Autistic human animals – a factor in cultural metamorphosis

Autistic culture is a world of infinite diversity beyond the neuronormative imagination. Every Autistic relationship is unique, and many of us are traumatised. We need appropriate tools to invest in deeply understanding each other. Cultural metamorphosis requires radically reframing everything we understand about cultural adaptivity in terms of co-creating ecologies of care.

In the times we live in the demand for peer support and reliable emotional support routinely outstrips the available supply. This is reflected in overall mental health statistics, in the level of burnout, and we also see it in the quantitative and qualitative results of AutCollab Research. This article is motivated by the common reality of Autistic emotional exhaustion and lack of adequate peer support, as well as by the massive trust problems created by homo economicus.

My writing, trying to make sense of the cruel dystopian world we have been born into, and trying to articulate potential avenues that allow us collectively to jointly co-create ecologies of care, takes a lot of energy, in particular emotional energy. No one can do this alone. I certainly can’t and I don’t pretend I can. I need faith in humanity to write what I write, and this faith is based entirely on a small number of amazing Autistic human animals in my immediate ecology of care. For this I am immensely grateful every day.

The modern world needs more intersectional solidarity across all dimensions, more dialogues, more transparency, and more compassion. In short we need to invest in deeply understanding each other, and this is what we are increasingly seeing on the margins of society.

In the socially toxic world of homo economicus, many of the basic relationship building, maintenance, and repair skills have been lost or have become rare. To relearn these skills, we need an Autistic Relationship Manual (an ARM), connected to a helping hand and a compassionate heart, which can be only provided by our uniquely amazing Autistic peers. This article can be thought of as an ARM.

Cultural metamorphosis

Cultural metamorphosis is a radical form of collaborative niche construction that requires us to reframe everything we understand about the cultural adaptivity that is at our disposal at human scale. 

Homo economicus has pushed all life affirming human cultures beyond the cut-off points of the anthropocentric bell curve. The hump of the anthropocentric bell curve has become a hypernormative cultural dead zone paralysed by sanctified institutionalised BS.

Cultural healing requires the kind of deep and profound shift in trust from established institutions towards mutual aid and the community co-creation at human scale that indigenous Mexican scholar Yuria Celidwen talks about: 

We need commitment, we need community. We need to create spaces of trust. But for that, there’s tremendous work that we need to be doing. But I don’t think that any of that work will be possible, should we not have that commitment–that commitment that no matter how challenging and tremendously difficult it will be to reckon with these narratives and to dismantle these narratives. Because seeing the horror in the eye of all these narratives that we live by comes with tremendous understanding. It will leave us very fragile, very vulnerable, and most, of course, are not willing to do that, because we don’t feel safe. But if we are able to stand the heat and create these spaces, if we commit to do this kind of work for the benefit of the planet, then we may be able to learn that we can fly.

This shift in trust is already happening outside established institutions. It can only happen via self-selected and self-organising groups. I sense this is what we are already starting to experience on the intersectional margins of modern societies.

The objective of the Autistic Relationship Manual is to get people to start talking again, to catalyse further intersectional dialoges, and to let go of unwarranted fears and unwarranted shame, whether this is due to trauma or inhumane hypernormative culturally imposed expectations.

Metamorphosis back to human scale can be imagined as a cultural development stage for global intersectional and neurodivergent solidarity beyond the human, undoing some of the harm perpetuated in throughout the colonial and neocolonial era, at least for the generations alive today.

In the context of cultural metamorphosis, Autistic human animals are the imaginal cells within human scale cultural organisms. Globally, there are a few hundred million of us, spread across all continents and bioregional ecosystems, and this number does not even include the many hundred million of otherwise neurodivergent human animals. Autistic human animals tend to be highly concerned about social justice and tend to be the ones who point out toxic in-group competitive behaviours. We assist each other in co-creating unique Autistic relationships, households, and human scale cultural organisms. We co-create our unique families in our own space and time.

Yes, real change takes real courage. It shakes the very foundations of people’s understanding of the world. In difference to what Adam Curtis is hoping for, what we are seeing at the grassroots level are millions of beautifully diverse small green shoots at human scale. This is deep change, beyond any centralised powers of control.

In the context of healthy egalitarian human ecologies, Autistic human animals are best understood as the agents of a well functioning cultural immune system within society.

