Education are respected, protected, and fulfilled.

Compulsory (i.e. Imposed) Education emerged in the 1700’s in an era where Children were seen as chattel, and it had to be publicly funded because it was targeting people who weren’t going to pay for an education they did not choose. Nothing much has changed in education in spite of social perceptions having evolved from seeing children as chattel, to objects of charity, to objects of rights, and finally the recognition (at least on paper, in 1989, with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child) that children are the subjects of their own rights.

While there has been much work done on the Right TO Education – and there is indeed a problem with many children still denied access to education – hardly any attention has been paid to Rights IN Education. Consequently many violations are routinely perpetuated on children in the name of education. These violations are commonplace in state schools, private schools, and homeschooling – and because they are mainstreamed, most people don’t even realize that they constitute violations.

– Rights-Centric Education: Kinder Republic (Pvt) Ltd, Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka; Lada Center, Republic of Slovenia; Riverstone Village, South Africa; Autistic Collaboration Trust, Aotearoa New Zealand; Uniting for Children and Youth, Canada; Flourishing Education, UK.

We have a long way to go until Autistic culture is as acceptable as gay & lesbian culture. If the words Autistic and autism in the latest Aotearoa New Zealand Autism Guideline were replaced by gay & lesbian, there would be a public outcry. How about “early intervention” for “behaviours of concern” of gay & lesbian children? We are facing very similar struggles to the trans communities, only we are still further behind in gaining acceptance.

The psychological idea of mirroring is too often dumbed down to socially appropriate verbal and non-verbal expression of emotion, which really just signals that someone seems to be listening, but which is no reliable indicator of genuine shared understanding.

Certain conditions need to be met for mirroring to reflect shared understanding and genuine compassion. 

It is only when/if listener has had any comparable lived experiences that may result in a similar emotional state or experience that the speaker/communicator can feel genuinely understood. This is what Autistic people focus on. It is not enough “to be listened to”. We want to feel understood, and we are not convinced that this is achievable by verbal and non-verbal expression of emotion alone.

Linguistically, the words used in a story attempt to communicate one or more frames, i.e. the active mental models and emotional state of the communicator. To be effective, mirroring by the listener needs to reflect back a story with frames that have some overlap with the frames of the speaker/communicator. And as Quinn points out in the above video, this is not about outcompeting each other, it is about showing a genuine attempt of understanding, with an implicit invitation to the speaker/communicator to offer clarifications in case the listener has misunderstood the essence of the story. The listener may also respond with one of more clarifying questions to a story before offering a comparable experience – and this is not to be confused with a dismissal or downgrading of the story. Lastly, the listener may respond by admitting that they have never experienced anything that seems remotely comparable – and again, this is not to be confused with a dismissal or downgrading of the story.

All of the above makes sense in a setting of psychological safety, where two people trust each other, and where the intent of communication is to learn from and with each other, and to assist each other – which is the innate human impulse of naive toddlers who have not yet been socialised by the cult of homo economicus.

But we live in a transactional society dominated by mutual mistrust. In the competitive logic of homo economicus, the “naive” Autistic attempt of offering compassion and assistance often backfires. And that sits at the core of the Double Empathy Problem documented by Autistic scholar Damian Milton. The motivations of Autistic people are routinely misunderstood. And conversely, Autistic people often fail to take into consideration how the competitive logic of homo economicus reframes all that is being said in the minds of culturally “well adjusted” listeners. 

To add to the complexity, isolated and traumatised Autistic people whose spirit has been broken, who are not embedded in a neurodivergent ecology of care, may come to the conclusion that no one can ever be trusted, and end up behaving in ways that are comparable to the ways in which other highly traumatised people behave.

How does all of this play out in terms of Autistic life paths? The answer can be deduced from the answers of two closely related questions.

Do we buy into the cultural narratives that surround us?

Based on the daily lived experience of the Double Empathy Problem, it should not come as a surprise that almost by definition Autistic people don’t buy into or don’t fully buy into the mainstream cultural narratives that surround us. This can take many forms.

Many of those who find supportive Autistic community and mutual support become passionate advocates and activists for social change. Many committed environmentalists and climate activists identify as Autistic. The list of examples of openly Autistic activists is long, and the list of not-openly Autistic social activists is even longer.

Many of us end up in burnout for a range of reasons, often connected to the cognitive dissonance imposed on us by a hypernormative society governed by the unmentionable “unwritten rule of the school life in industrialised societies”. In the interview below Professor Guy McPherson outlines the aggregate effects of the “unwritten rule”. Unsurprisingly his conclusions are not very popular in wider society amongst culturally “well adjusted” people.

I don’t agree with all of Guy McPherson’s conclusions, mainly because my estimate of the limits of human cognitive abilities is lower. Therefore I am less convinced about the claims we can make about what the future holds for the human species and the other living beings on this beautiful Living Planet that gave birth to all of us. At the same time, I have more faith in the ability of the Living Planet to heal itself, and more faith in the potential that unfolds when humans (re)discover our capacity for collaboration at human scale.

Whether humans are still around in 200 years is anyone’s guess. What matters in my book is that we can strive to minimise human and non-human suffering. Along the way we can aim to minimise the depth of the current mass extinction event, regardless for how long the human species continues to be around. Struggling together, and appreciating every day in small life-affirming cosmolocal ecologies of care is the beauty of collaboration at human scale.

Do we buy into the competitive framing of evolutionary processes?

Those of us who have had the good fortune to gather some experiences within a genuinely life-affirming and de-powered cosmolocal ecology of care are no longer able to accept the toxic notion of homo economicus as so-called “human nature”.

Neurodiversity activists point out that there are many human natures. Every human is unique, and throughout life accumulates uniquely valuable lived experiences. Furthermore, framing evolutionary processes in terms of collaborative niche construction instead of competition is grounded in what we know about the collaborative tendencies of human toddlers.

The sacred cycle of life includes the joy of birth, the art of living well, and the process of dying and nurturing the living planet in good company. In contrast to the global mono-cult of capitalist patriarchy, this timeless wisdom is well understood within the Hindu, Buddhist, and Daoist philosophical and spiritual traditions.

The framing of life in terms of collaborative niche construction is much more compatible with Eastern traditions, with Joseph Tainter’s pioneering analysis of patterns of civilisational collapse, and with indigenous cultures, all of which understand the planet as a regenerative system of relationships between living entities.

Healthy Autistic collaborative niche construction

Collaborative niche construction is the evolutionary process of reducing cognitive dissonance, a process of omni-directional sensing and learning, which can only emerge in an adequately de-powered, non-overwhelming, and life affirming, i.e. holotropic and syntropic environment.

Quinn Dexter has produced excellent explanatory videos on so-called Pathological Demand Avoidance, elaborating on how the Double Empathy Problem often plays out.

There are very good and compelling reasons why many Autistic people are drawn towards Autistic and otherwise neurodivergent collaborations, and at least somewhat reluctant to engage on neuronormative terms. Life is not a performance!

In small societies without abstract formal authorities, everyone learns from everyone. The relational complexity of life, and the effects of the current de-humanising economic paradigm can’t easily be condensed into words. We need good Autistic and neurodivergent company to co-create unique ecologies of care based on sacred relationships and mutual aid at human scale.

One of the commenter’s on Quinn’s video on deconstructing PDA compares Autistic life in a hypernormative culture with “living life in Hard Mode” in a video game.

The Autistic Collaboration community grows organically, at human scale, at a human pace, one trusted relationship at a time, in the form of self-organising small groups that collaborate on specific initiatives, contributing to the wellbeing of Autistic and otherwise neurodivergent and intersectionally marginalised people.

Join us for the NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity in October!

How much cognitive dissonance is in your life?

The Autistic Collaboration Trust has been active in researching cultural and psychological safety from an intersectional perspective. We now explore the level of cognitive dissonance that is generated by the societies that people are embedded in. You are invited to contribute! The results of this research will inform the education services we provide to healthcare professionals and education providers.

As part of the overarching research theme How (the lack of) diversity in the way we collectively think about the future shapes the futures that are (im)possible this project explores the subconscious ideological roots of modern industrialised society and the emotional impact of the modern human predicament.

Cognitive dissonance surfaces whenever human emotional limits are reached. The catch is that those humans who are capable of considering themselves to be culturally well adjusted have a capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance that seems nearly unlimited from an Autistic perspective.

As pointed out in earlier articles, the discipline of economics and the modern belief in the invisible hand are best understood as the foundational beliefs of a cult. More and more people are reaching this conclusion.

In case you remain skeptical and prefer to think of the discipline of financial economics as a social science, the following short talk by John Seed may help you to see the many dogmatic assumptions that are baked into the modern economic discipline. John Seed advocates to replace the religion of economics with a spiritual movement based on the sanctity of the living planet:

Contribute your lived experience to our participatory research

You and your friends and colleagues can greatly assist our research by filling in our 8-minute anonymous survey on cognitive dissonance. Many thanks for your participation! 

The survey explores 21 social scenarios. For each scenario you are asked to think about the following questions 

  1. How do you feel?
  2. How does society expect you to feel?
  3. How do your friends expect you to feel?
  4. How does your life partner expect you to feel?

and choose one of the following answers 

  1. Really bad
  2. Somewhat bad
  3. Neutral
  4. Somewhat good
  5. Really good
  6. Could not do this (for example due to ethical concerns)
  7. Not applicable

The above survey design is new. If you have any questions regarding the survey, or have suggestions for improving the survey, please leave a comment. All feedback is appreciated.

As with all our participatory research, the results will be published via AutCollab.org, and will inform the education services we provide to healthcare professionals and education providers.

Are you able to identify the biggest source of cognitive dissonance in your life? If so, what is it?

Initial answers to this question provide a window into the social world generated by the institutional landscape of modernity. Most of the responses to date are from participants who identify as neurodivergent:

The fact that I am as highly educated as I am and that my skills are so undervalued in a capitalist economy and that I have so little idea how to market myself or make a living in a way that is consistent with my values. How much shame I have around the fact that I depend financially on my elderly parents because I am raising an ND child by myself and parenting has been so hard for me that I have not been able to work in years. That my value as a person is so tied to being able to be productive in a capitalist economy and all the inner work I do and have done throughout my life, and all I do to support my child, counts for nothing.

I don’t really do cognitive dissonance. I’m wide open to myself and the world. It sucks.

I feel bad (because I have been programmed to by my family and society) for being on disability benefits though I strongly believe that basic income and life necessities should be provided to all regardless of their ability to work in the capitalist workforce. 

Sometimes, when it becomes ‘obvious’. Right now, I’m working for the main organization in my country that claims to represent autistic people, but it is not autistic-led… I got here with the idea to change things from the inside as the only autistic activist and advocate… Knowing I might fail, I have to accept being misjudged and many things I know go against my values and dehumanize who I am. Being silent because violence and trauma and wanting to scream all the time because I want others to know the truth about this organization.

I don’t think I have much. I live pretty true to my identity and values and anything from society/others that doesn’t reflect those I keep externalised and boundaried. I’m fortunate there are not ways in my life I have to go against myself. I can walk my talk in all areas of life.

As important as trust is in relationships, my behavior is more on the side of mistrust.

Every day I deal with people who get a larger share of the values they assign to activities, events, people, and customs from what is expected by their social circle and political context than I sense that I do. I see money, jobs, consumerism, and social media groupthink as constructs that serve impersonal systems at the expense of communal connections and individual autonomy.

Ableism. Classism.

In the future, I will die. It will probably be painful and frightening. There will also be times when I will feel that I have failed at some moral obligation, and that will be hellish. But I go through life very lazily and mostly by conforming to comfortable habits instead of by always striving to be my best self and have a good meaningful life. 

Sometimes I need help and I don’t feel like I can ask for it. I feel there is a lot of social stigma around having different or extra needs.

Being alive.

Wanting to trust others and feeling I need to protect myself. 

New purchases and wanting to beautify my wardrobe and home vs discarding old items and how those discarded items affect the environment. I try to donate, resell, or recycle to quell the feelings of discomfort I have with consumerism. I also drive a luxury SUV which I enjoy and feel I deserve, but I do have to quell feelings of materialism and consumerism to enjoy it.

Definitely! The distance between what society expects me to feel and how I actually feel, less so what my friends and life partners expect me to feel. These days it is mainly the sense of shame I am supposed to feel at needing assistance with my basic needs and daily living. But in truth I don’t feel shame! I feel the effects of others’ shame, but I genuinely feel that we all are interconnected and that we will all need help at some point or the other. Note: 1. By society I also include “birth family”, who loom large in my life. 2. Also, I found myself shrugging a lot, like “I don’t know how society expects me to feel” or also like I don’t care what society expects me to feel (Something I imagine many other ND people face). 3. I would also add that I have caste privilege in the country I live in.

I find it harder to ask for help than expected by others. I get more joy out of providing help than might be expected by others.

Feeling useless and worthless for not having capitalistic value as a disabled person, when I believe that everyone has an inherent right to live a comfortable life with all of their needs met.

Reducing cognitive dissonance, catalysing intersectional solidarity

You can join us with your research ideas – and anything else you might want to discuss – at the NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity July 2024.

There is an urgent need to catalyse intersectional neurodiverse and indigenous ecologies of care all over the world. Neurodivergent, indigenous, and otherwise marginalised people depend on each other in ways that differ from the cultural norm – and that is pathologised in hypernormative societies. The endless chains of trauma must be broken.

Decolonising education

Image from https://indigenousx.com.au

The April NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity catalysed a range of conversations, with many threads weaving through the topic of education. Several topics resulted in in-depth discussion and new emerging ongoing collaborations, which is beautiful to see. Changes towards a more egalitarian culture that deeply and fully appreciates cultural, biological, and ecological diversity are changes that improve the lives of all people, re-align humanity with our evolutionary heritage, and help us nurture sacred relationships beyond the human.

The quarterly NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity offer a space for omni-directional learning in Open Space. The quarterly cadence provides room for distilling, sharing, and fermenting results between workshops. This article offers a synopsis of conversations in April 2024, as part of an ongoing Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, and Internalisation (SECI) knowledge creation spiral. Important topics can be picked up again in July, with new energy and proper attention!

Many thanks again for all your contributions to this event!

NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity – April 2024

The Autistic experiences of modern day colonialism

What can the Neurodivergent community in the West do to support healing?

The Autistic experiences of modern day colonialism. What can the Neurodivergent community in the West do to support healing?

Two experiences need to be highlighted:

  1. That of the autistic observer
  2. That of the autistic lived experience- the more important point.

The Autistic experience cannot be talked about without framing it within anti racism. DisCrit (Dis/ability Critical Race Studies) needs to be more widespread in our academic and professional fields.


Pathologization of neurodivergence and institutional racism in the context of identity and diagnosis (self or otherwise) can be considered as a part of neo-colonialism, in a similar way to the gender spectrum, which became a gender binary.


The persistent big differences in life expectancy between countries and between population segments tell the story of global economic wars – and they also include examples of countries with relatively low “economic performance” with lower levels of inequity and excellent primary healthcare services, where life expectancy is less than 5 years from countries with the highest life expectancy.


I propose an amended version of the Bronfenbrenner’s Social Model of Disability.


It is thinking about how we can meet people where they are at (means, spoons, etc.). I think it would be great (one day, somehow) to have a work group where neurodivergent people could regularly meet to come up with realistic mini actions for dismantling white supremacy. I’m doing a reading group right now, where the focus is prison/police abolition. It’s useful because there is discussion around how we can all take daily tiny actions towards this incredibly daunting eventual goal of abolition. An idea that has come up frequently is establishing communities of care, which is certainly something that AutCollab possess in spirit.


I can recommend the writings of Indrajit Samarajiva.


Industrialisation introduced an artificial distinction between “paid” work and “the rest of life”. This “great idea” has been exported globally and has led to many problems. It has meant that people have come to accept horrible conditions at work. I try to understand social problems in terms of how much out of sync cultural practices are with our evolutionary human scale heritage. For this I use a visual language for describing wellbeing.

Education and how disabled groups can work together

This is an important question that was proposed and a complex topic that we did not get to discuss in April. This topic weaves through many AutCollab articles, and through the lived experience reports and results that are emerging from our participatory research. The NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity could be one crystallisation point for intersectional collaboration. We are seeing it in the active conversations we are having around replacing / transforming the Western education system.

Nurturing diversity in humans and non-human nature – bringing the two together

See for example Ren Hurst’s writings.