Autistic

The unusual heightened baseline sensitivity profiles of Autistic human animals means that they have a reduced capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance.

Autistic human animals are unconstrained by culturally defined gender norms and have the capacity to relate deeply to other human and non-human living beings. Their sensitivity profiles limit their ability to think hierarchically and engage in transactional human busyness.

In the hypernormative culture that dominates the modern world, it is hard to explain to non-Autistic people what the immersion in healthy Autistic culture feels like and what the development of healthy sacred lifetime relationships between Autistic people feels like. In mainstream society people don’t understand how Autistic human animals support each other, love each other, and care for each other in ways that go far beyond the culturally impaired neuronormative imagination.

Human

It should not require mentioning, but in the hyper-normative modern social world, it must be stated and emphasised that Autistic human animals are fully human.

As humans we share an evolved capacity for developing and maintaining cultures and languages. These capacities allow humans to collaborate in flexible and complex ways based on shared intentions, a shared understanding of each other, and a shared understanding of our ecological context.

Our capacities for culture and language allow us to establish and maintain commitments to each other and commitments across human scale groups. Such verbal or written commitments constitute an effective human scale cultural framework for coordinating human social affairs.

Breaking our commitments makes us physically, mentally, and spiritually sick. Humans evolved this way. This is how we have become cultural organisms. Fully acknowledging this evolutionary heritage we must conclude:

Every relationship is sacred. No one should ever be discarded. This also extends to non-human living beings. No life should ever be discarded. We honour Gaia by appreciating all the living food she provides us with by committing to nurturing and helping all those living beings that sustain us.

Beyond our capacity for culture and language humans have an evolved capacity for pair bonding within the context of human scale groups, which can be understood as networks of sacred relationships, each of which encapsulates unique shared experiences.

Animals

In the anthropocentric modern social world, it must be reiterated that all human are animals.

Just like all other animals, humans engage in sexual activities, and we do so in very diverse ways. As human animals, our capacities for culture and language have greatly increased the complexity of our sexual imagination, and this plays out in the infinite complexity in sexual behaviour and rituals that are found in different cultures.

Please note that Western Educated Industrialised Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) cultures have not “cornered the market” of cultural gender identities and sexual preferences. Attempting to impose WEIRD cultural norms on other groups is a form of neocolonialism.

Similar comments apply to the cultures of all super-human scale groups such as modern nation states and corporations. Such modern legal fictions are incompatible with our human evolutionary history, and “universally applicable” social norms defined by such entities are causing untold harm on a daily basis.

Acknowledging that humans are animals includes acknowledging the absolute cognitive and emotional limits shared by all humans. In terms of our cognitive and emotional capacities and limitations, we are all much closer to each other than most of us are ever ready to admit.

Being conscious animals helps us regain some urgently needed humility, and should encourage all of us to honour Gaia on a daily basis.

Relational building blocks

Every relationship between humans is sacred, and every relationship is unique. There are no cookie cutters that work for everyone. However there are relational building blocks that can be used to articulate the unique commitments, preferences, and needs that define a relationship.

The ability to extend trust

The ability to extend trust is defined by the health of the ecology of care we are embedded in. Autistic human animals who are embedded in Autistic culture and a reasonably healthy ecology of care tend to extend deep trust, especially to other Autistic human animals.

In our times this is an increasingly rare sacred gift, which is easily exploited in unsafe environments dominated by internalised ableism. Carefully nurturing and protecting these gifts is a collective responsibility within Autistic cultural organisms. There is beautiful work for us to do.

Too many Autists end up isolated, in particular those who have a calling to be activists, who are so sensitive that they can not bear all the suffering in the world. No one chooses to be highly sensitive. No one chooses a calling. We are born this way. And we are fully human animals, with human needs. We are Autistic. We are not broken. To thrive we need to be embedded in a healthy ecology of care.

Too many of us die completely misunderstood. Many of us remember dear friends who are no longer amongst us. 

Deep mutual trust is a priceless collective asset that is increasingly providing healthy Autistic cultural organisms with a unique collaborative advantage over traditional family systems and organisational forms.

Shared understanding

Some level of shared understanding is a prerequisite for any relationship to even get started. For example in this context it helps to know if the person you would like to form a relationship with is an Autistic human animal, as this can greatly reduce the effort and energy needed for communication.