How to find and create a network within my community after coming back from being abroad for 6 years

It’s not easy, I wouldn’t try directly to create a network. IMHO, I’d say you have to try and find an action that could reward you all, like organising a party, an event or simply an interview about an article you want to write. I think this last solution is a “good” one because it’s a case-by-case approach and each person will probably feel differently about your absence. Or maybe contact them one by one and check their reaction? Just to say that I’m an amateur when it comes to friendship.


One of the challenges most of us face is local isolation due to our relatively small numbers (we are a small minority) and due to the stigma and lack of active local support for Autistic community formation. Hence the AutCollab initiative to co-create centres of Autistic culture. I have since relocated to a smaller city, but this topic is on my “take action this year” list of things to do. I intend to start a conversation with the local council and the local library about this topic, and perhaps in combination with a local in-person NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity event to get started.

Non-violent communication

I fell in love with Rogerian active listening, NVC, How to Talk So Kids Will Listen And Listen So Kids Will Talk, P.E.T. etc. When I started supporting other people in learning to facilitate Self-Directed Education for young people, I recommended that they also go study one or more of these. Some of them also found this enormously helpful. A few, did not. They told of bad experiences with these approaches. When I listened, I discovered that it’s not the tool you use, it’s what you do with it. All can be weaponised. Especially when a person already experiences challenges with formulating and expressing through the spoken word it’s so easy to use these styles to dominate from a place of ‘moral high-ground’. I started excavating for the common DNA behind these approaches. I call it Horizontal Communication. I like to say it’s not how you communicate, it’s why you’re communicating. Intent is key. Www.horizontalcommunication.org outlines the basics.

I’d love to hear from other people here what your own experience is/has been.

And have any of you encountered “Clean Language” facilitation?


This is such an important topic! I like to use the term De-powered Dialogue to refer to the kind of conversations and ways of communication that are needed for omni-directional learning and genuine compassion – the mutual deep desire to understand a precious living being. Let us compare notes. See these notes on cultural and psychological safety and this article on de-powered dialogue.

Yes, the intent makes all the difference. As Autistic people we communicate to better understand and help one another. But in powered-up industrialised societies we learn the very hard way that we live in a culture in which communication is often used for deceptive purposes, to the point where a leading “autism researcher” and no shortage of neo-Darwinian social scientists and biologists consider the capacity for “flexible deception” to be a foundational and beneficial human trait, no recognising that this capacity is largely if not entirely a product and symptom of a sick culture. This takes me back to the very first post that encapsulates the motivation for establishing the AutCollab.org website.


I looked up Clean Language. It seems to have some similarity with the techniques for creative collaboration. It works beautifully if people genuinely trust each other and are curious about the other.

Things get difficult as soon as social power dynamics are present or can’t be excluded, which, speaking from painful experience 🙂 is what consistently trips up Autistic people. As soon as one party feels entitled to some form of social power, communication seizes to be honest and transparent. Things get especially tedious when the other party(ies) openly reject being subject to coercive demands / techniques. Two AutCollab articles come to mind:

What would small ecologies of care look like?

See this new specific page on this topic.

So far my ecology of care has mostly been limited to remote collaborations and 12 years of operating an egalitarian worker co-op where we share the burden of interfacing with the external world. This is an important piece of a much bigger picture.

I now live on a plot of land with two households that are collaborating on establishing a food forest, and I am learning a lot. My experience in this local aspect of ecologies of care is currently still less than 12 months, but I am immensely enjoying the experience. I love Vandana Shiva’s work, and I am delighted to now be in a position to put it into practice and adapt it to the local context. The egalitarian worker co-op experience comes in extremely handy. Now the learning can focus on the ecological aspects beyond the human.

Also, over the last 5 years or so, my focus has shifted more and more towards de-powering collaboration between human scale groups. We know how to operate small egalitarian worker co-ops, and we also have plenty of experience in interfacing with the powered-up external world. My learning is now centred around the question of how to help other small groups to transition to egalitarian worker co-op models or to catalyse the formation of such groups. We arrived at our specific worker co-op model 12 years ago as a result of another 10 years of learning from somewhat more traditional ways of operating, for example, in the early days we made the big mistake of thinking that a financial investor could help us become more established.

Now I am also interested in the ways of collaboration and non-monetary mutual aid that emerge locally, between households. This is so important. I see it as a way of incrementally and increasingly reducing the toxic levels of commodification and financialisation in our societies. These are active steps towards de-growing the “economy” and replacing it with an ecology of care!

The emerging threads of discussions this month prompted me to put together a curated list of public education resources that attempts to weave together all of the threads. Further links and insights shared in these conversations will find their way into future articles and into emerging ongoing collaborations between participants.

Questioning the neuronormativity of friendship. What is friendship for an autistic person?

I’d like you to answer three questions:

(1) What is friendship to you?

Thanks for opening up this conversation. This is a good question. I want to think, to be able to provide a succinct answer that also highlights the limits of what we can put into words. Linear language is such a limited tool 🙂


I can’t answer succinctly either, I’m using two approaches that (I think) complement each other to arrive at a vague definition: complementation through otherness -> the projection of the non-self, the satisfaction of implementing a collective holotropic understanding of the world, sustained in time.

This is about care and love as well.

But more simply, I use these words: otherness, non-self, collective, holotropism, joy, sustainable, care, love

(2) What is not friendship?

Individualism, reward circuit, comradeship.


I am not sure why ‘comradeship’ is excluded, as the word is somewhat synonymous with friendship?

(3) How does friendship with, or between, autistic people differ from neuronormative friendship?

I’m thinking about neuronormative expectations from the Western world. If you wish, there will be a second stage during which we will use your answers to guide the process of creation (to be defined collectively).

I’ve read a few academic studies but, unsurprisingly, they deal with what makes autistic people difficult friends. Further reading:

Changing the lived realities within children’s education spaces as a necessary foundation for cultural evolution

I’d like to discuss changing the lived realities within children’s education spaces as a necessary foundation for cultural evolution. I’m watching kids in Self-Directed Education grow up with substantially less trauma – it’s making a big difference. “Pathological Demand Avoidance” provides a litmus test for non-coercive education.

It took me ages to recover from schooling, and the masking it took just to survive. The SDE kids seem more authentic, seem to have a level of self-integrity I’m still acquiring in my mid 50s. My son just turned 18 and he’s already wiser than me in many ways…


I presume you are referring to approaches such as described by The Alliance for Self-Directed Education, right? This is very much the approach that I advocate. I went to school and university, but mostly I am self taught and have learned a lot by facilitating peer-to-peer learning, learning from and with others.

Much of my work with organisations within the so-called economy has been the context of collective learning. My role in particular tends to be one of knowledge archaeologist, facilitator of de-powered dialogue, and visual language co-creator. In this context typically I work with adults, with domain experts from various fields, who have come together in a transdisciplinary space to address a wicked problem.

Anecdotally, from my experience, looking back over 30 years, it seems many people within corporations and government departments have become increasingly afraid to share insights, ask uncomfortable questions, and talk openly about the limits of their knowledge and understanding, in line with what W E Deming was already observing in the 1980s.

I was not aware of the SDE Alliance. This can be helpful in our efforts to educate teachers and other educators. Many thanks! I have discovered the ecoversities network which aims to reclaim diverse knowledges, relationships and imaginations to design new approaches to higher education, which operates in the space of collective learning across all age groups, and is primarily focused on adults.

There are also valuable insights to be gained from various approaches to continuous improvement, especially practises that assist indoctrinated adults to relearn how to share knowledge and learn from each other. All such approaches involve getting people to temporarily pretend that social power gradients don’t matter. This observation led to the egalitarian neurodiventure co-op model and to the realisation that all forms of “powered-up” relationships are toxic.

Persistent Demand for Autonomy (PDA) is a healthy reaction to a powered-up traumatising social environment.

I am keen to learn from your experiences!


This is so fascinating as I had not known about this Self-Directed Education initiative, though its theory is at the core of the work that I do as a school psychologist. Thanks so much for sharing!! I find that SDE is highly in line with Dr. Ross Greene’s Collaborative and Proactive Solutions model: Lives in the Balance. I usually recommend its approaches when working with students who I suspect are PDA.

How would you say SDE differs from traditional Montessori schools? The impression I get is that Montessori schools generally still operate as regular schools under the illusion of self directed learning, whereas true SDE establishments truly focus on full autonomy without imposing an educator’s (or society’s) views during the learning process. Are outdoor or nature schools the same things as SDE? I am hearing about many “outdoor preschools” pop up all around my area.


I’m on the Ecoversities WhatsApp group but mostly lurking as my time is very full so I prioritise carefully – So far this space seems more promising, grin.

Montessori is what we call Progressive rather than SDE, and forest schools vary widely – some are SDE, some are not even Progressive. The bottom line is whether an adult is ultimately attached to their own idea of what a child needs to learn, or whether the adult is able to fully respect the child’s autonomy and step back into a genuine assistant role.

Here’s a good article on Progressive vs SDE.

My younger child is a PDAer. My experience is that SDE is ethically appropriate and helpful for all kids, deeply liberating for Neurodivergent kids and 100% necessary for PDAers. The defining feature of SDE is not in the way the child learns e.g. curriculum, project based, free exploration or whatever. The defining feature is that the child is the genuine decision maker.

I love Ross Greene, although my experience is that PDA doesn’t respond well to any communication that is in any way formulaic. The principles need to be internalised and then the communication can be more natural. Even asking Whatsup can become a demand if used more than once.

Please send teachers my way if they’re interested. I make my living training adults in SDE Facilitation. Teachers have a harder time than non teachers though, as they have so much to unlearn, and they often struggle vocationally making the shift because they’ve often been attracted to teaching because they need to feel useful and central and it’s hard to become peripheral. Many teachers really enjoy the creativity that goes into getting a disinterested person to engage with prescribed content. SDE does not attempt, in fact carefully avoids, trying to manipulate attention.


Many thanks for sharing your experiences. Perhaps we can collaborate in educating teachers. One aspect we try to emphasise is that neurodivergence is not limited to children. For schools, providing a safe environment for all staff is just as important as providing a safe environment for the students.

The emerging threads of discussions this month prompted me to put together a curated list of public education resources that attempts to weave together all of the threads. Further links and insights shared in these conversations will find their way into future articles and into emerging ongoing collaborations between participants.


You make me wish I had more time to explore this rabbit hole. Thank you for this. I will dip in as I can and am saving links. Right now I’m figuring out effective emancipation strategies in the face of oppressive draft legislation around school education in South Africa. Everything you say in the article above applies…


Thank you so much for your thoughtful response. The article you provided was further clarifying, but I also found your distinction very helpful. I think you opened up a whole other rabbit hole for me to explore when I have the spoons so I truly appreciate that!

To one of your points about teachers having so much to unlearn, I find it is the same in the field of ABA, at least here in America. In addition to the need to feel helpful and need for control, I feel like a lot of ABA therapists also may be autistic themselves and perhaps make a living of how to help others like them. This is exactly how I would also describe my experience entering the field of school psychology. The problem becomes, however, that the systems we have in place aren’t complementary to these ideas we are talking about and so we are systematically training teachers and ABA therapists alike, who may have completely the right intentions, how to indoctrinate neurodivergent students into this transactional world that is not built for anyone except the privileged, truly. Public education was designed to indoctrinate, not to educate, so I am afraid as hard as educators might try, the system just doesn’t work.

Happy to discover there are several in my state and one SDE school in particular near me. I am currently working in public education to pay school loans but am constantly investigating alternate options given my skill set- I feel my job in general shouldn’t exist in the sense that special education should not have to exist (i.e. as in SDE schools), but I think there is value in identifying educational “profiles” with respect to identifying an individual’s needs and omni-directionally problem-solving (student learns from mentor and mentor learns from student) to navigate effective ways around barriers.


I find that the topic of PDA relates directly to The fifty-seventh chapter of the Dao De Ching. PDA can be understood as the result of our bodyminds leading us to the healthy insight of letting go of internalised ableism – to stop playing the [hypernormative social] game. This insight is very old. Yet it seems to be an insight that is missing, or at the very least subordinated to dogmatic, coercive systems of beliefs in capitalism and in many monotheistic religions. This chapter of the Dao De Ching is a beautiful reminder of human scale limitations, an antidote to anthropocentric myths of superiority.


I am host to a small group busy finalising a Declaration of Educational Rights that we started work on in 2020 and that I strategically need to complete this month, and one of the clauses to be written this weekend concerns neurodivergence. The placeholder so far reads:

“Article 7: Should deal with neurodivergence to be de-pathologised and neurotypical norms shall not be imposed.”

Your input would be welcomed. Please let me know if you’d like to see the full document for context.


Yes, please share details. The Design Justice Network is possibly related or a source of ideas for adaptation to your context of education.


As part of engaging with our database of teachers we’ve just put out a new ongoing survey, with a focus on experiences in education environments. The survey is very similar to the one we use to assess psychological and cultural safety in other aspects of life.

It will be valuable to hear first hand accounts from within the web of political constraints of the neoliberal Overton window academia. Because of the severe constraints, there is a need for independent research.

This is one of the reasons why ongoing AutCollab participatory research is so important. We are not institutionally constrained in terms of the questions that we are asking. We invite everyone to contribute and also to suggest useful questions and research agendas that are relevant for neurodivergent communities. At the same time we are open to exploring collaboration with aligned academics, on condition that AutCollab is the custodian of the research data, so that we can consult with Autistic communities when putting together a research agenda, before granting academic researchers within the established [neoliberal] system access to any data we are gathering.

Reflections

The NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity offer a rich opportunity for omni-directional learning across cultures and geographies, bringing into focus the chasm between the life affirming ecologies of care and the life destroying busyness of the global mono-cult.

Omni-directional learning framed in the language of ecologies of care is at the core of all Autistic collaborations.

The topics of omni-directional learning and conceptual framing are close to my heart. George Lakoff offers a good introduction to the role of framing in language and thought – please note that some of the linguistic examples of frames and metaphors provided apply to Western cultures and to the English language, they are part of WEIRD psychology and do not translate one to one to other cultures and languages.

The abstract categories of frames and metaphors are foundational for understanding symbolic thought.  Autistic culture evolves at human scale, by sharing lived experiences in Neuroqueer Learning Spaces – like the NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity.

We can only fully understand and undo (neo)colonialism by reframing the social world without using the masters tools.

It is learning how to take our differences and make them strengths. For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us temporarily to beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change.
– Audrey Lorde, Black, lesbian, feminist, socialist, mother, warrior, poet

Great examples of decolonising frames are found in the following episodes of The Moanan podcast, which acts as a bridge, connecting indigenous pacific knowledge holders and scholars to descendants of the Moana, living in diasporas today:

  1. Indigenous Pacific voyaging/navigation
  2. The migration from South East Asia into the Moana

The sacred oneness of life

The (neo)colonial perspective denies the oneness of life, and relies on framing the evolutionary process of life as a competitive game, which culminates in an anthropocentric notion of progress, rather than in terms of ecologies of care beyond the human, which are part of a regenerative cycle of life bound by planetary biophysical limits.

Cultural framing determines whether competitive or collaborative motives are the primary drivers of social interaction, and by implication, whether competitive or collaborative motives are understood and treated as secondary drivers.

Anyone who has ever worked with agent based models and simulations knows that confusing first order effects and second and higher order effects results in radically different behaviours. Depending on which cultural framing prevails, and depending on the degree to which human collaborative tendencies and ecological frames are not only denied, but also actively discouraged and pathologised, we can distinguish four basic categories of human societies:

There is a good reason for ecology having become a discipline in its own right. To this day the dominant frames in the discipline of biology remain entangled with a paternalistic capitalist ideology. David Sloan Wilson has done some good work on multi-level group selection and dual inheritance, but he is still trapped within the Western frame of technological “progress”.

When you are doing the right thing for the earth, she gives you great company.
– Vandana Shiva

Cultural framing and individual sensitivity profiles define the relative priorities of competitive or collaborative motives. The evolution of the human capacity for language and culture, as well as results from experiments with small children indicate that collaborative intentions dominate prior to socialisation.

Re-humanising neurodivergence

In times when social paradigms have become toxic, more and more people subconsciously suffer from cognitive dissonance. Autists and the Arts play an essential role in allowing cognitive dissonance to surface and be shared in explicit form, in ways that transcend words, simplistic linear narratives, and established paradigms.

A♾tistic : Autistic, Artistic, and other ways of being that deviate from hypernormativity. 