Shared value priorities

Most humans, even across cultures, share many similarities in values. What really matters for relational health is transparency and clarity about the relative priorities of the values that matter most to us.

Shared interests

Shared interests are part of the bedrock of relationships between Autistic human animals, much more so than between non-Autistic human animals, who tend to have much broader interests in topics shaped by the surrounding culture, and a less deep interest or understanding of the topics they are happy to engage in.

When multiple interests are shared between Autistic human animals, it can result in unique friendships and romantic partnerships that go far beyond the limited neuronormative imagination of what is possible.

Complementary interests

Complementary interests are an optional part of the bedrock of relationships between Autistic human animals, more so than between non-Autistic human animals. Mutual respect and curiosity about complementary interests predisposes Autistic human animals towards collaborative niche construction and the formation of unique human scale cultural organisms.

Sexual preferences

Sexual preferences are an essential building block for all romantic partnerships.

Western Educated Industrialised Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) cultures have not “cornered the market” of sexual preferences. Attempting to impose WEIRD cultural norms on other groups is a form of neocolonialism.

Relax! When two Autistic animals meet, be prepared to be surprised and delighted!

Gender preferences

Gender preferences are an optional building block for romantic partnerships with Autistic human animals.

Hardly anything in the biosphere is binary. Yet the entire global digital edifice is built from zeros and ones. What could possibly go wrong? A substantial number of Autistic human animals identify as non-binary and have difficulty comprehending the concept of culturally defined gender norms for ways of pair bonding.

Western Educated Industrialised Rich and Democratic (WEIRD) cultures have not “cornered the market” of cultural gender identities. Attempting to impose WEIRD cultural norms on other groups is a form of neocolonialism.

In wider society gender expectations represent a minefield for Autistic human animals. A substantial number of Autistic human animals are equally uncomfortable with the both binary genders and corresponding cultural behavioural expectations. I have no idea of what others expect from me or what to expect from them if they identify as one of the two default binary genders. Every relationship is unique, and develops in a unique way. Cookie cutters don’t make sense to me.

Relax! When two Autistic animals meet, conformance with any WEIRD gender norms are often one of the least relevant aspects of the relationship.

Relational health

Every relationship between humans is sacred, and every relationship is unique.

The health of a relationship can be defined as the absence of cognitive dissonance in relating to the relationship from the perspectives of both parties to the relationship. It is sufficient for one person in a relationship to experience cognitive dissonance for the relationship to become strained.

The WEIRD modern social world many people were born into today has destroyed the collective ability for deliberation at human scale. As a result modern life is experienced as incoherent from the individual perspective, which is subconsciously attempting to generate coherence at human scale. When that process fails, nothing seems to make sense anymore

The modern social world we live in can only be understood from the margins, because the very notion of sense making has been confused. This is no surprise, because our capacity for sense making operates at human scale.

Essential sacred commitments

There are no cookie cutters that work for everyone. However there are essential commitments that are part or the foundation of all healthy relationships.

  1. Availability – both parties are committed to a comparable level of their availability to the relationship, which is determined by level of intensity of the relationship, which in turn is shaped by agreed mutual commitments.
  2. Full transparency – both parties need are committed to full transparency across all aspects of the relationship, which are determined by level of intimacy of the relationship, which in turn is shaped by agreed mutual commitments. Of course full transparency means that some things may become impossible, and then one or more relationships in an ecology of care may need to evolve, including shifts in the circles of intimacy as needed. There is no need to discard any relationship. A binary all or nothing approach is a symptom of living in a toxic transactional culture.
  3. Compassion – both parties are committed to mutual compassion across all aspects of the relationship to an extent that reflects the level of intimacy of the relationship, which in turn is shaped by agreed mutual commitments.
  4. Fairness – both parties are committed to egalitarian norms of fairness across all aspects of the relationship.
  5. Conflict prevention & resolution – both parties are committed to promptly sharing and addressing cognitive dissonance when it occurs in any aspect of the relationship.

Unique sacred commitments

Beyond the five essential commitments, the foundation of every relationships is defined by further bespoke sacred commitments that reflect the uniqueness and the level of intimacy and maturity of the relationship.