We are the utopian dreamers.
The invisible pioneers.
The vulnerable change-makers.
The compassionate healers.
We are the creative pathfinders.
The quiet adventurers.
The accidental discoverers.

Re-humanising learning

Conventional education ignores the priorities of basic human needs.

Conventional education aims to try and get the child to learn stuff, and then now that we’re focusing on getting the child to learn stuff we want to try and add some mental health stuff on top, where we kind of also try to make them feel a bit competent and have good relationships but that’s secondary.

Self-directed Education Works exactly the other way around: we start by focusing on meeting those core needs so that we have a strong thriving person because after that things tend to happen fairly naturally because especially with PDA there is that drive for Mastery that drive for competence um that desire to do things well and when there’s enough.

From Why is Self-Directed Education so ideal for PDA?

Within the neurodiversity paradigm PDA is understood as a healthy response to a hypernormative, oppressive (neo)colonial cultural context, it is referred to as a Persistent Demand for Autonomy.

CARDS = Competence, Autonomy, Relatedness, Dignity, and Safety

When these core needs of Competence, Autonomy, Relatedness, Dignity, and Safety are met for any human being, you’re going to have a state that is leaning more towards thriving, and to the extent that these core needs are not being sufficiently met, you’re going to have a person struggling no matter what their neurotype.

From Why is Self-Directed Education so ideal for PDA?

Within modern industrialised cultures, those with uncommon sensitivity profiles and a distinctly reduced capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance, especially over longer periods of time, increasingly receive pathologising and stigmatising diagnoses such as autism spectrum disorder, pathological demand avoidance, and oppositional defiant behaviour.

The key question: Who is benefitting from stigma and from labels that pathologise individuals? The obvious answer: Established institutions of social power within modern industrialised cultures – in other words, the institutional landscape that perpetuates (neo)colonialism. In this context the corporate neurodiversity-lite attempt of co-opting of the language of the neurodiversity paradigm reveals itself as an exercise in perception management, and as a tool for subordinating neurodivergent people to the oppressive system of control of the mono-cult.

Pathologising and dehumanising individuals for not conforming to the factory model of industrialised society has become a core practice of neo-colonialism, alongside the perpetuation of deadly wars, including deadly economic wars across the artificial national boundaries conceived by colonial powers.

Assigning pathologising labels to individuals allows the institutional landscape of (neo)colonialism to marginalise all those who openly resist subordination to the mono-cult, including those who are not already part a marginalised minority group or an “underdeveloped economy”. Modern hypernormative practices of dehumanisation are specifically designed for perpetuating social power gradients in a globalised world, irrespective of national boundaries.

Furthermore hypernormative practices and values in the digital era increasingly devalue all forms of biological life, and are deeply entangled with the goals of eugenics and the suicidal narrative of linear and ultimately unlimited technological progress:

Pathologising labels facilitate the “free” unlimited imposition of demands from self-declared cultural authorities on those who are considered insignificant by the mono-cult. In this context the institutional landscape of cultural authorities relies on the internalised ableism of parents, educators, and medical professionals to perpetuate the mono-cult. Internalised ableism is the Achilles Heel of the mono-cult.

Educating parents, educators, and medical professionals about the lived experiences of neurodivergent people is an important tool for exposing the harm perpetuated by the mono-cult. Intersectional solidarity, Autistic culture, and Persistent Demand for Autonomy are part of a healthy cultural immune response towards the life destroying mono-cult.

Changes towards a more egalitarian culture that deeply and fully appreciates cultural, biological, and ecological diversity are changes that improve the lives of all people, re-align humanity with our evolutionary heritage, and help us nurture sacred relationships beyond the human.

Onwards! Together. In good company.

Small is good, small is all

I borrowed this fitting one-liner from The small things Manifesto, a work in progress, a living document, written and compiled by Andrew Roach. A quote from the introduction:

Many of the major technological and cultural innovations of the last several hundred years have served to flatten the world, eliminate or obviate distance, and bring us closer together as people. Printing, transportation, telephone, radio, television, home video, and the internet have each, in their own way, made our impact on the world bigger, and made parts of the world smaller.

But this came at a price.

Technology is not a net good, or even a neutral force. Technology is a Force Multiplier. It reshapes the world to fit the vision of those who design it, regulate it, and wield it. Oil companies poison our lakes and rivers, slowly boiling our planet. Facebook tracks everything we do online and uses that data to make us miserable. Disney owns an outsized portion of modern folklore. The FCC decides who gets to launch a radio station, and under what circumstances. Television turns reasonable people in to rabid fans of raving monsters, and turns raving monsters in to celebrities, politicians and thought leaders.

It does not have to be this way.

It is this way thanks to a combination of factors, most of which can be summarized as “The Profit Motive.” For some companies, making people angry is a surefire way to drive Engagement, and driving Engagement is a surefire way to make money. For other companies, the money lies in controlling our access to our own culture, gatekeeping who is allowed to tell stories, and when, and how. For these major corporations, there is no incentive to Help, to Improve. There’s no money in making the world a better place.

It will not be easy.

Most new technologies, but especially Digital technologies, experience a period between inception and corporatization during which they florish as a result of a bunch of disparate people with distinct goals who Explore the space that the technology creates, often without regard for profit of any kind, or at least with some motivation beyond pure profit. Then there is, usually, a period of contraction and consolidation around the things that have made the most money (or, in the case of television, have had the most Regulatory support from the corrupt FCC) and you’re left with HBO/DISCOVERY, Disney, Facebook, and Joe Rogan.

But we can reject the profit motive!

Local theater still happens, in spite of the fact that it stopped being profitable ~100 years ago. Local music still happens, in spite of the fact that only 1 band in 100 is going to make their living making music, and significantly fewer than that are ever going to Make It. Small creators make video games in their spare time because they enjoy it. Hundreds of people work together to run free and open alternatives to major social media networks, funded out of their own pockets.

Ars Enim Mutare; Art for change

These things happen in isolation, from creators who make things because the want to make things. They toil, often in isolation, for little reward. This is a call to action for solidarity, and support and intentional creation. We can reshape the world, and support one another as we do it. We can opt out of activities that enrich corporations that seek to make us suffer or to destroy us. We can (and must) become our own media.

The key element that holds together all the threads, which has been systematically eroded in Westernised societies: the notion of trust, including the role of trustworthy, sacred relationships within the context of human scale ecologies of care beyond the human.

How safe do/did you feel growing up?

Initial results from a survey on psychological safety and mental wellbeing indicate that the biggest fears of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+, and Disabled children – and especially those who also belong to cultural minorities, relate to classmates, parents, and teachers. 97% indicate often or always having anxiety, and 80% indicate often or always feeling depressed. We are committed to gathering further data from as many geographies as possible. The data and lived experience reports will flow into our education courses for teachers, and will inform our advocacy work.

The results from our Feeling Safe Growing Up survey highlight that neurodivergent and intersectionally marginalised children grow up in a highly traumatising environment, and often don’t seem to have any genuinely safe and trustworthy relationships. The numbers are so staggering that they leave me speechless, they speak louder than words. And yet, they are in many ways consistent with my own childhood experience. Even the limited initial results are worthwhile sharing to encourage wide circulation of the survey.

This article presents participatory research data in a visual format, and provides context in terms of the demographics covered.

How safe do intersectionally marginalised students feel?

The vast majority of education professionals are ignorant not only about Autistic culture and Autistic ways of being, they are also ignorant about the prevelance of complex trauma amongst intersectionally marginalised people, including both students and their colleagues.

The data and anonymous lived experience reports on psychological safety during childhood presented in this article are the initial results from an ongoing survey.

Especially if you are part of a minority group, you can greatly assist our ongoing efforts by contributing your childhood experiences to our anonymous survey Feeling Safe Growing Up.

The results presented relate to all the responses received from marginalised population segments, 36 responses so far, with an emphasis on lived experiences in education settings.

If you are part of a minority group, you can also assist our ongoing efforts by contributing your lived experiences to our anonymous survey Feeling Safe.

Demographics

Geography

Whilst so far most of the responses received are from the US, an analysis of the the data set reveals that responses from other countries are very much consistent with the US results. It seems childhood experiences are very similar across Western societies, underscoring the hypernormalising effects of the global mono-cult. In this article we therefore only explore the aggregate numbers across all geographies.

Intersectionality of Autistic communities

The level of intersectionality visualised in this graph is consistent with the larger dataset from our survey Feeling Safe that covers the lived experiences of adults within their families and in other social spheres.

(Un)safety in different social spheres

These numbers need no commentary. Answers to similar questions related to adult lived experiences are visualised in the graph below.

The answers from students below should be alarming for all educators and teachers, raising serious questions about typical classroom experiences, and what if anything is being learnt.

How feeling unsafe is experienced

Again, the numbers above are noticeably more disturbing than numbers relating to the experiences from the lives of adults (in the graph below).

Back to the way in which neurodivergent and intersectionally marginalised students are experiencing / have experienced their childhood:

The numbers speak louder than any words:

Lived experiences from school and educational environments

This section only features a small number of examples from our growing database of participatory research.

What are the most important things you wished your teachers to know, respect, and do, when engaging with you?

Just because I was quiet and got good grades didn’t mean I was doing okay. I was horribly bullied and abused by classmates, and no one did anything about it. And I didn’t feel like I could speak up. I didn’t even know that was an option. 

I wish there was more awareness and compassion towards mental health problems and what “high functioning” neurodivergence looks like. I wish teachers had bothered to ask about my home life and mental health rather than comparing my academic performance to other students’ and questioning why I wasn’t applying myself.

I wish my teachers had understood that I was not attempting to be disruptive when asking questions or raising issues. I wish they had treated me as a more genuine person, and as a person at all, instead of an obstacle. 

I honestly wish teachers and professors knew that I may not always able to reach out for help. I wish they would react to signs of struggle sooner if even at all.

I wished I had been identified as Autistic in school and had received help then. I wished I had someone recognize I was being abused at home and helped me.

Saying “so much potential” doesn’t help unleash potential in any way. Forcing us to do repetitive work (multiplication tables in grade 9 math, for a real example) is intellectually stifling. When a child is performing poorly in school, and they test as very intelligent, consider whether it might not be the child at fault, but rather an educational system designed to teach by rote and not by understanding. Don’t incarcerate a child for giving literal answers. Don’t assume a child giving literal answers is trying to talk back. That might be an autistic attempt at complete honesty. (Unfortunately the police who need to know this are unlikely to understand.) It’s hard to overstate how much damage is done by criminalizing a child for autistic behaviour.

Abuse isn’t teaching. Asking for clarification isn’t insolence. Not wanting to engage isn’t ‘acting out’.

Just because the teaching and learning method you know is what you teach doesn’t mean it’s going to work for me and saying it louder and more often doesn’t change that.

i wish my teachers understood my needs when i was younger, and even now. even when i go out of my way to tell them about my conditions, which is already draining enough, they refuse to adjust, despite it being *documented* that it helps me.

Understanding how seriously damaging the bullying was and the double empathy problem.

I listen best when I don’t look at them. I need protection from bullies. 

I was overperforming (using anxiety to get good grades and gain approval) and did not have a happy home life. I needed extra support with executive functioning and making friends. Just because I was quiet and “good” didn’t mean I wasn’t struggling. 

I wish all professionals, whether teachers or medical, would accept the neurodiversity paradigm and stop pathologizing the existence of so-called “invisible minorities”. While LGBTQIA+ is a bit further ahead in acceptance than Autism, there are still so many problems there as well.

Be patient, and don’t yell at me or mock me. Don’t tell me “rules” that don’t actually apply to everyone because I will follow them forever at great personal cost. Intervene when you see bullying rather than expecting children to fight it out themselves. Don’t force speech.

I was a curious, inquisitive kid, and I asked a lot of questions. Sometimes teachers didn’t have time for to answer those, or they just didn’t have answers. That’s fine. Just say so. Sometimes they gave me non-answers, or were otherwise dismissive of the substance of my questions. That would really piss me off, and would result in conflict that was serious enough to make teachers quit teaching. So don’t do that. Just say you don’t know, or don’t have time to answer my question at this time. If you’re going to demand that I accept something, solely on the basis of your authority as a teacher, pupils like me will buck, and everyone will be worse off for it.

Have you had any traumatising experiences in school and other education settings that no one should ever experience? Please outline.

in grade school (middle school especially) i was constantly a victim of bullying which the teachers/administration did nothing to prevent. multiple times staff turned it around and asked if i had done anything to _provoke_ the bullying (once when i complained of bullying they even asked if i had been having sex with the bully, which was absolutely an inappropriate question and completely unfounded), and multiple times they told me they could either do nothing or suspend both me and the bully (usually i took this option, because it seemed better than nothing, and when i returned from suspension sometimes students/other teachers would ask why i had been away, and i could say i had been unjustly suspended and use that as a conversation starter to try to point out the systematic issues, although nothing ever seemed to come of that).

the trauma was more pervasive rather than any one incident. more the environment generally, especially the expectation to chase grades destroying long term motivation to learn

Yes. My bullies would torment me daily, making fun of me and various aspects of how I look or who I am. I was in survival mode all of my school years. Home was the only place I felt safe. 

My baby sitter convinced me to stand up and tell my teacher I was being bullied. The bully’s teacher made me apologize for a *fake accusation* because “oh she would never have done that!” The accusation wasn’t fake. Trust broken. Completely. 

I was assaulted on a school bus which was cheered and applauded by peers and ignored by the bus driver. I had sat in my normal seat, which someone standing in the aisle had apparently planned to sit in. I refused to move, and she attempted to force me. I was accused of plagiarism on my reading log by a teacher due to my extensive reading record. My physical appearance was publicly mocked by a teacher. I was in gym, so in the mandatory gym uniform, and another teacher came in and made fun of my legs, I believe something akin to “Now I know why you don’t wear shorts.” I’m sure there are others i’m forgetting at the moment. 

Yes. “School” below refers to K-12. I was scapegoated and shunned in school. I do not use those terms lightly. Elementary school, teacher-led scapegoating ended after a couple of years but I remained a pariah through high school. Those traumatized me more than physical violence. I did not have a chance to develop socially until my 20s, when it was much much harder (probably because it was after neural pruning). At school, I was under constant, unending risk of violence from classmates. I was almost expelled for refusing to ever shower after gym class, but the walls and floor were concrete, and I was justifiably afraid of concussion and rape. I was the fastest one to get changed, too, because adults also avoided the change rooms, making them especially dangerous zones. At school, I was violently sexually abused (punched in the crotch). “Stand with your arms at your sides or go to detention” meant I went to detention instead of unclasping my hands, which I clasped firmly over my genitals for protection. At school, i was consistently told that my poor performance was my fault. For context, I tested several standard deviations above average intellectually, I was writing software in grade 3, reading before kindergarten, and reading at a university level by grade 7. School was prison, torture. Again, not terms used lightly. And being intellectually quashed was deprivation. It’s illegal to keep a child in a house’s basement, denying them stimulus, refusing to speak in their presence; it shouldn’t be acceptable to do so in a school basement. It is a quiet killing, a destruction of the future of that child.

Regular physical and non-stop mental abuse.

Often abandoned when asking for clarification or accommodations. “Figure it out what I meant or get an F. No I will not help clarify” – Ridicule and mocking from both peers and teachers when not understanding social contexts or apparently cultural touch points such as movies TV shows or books that I have not yet experienced or was not aware of. – Being grouped with people that are known for harassing autistic kids in the school.

My peers eventually bullied me enough, to the point i was both hospitalised for risk of harming myself, and then pulled out of the school. i don’t typically remember much, but i remember that night vividly. i’m still in distance education, and i don’t plan on changing.

I was emotionally and physically bullied to the point where I was having flashbacks by second grade and had all the symptoms of CPTSD by middle school.

One time i was asked to resolve a math problem that i did not understand in front of the classroom and the teacher made fun of me. It took 30 minutes before the teacher let it go, but he never explained. My classmates stood by my side though. Later i perfectly understood the math problem, it was the teaching method that wasn’t right for me.

I believe being unseen because of being quiet and a “good girl” was traumatizing. Especially in difficult subjects like math (I have identified as an adult that I have dyscalculia) taught by an unaware man who had no sense of how to handle children, very unaware of my struggles. I suffered in silence. I marked above that I was never angry and never had meltdowns and it’s important to note that’s because I wasn’t ALLOWED to be that way. I had to be good, and that was heavily encouraged by society, parents, teachers, and adults. It was the only way I could receive positive attention and not receive negative attention. 