Jointly developing and evolving sacred commitment is an important part of collaborative niche construction that requires us to

  1. Communicate our needs and preference unambiguously
  2. Learn to respect the unique needs and preference of others
  3. Use dialogue to arrive at a point of shared understanding that eliminates cognitive dissonance for all parties involved

If cognitive dissonance remains in a relationship, it indicates a difference in sensitivity profiles. Reflect on whether it is conceivable that preferences converge over time or whether the cognitive dissonance is sustainable on an ongoing basis – it likely isn’t.

Therefore resolve cognitive dissonance by increasing your shared understanding, and rely on genuine compassion to adapt your preferences. The result is a unique relationship, defined by a unique set of mutual commitments and mutual respect.

Communication skills

Once relational health is understood in terms of absence of cognitive dissonance in a relationship, it becomes clear that all relationship problems can be analysed and understood in terms of communication failures.

Such failures need to be addressed by mastering and applying the essential communication skills needed to co-create, nurture, and as needed repair relational health.

  1. De-powered dialogue – is the skill to engage in dialogue that remains free of social power dynamics, i.e. both parties actively avoid unilaterally imposing arbitrary demands or making use of coercive techniques. This skill can also be understood as the commitment to non-violent communication. Continuous dialogue in combination with commitments to transparency and compassion for each other allows almost all relationship problems to be worked out.
  2. Consultation – involves the practice of always asking the other party for advice before making any decision that may affect the other party or the scope of the relationship in a significant way. The practice of consultation does not imply an expectation that all advice received must be followed, it is best understood as a commitment to mutual learning and as a tool for activating the compassion needed to maintain the relationship.
  3. Conflict resolution – involves the consistent application of the conflict resolution strategies and tools that have been agreed in mutual commitments. In the case of reoccurring conflicts, it may be necessary to revisit and as needed update mutual commitments to avoid cognitive dissonance from becoming established.
  4. Open Space facilitation – is an essential skill when embarking on economic partnerships. Deliberation in open space is the foundation for omnidirectional learning, for arriving at consensus based decisions without generating cognitive dissonance, and it allows groups to address potentially wicked problems.
  5. Care circle facilitation – is an essential skill for the activation of compassion and related skills for reducing cognitive dissonance and restoring emotional energy levels.

The social motivation of Autistic human animals is deeply rooted in the desire to share knowledge and in the desire to learn, and this has big implications for the communication protocols that are used in Autistic culture. Very similar to hunter-gatherer societies, egalitarian Autistic cultural organisms are highly expert in group deliberation and decision-making which respects both difference and unity.

The topic of communication problems and failures in the context or relationships is broad and deep. It is complicated by internalised ableism, i.e. the communication habits for “success” mandated by homo economicus.

Hyper-competitive cultures value abstract social status symbols more than developing a shared understanding. This leads to entirely predictable yet unavoidable communication challenges that define Autistic social experiences. Ambiguity and plausible deniability is essential to “win” in social games. The objective of clear communication and the desire to be understood gets replaced by a desire to be perceived in a certain way, and a desire to “influence” people in certain ways for personal advantage.

When modern humans spend 8 to 16 hours per day in hyper-competitive work places and in consumer oriented digital spaces, ambiguous and deceptive forms of communication start to bleed into all aspects of life, resulting in a form of spiritual bankruptcy in which human spirits have been fused to the misguided fiction of homo economicus, resulting in chronic “normalised” cognitive dissonance.

Energy management

Our cognitive and emotional limits and reserves can be understood, quantified, and communicated in terms of energy spoons, for example by agreeing that 1 spoon = 1 hour of dedicated time.

Human minds are the tools that connect the physical dimension of our existence to other living creatures, and to a rich internal spiritual world, which integrates our own perceptions into a seemingly coherent representation of the external world around us. Human minds can develop amazing capabilities, but at the same time, our cognitive and emotional capacities are limited.

All our activities affect the levels of three complementary energy reservoirs:

  1. Our reservoir of emotional (relational) spoons
  2. Our reservoir of creative (internal) spoons
  3. Our reservoir of labour (physical) spoons

The above diagram illustrates how these energy reservoirs are connected to dialogues, communication in open space, and routines in the physical environment to regulate emotions and stress.