Being grabbed by classmates and having grass clippings shoved down the front of my shirt. Being unable to use the washrooms at school due to the sensory environment and danger of being attacked by other students and developing severe constipation for 6 years as a result; being too afraid of my teachers to ask to go to the washroom during class time in the early grades.

I shouldn’t have been mocked and othered for just being myself and getting excited over the things I liked.

Safety of work environments in the education sector

Our survey data on the safety of work environments is from an ongoing survey across all sectors of the economy, across a population of more than 329 workers, of which more than 10% identify as Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and/or Disabled, and of which 177 work in the education sector.

You can greatly assist our ongoing efforts by contributing your lived experiences to our anonymous survey Psychological Safety. We would love to expand our dataset to be able to compare differences between various sectors in the economy and between the lived experiences in different geographies.

Demographics

Baseline across all education professionals

The demographics of marginalising categories across education professionals within our database:

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled education professionals

The intersectionality of marginalising categories amongst Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people across the education professionals within our database:

How safe do educators feel at work?

Baseline across all education professionals

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled education professionals

The lack of psychological safety of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled educators underscores the lived experience reports from students. If teachers bully and mistreat colleagues from minority groups, what are the chances that students from minority groups will have positive experiences at school?

Further answers from Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled educators. These numbers are consistent with the datasets from Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled workers in other sectors:

Conclusions

Safety of intersectionally marginalised students

Across the board, most Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled students do not feel safe within their families, amongst their classmates, and with their teachers.

Prevelance of trauma

In our survey data, 92% of Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled students often or always feel overwhelmed, and over 89% of Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled students often or always feel misunderstood. Over 70% of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people often or always have at least five negative feelings, in addition to the above, feeling bullied, insecure, and disrespected. Furthermore over 60% often or always feel unsafe, and over 30% indicate that they often or always feel betrayed and abandoned.

84% of the Neurodivergent respondents to our Feeling Safe Growing Up survey identify as Autistic. This means that the demographics of our data show the large overlap and the intersectionality between Autistic communities, and the LGBTQIA+ and Disabled communities.

In our survey data 45% of Autistic students also identify as Disabled, and 61% number identify as LGBTQIA+. This means the majority of Autistic students are intersectionally marginalised. We are are part of an easily overlooked minority within the Disabled and LGBTQIA+ communities.

Given this context, it is no surprise that complex trauma is very common amongst Autistic students, and that this is reflected in our mental health statistics.

Our survey data indicated that 97% of Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent students often or always experience anxiety, and 80% often or always feel depressed. 67% often or always suffer from stress related health problems, and 58% often or always suffer from burnout and insomnia.

The biggest fears of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled students relate to:

  1. classmates (78%)
  2. their parents (64%)
  3. teachers (58%)

In comparison, the numbers of those whose greatest fears relate to other social spheres are much lower:

  1. healthcare environments (36%)
  2. school bus / transport environments (25%)
  3. unmet healthcare needs (22%)
  4. siblings (22%)
  5. friends (19%)

It is very clear that education settings are consistently experienced as highly unsafe by Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled students.

This is also reflected in the experiences submitted in the qualitative parts of our survey.

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled education professionals

Many Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled education professionals often or always feel unsafe amongst peers, and more than 50% or more of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals often or always feel unsafe with their superiors, noticeably more so than their non/less-marginalised colleagues.

Across the board, the level of psychological safety amongst Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled workers is much lower than the level of psychological safety amongst workers in general.

Next steps

Contribute to our participatory research

Participate in our anonymous surveys, submit lived experience reports, and encourage your colleagues, families, friends, and local schools to participate. Our surveys do not ask for the names of schools. We are not interested in ranking schools, we are interested in gathering country wide statistics.

Feeling Safe Growing Up – This 5 minute anonymous survey (fifteen questions) is conducted by the Autistic Collaboration Trust and is sponsored by S23M.

Feeling Safe – This 5 minute anonymous survey (fourteen questions) is conducted by the Autistic Collaboration Trust and is sponsored by S23M.

Regularly attend our education courses for educators

If you are a teacher or education professional, join our education courses for educators as part of your Continuous Professional Development (CPD) efforts.

Our courses are taught by neurodivergent educators, allow you to learn from our unique database of lived experiences, and provide interactive opportunities to learn from and with members of the intersectional AutCollab community.

Onwards! – The AutCollab Education Team.

How unsafe do Autistic and intersectionally marginalised people feel in your presence?

The biggest fears of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people relate to unmet healthcare needs, their work environment, their parents, and disrespect by healthcare professionals. Data from our participatory research shows the large overlap and the intersectionality between Autistic communities, and the LGBTQIA+ and Disabled communities.

The vast majority of healthcare professionals are ignorant not only about Autistic culture and Autistic ways of being, they are also ignorant about the prevelance of complex trauma amongst intersectionally marginalised people.

This article presents Dr. B. Educated participatory research data in a visual format, and provides context in terms of the demographics covered.

If you are mainly interested in a summary of the results and in recommendations for clinical practice, you can navigate straight to the conclusions, and to the steps you can take towards making healthcare environments more accessible and safer for intersectionally marginalised people.

How safe do intersectionally marginalised people feel?

Our survey data on the relative safety people experience in different spheres of life is from an ongoing survey of marginalised populations, currently limited to 129 responses, which an emphasis on lived experiences in healthcare settings.

If you are part of a minority group, you can greatly assist our ongoing efforts by contributing your lived experiences to our anonymous survey Feeling Safe.

Demographics

Geography

Intersectionality of Autistic communities

(Un)safety in different social spheres

How feeling unsafe is experienced

Lived experiences from clinical environments

This section only features a small number of examples from our growing database of participatory research.

What are the most important things you wish healthcare professionals to know, respect, and do, when engaging with you?

I wish they wouldn’t make assumptions about autism. I have sensory challenges. Informed consent is a must. Do not order, push, or try to change my mind about treatment. I will decide what I can do and what I want. I believe in self advocacy and working as a team with healthcare providers. I don’t do well with anyone who wants to tell me what to do. I haven’t met many who understand the needs of autistic people.

Clarity and not get upset if I ask them to repeat the questions, and wait if I don’t respond fast enough.

That autists can have higher sensitivities to life stressors, which affects every part of health. 

That if I am bringing a problem to them, I have already spent a lot of time learning and thinking about it and they should be open to asking me questions instead of dismissing my concerns based on my history of depression/anxiety.

Don’t lie to me, or lie by ommission. Do not withold information for fear I will be upset by it. Lay everything out as it is. I cannot make informed decisions if I am not properly informed. In the sam vein; I will take everything you say at face value. If you mince words, if you exagerate or hold back, I will not realise. I will not read between the lines and put together your puzzle. Just because I seem okay, it does not mean I am. I have had decades of practice at acting “normal”. That mask doesn’t drop just because I’m in pain, physical or mental.

I don’t always feel pain or discomfort the same way as others, and I can take longer to process new information and formulate questions about it. Encouraging follow up emails would help. 

Listen and believe my experience.

Our bodies are all holding so much trauma. 

My experience of pain and responses to treatment in psychotherapy and medical settings (i.e., anesthesia does not work as expected in my body); and all mental health and medical treatment must be managed differently to prevent iatrogenic harm.

They need to understand when you upset someone with communication difficulties, it amplifies those difficulties. That it steals our words. I need them to listen to me when I talk and to believe what I have to say. To consider it at face value as I describe it, not twist and warp it with intent into something it is not. It is important to allow me to start where I need to in the process of medical history, starting in the middle can be hard. The forms should be more detailed; tell me if you want 2 years or all of my medical history. 

Even though I am a grey haired middle aged autistic bisexual married woman, I am not stupid. I am often treated as if I am somehow low in intelligence. My IQ is around 146 +- 10. People expect me not to be able to use my cell phone, not to understand simple medical explanations etc. The lightning in the doctor´s often is very difficult, and all stimuli is overwhelming. 

I hear you when you’re talking about me even when I don’t appear to be listening or capable of hearing. I’m afraid you will kill me. My personal experiences and the experiences of my family and the experiences of others taught me this fear. When I may be in need of medical attention I consider whether I am ready to die in your care. If you are engaging with me it will be because I think the risk of dying is higher without at least attempting to get medical help. If that happens: Please do not disparage me, or make fun of me, or laugh at me, or punish me with your power because you are angry at me. Please know that I am not trying to be difficult, ever. Please help me by asking me questions and listening to my answers. Please ask me if I have questions and reply respectfully to those questions if I do. Please let me offer solutions to your gown and other things that cause me distress while I am being treated. Please don’t lie to me. Please know that I am terrified, even when I do not appear to be. I may not be able to speak or hear well. I may seem to be resistant to things that don’t make any sense to you. I would need you to explain why you are doing what you are doing. I am very courageous and can put up with many painful and invasive things if necessary but I need to understand. I am slow processing but I can and do understand a lot. I’m capable. Please give me time, information, and choices. That said, please listen to what I am telling you about my body and my symptoms. I am listening to you. I am not lying. I understand that I can be wrong. I am not thinking I know better than you. If I did I wouldn’t be there. Please do not force me or manipulate me physically or otherwise to do things you want me to do.

Have you had any traumatising experiences in healthcare settings that no one should ever experience? Please outline.

Yes. Pushing of invasive screenings. Disrespect of my bodily autonomy and informed consent. Rough exam. I avoid going to the doctor at this point as no one is autism and trauma informed.

I was in the ER after my hip had dislocated for the 3rd time. The doctor never visited me prior and after my resetting of my hip. He also left the hospital to go to his private practice without giving an order to the discharging nurse to remove my catheter. I personally had to call his office. When I asked to personally speak to the doctor he refused and I was embarrassed to tell the receptionist that I needed to have him call the hospital and give the order to remove the catheter. I was so upset my words were mumbled, I shut down from anger, and cried all the way home. It took hours to regain my composure. 

Yes. I have had a male doctor pretty much kick me out of the patient room. I had a female doctor misdiagnose me with a rare brain disorder and put me on the wrong medication; when I told her it wasn’t working she upped my dose. She refused to hear any of my other symptoms or complications. Not many doctors understand the consequences of sensitivity on the body. My therapist didn’t even recognize my autism until I got diagnoses through my psychiatrist. 

Yes, too many and I’m going right now with a breast cancer diagnosis with 0 accommodation .

Yes, multiple. I respond differently to anesthesia and have had horrifically painful surgeries while fully conscious and feeling everything. I was repeatedly misdiagnosed with major depression, generalized anxiety, and borderline personality disorder and mistreated as a result in subsequent treatment settings. I am a mental health professional. 

I am partially from a Muslim background- during my second appointment with a talk therapist, I mentioned a poor relationship with my father, and she immediately assumed that his poor attitude towards me was due to his religious background. She kept insisting on this even after I explained that the issues were clashes of personality between two people living in the same house (he is impatient and quite extroverted, I do tasks slowly and am almost asocial).

Yes. People not respecting my pronouns, my gender. Doctors not wanting to treat me for being trans. Having my illnesses minimized due to my mental health diagnosis.

My former psychologist used to invalidate me because I began to unmask my autistic traits. I left because she did not want to understand anything about my experience in the world.

Safety of work environments

Our survey data on the safety of work environments is from an ongoing survey across all sectors of the economy, across a population of more than 320 workers, of which more than 10% identify as Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and/or Disabled.

You can greatly assist our ongoing efforts by contributing your lived experiences to our anonymous survey Psychological Safety. We would love to expand our dataset to be able to compare differences between various sectors in the economy and between the lived experiences in different geographies.

Demographics

Baseline across all professions

The demographics of marginalising categories across all professions within our database:

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals

The intersectionality of marginalising categories amongst Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people across all professions within our database:

How safe do you feel at work?

Baseline across all professions

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals

Baseline across all professions

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals

Baseline across all professions

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals

Baseline across all professions

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals

Safety of clinical work environments

Demographics

Healthcare professionals

The demographics of marginalising categories amongst the healthcare professionals within our database:

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals

The intersectionality of marginalising categories amongst Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals within our database:

How safe do you feel at work?

Healthcare professionals

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals

Healthcare professionals

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals

Healthcare professionals

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals

Healthcare professionals

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals

Conclusions

Safety of intersectionally marginalised people

Across the board, many – if not most Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people do not feel safe within their families, amongst their friends, and at work.

As to be expected, compared to other spheres of life, Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people tend to feel safest with their life partner.

More than 40% of Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people do not have a life partner. Around half of these 40% likely don’t have any accessible social sphere in which they can feel genuinely safe.

Prevelance of trauma

In our survey data, over 85% of Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people often or always feel misunderstood, and the same number often or always feel overwhelmed. Over 60% of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people often or always have at least five negative feelings, in addition to the above, feeling unsafe, insecure, and disrespected. Furthermore over 40% often or always feel bullied/manipulated and abandoned, and 32% indicate that they often or always feel betrayed.

93% of the Neurodivergent respondents to our Feeling Safe survey identify as Autistic. This means that the demographics of our data show the large overlap and the intersectionality between Autistic communities, and the LGBTQIA+ and Disabled communities.

In our survey data 56% of Autistic people also identify as Disabled, and 53% number identify as LGBTQIA+. This means the majority of Autistic people are intersectionally marginalised. We are are part of an easily overlooked minority within the Disabled and LGBTQIA+ communities.

Given this context, it is no surprise that complex trauma is very common amongst Autistic people, and that this is reflected in our mental health statistics.

Our survey data indicated that 82% of Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent people often or always experience anxiety. 63% often or always suffer from burnout, 57% often or always suffer from stress related health problems, 52% often or always suffer from insomnia, and 45% often or always feel depressed.

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled patients

The vast majority of healthcare professionals are ignorant not only about Autistic culture and Autistic ways of being, they are also ignorant about the prevelance of complex trauma amongst intersectionally marginalised people, and this ignorance is reflected in the lived experience reports we are receiving from Autistic and otherwise Neurodivergent patients.

The biggest fears of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled people relate to:

  1. unmet healthcare needs (65%)
  2. their work environment (64%)
  3. their parents (54%)
  4. disrespect by healthcare professionals (46%)

In comparison, the numbers of those whose greatest fears relate to other social spheres are much lower:

  1. friends (22%)
  2. siblings (22%)
  3. life partner (18%)
  4. children (7%)

It is very clear that healthcare settings are consistently experienced as highly unsafe by Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled patients.

This is also reflected in the experiences submitted in the qualitative parts of our surveys and in the in-depth lived experience reports we receive. Consistently, over 75% of the responses we receive to our ongoing Feeling Safe survey include examples of traumatising experiences in healthcare settings that no one should ever experience.

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals

Many Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals often or always feel unsafe amongst peers, superiors, and suppliers, in some aspects of work more than 50% or more of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled professionals often or always feel unsafe.

Across the board, the level of psychological safety amongst Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled workers is much lower than the level of psychological safety amongst workers in general.

Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals

50% or more of Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals often or always feel unsafe amongst peers, superiors, and patients, noticeably more so than their non/less-marginalised colleagues.

Even though according to our survey data, the psychological safety experienced across all healthcare healthcare professionals is slightly lower than in many other industries, this lack of safety is consistently highest amongst Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals. In particular more Neurodivergent, LGBTQIA+ and Disabled healthcare professionals indicate that they are:

  1. always afraid to be their authentic self at work
  2. always afraid to make mistakes at work
  3. always afraid to disagree with their peers and their patients

Next steps

Contribute to our Dr. B. Educated participatory research

Participate in our anonymous surveys, submit lived experience reports, and encourage your colleagues, families, and friends to participate.

Feeling Safe – This 5 minute anonymous survey (fourteen questions) is conducted by the Autistic Collaboration Trust and is sponsored by S23M.

Feeling Safe Growing Up – This 5 minute anonymous survey (fifteen questions) is conducted by the Autistic Collaboration Trust and is sponsored by S23M.

Regularly attend our Dr. B. Educated courses

If you are a medical doctor or allied healthcare professional, join our Dr. B. Educated courses as part of your Continuous Professional Development (CPD) efforts.

Our courses are taught by neurodivergent educators, allow you to learn from our unique database of lived experiences, and provide interactive opportunities to learn from and with members of the intersectional AutCollab community.

Regularly attend our education courses for educators

If you are a teacher or education professional, join our education courses for educators as part of your Continuous Professional Development (CPD) efforts.

Our courses are taught by neurodivergent educators and provide interactive opportunities to learn from and with members of the intersectional AutCollab community.

Onwards! – The AutCollab Education Team.