  1. We recharge our creative and emotional (relational) batteries by exhausting our physical batteries
  2. We recharge our creative and physical batteries by exhausting our emotional (relational) batteries
  3. We recharge our emotional (relational) and physical batteries by exhausting our creative batteries
  4. Additionally Our emotional (relational) batteries can also be recharged when all participants contribute comparable numbers of emotional spoons to a dialogue or a dedicated circle of care

Sacred relationships

You have a full relationship driver’s license when you have established one or more lifetime friendships, partnerships, or romantic partnerships.

Sacred relationships are the fundamental building blocks of life. This extends to all living beings that are part of Gaia. When it comes to relationships between humans, there are three different categories of relationships that we can trace back to our evolutionary heritage.

  1. Romantic partnerships are the pair bonds that originally served the purpose of sexual reproduction.
  2. Partnerships are the pair bonds that originally served the purpose of egalitarian resource sharing within the context of human scale bands of hunter gatherers.
  3. Friendships are the pair bonds that originally served the purpose of omnidirectional learning and mutual aid between human scale bands of hunter gatherers.

Note that these categories intentionally avoid the arbitrary distinction between “work” and the rest of life, which has only been invented to make the inhumane fiction of homo economicus tolerable for large parts of our lives. The resulting alienation and required split in our daily modus operandi of social affairs is a major contributor to the so-called mental health crisis, alongside the human created metacrisis that now has become and existential threat for our species and for many other species.

In this Autistic Relationship Manual (ARM) we define relationship driver’s license levels that can help us to incrementally relearn basic relationship building, maintenance, and repair skills and minimise human and non-human suffering during the unique cultural metamorphosis that is unfolding.

Since all human relationships involve two people, certification at any level is incredibly straight forward, a particular level is reached if the two humans that constitute the relationship certify the level to each other.

Certification of a learner license is a simple commitment to each other to learn from and with each other on the journey towards a full license.

Certification of a full license is the set of all the commitments to each other that are reached after seven years on a learner license.

Lived experience shows that any relationship that is still intact after 7 years is a lifetime relationship or has the potential to be a lifetime relationship. This holds for romantic partnerships as well as economic partnerships and friendships.

The guidelines articulated in this article are based on more than five decades of lived experience, including the development of an organically growing number of lifetime friendships, a long term romantic partnership that got reconfigured into a local economic partnership, and over 12 years of nurturing and operating a cosmolocal egalitarian human scale worker coop, i.e. the collective experience of a lifetime economic partnership between close friends.

The key to relational health is mastery of the relationship repair and reconfiguration skills needed to reduce and eliminate cognitive dissonance experienced by one or both humans in the relationship. Cognitive dissonance manifests in emotional pain. If allowed to persist it can become a chronic disease and a silent killer of a relationship.

The three categories of scared relationships usually build on each other, i.e. a friendship can evolve into an economic partnership, which in turn can evolve into a romantic partnership. Evolution is ongoing, and transitions between categories can occur on both a learner license or on a full license, and in both directions, depending on whether the level of intimacy and depth of collaboration is going up or down.

Across the board, along the journey so far, all relationships that completely expired and discontinued were relationships with institutions and humans trapped in the hypernormative world of homo economicus, i.e examples that illustrate the transactional and ultimately self-destructive nature of homo economicus.

Mastery of relationship repair and reconfiguration skills allows mature relationships that have lasted at least 7 years to be maintained indefinitely. It is a matter of being able to identify and address cognitive dissonance in a timely manner, on an ongoing basis, and as needed to step up or step down the intimacy level of the relationship to eliminate cognitive dissonance.

This relational approach to life is incompatible with the transactional cultural frame of homo economicus.

Relearning and mastering the relational approach to life is at the core of the cultural metamorphosis that the human species is currently undergoing.

Sensitive Autistic animals see and feel the pain of others, this compels us to help, this compels us to fight for social justice and for the overall wellbeing of Gaia. We see the trauma behind internalised ableism. We are in pain because we feel the pain of others.

Within the modern world, hypersensitive Autistic human animals are traumatised from a very young age. In particular all children are exposed in Homo Economicus from a very young age, by well intentioned parents and educators, before we learn anything substantial about Gaia and the living world. This is possibly the most cruel, dehumanising, and life denying part of the modern world. 

So far, metamorphosis is confined to millions of embryonic human scale sprouts growing in the compost heap of homo economicus, engaging in omnidirectional learning. Increasingly these sprouts are connecting, resulting in the evolution of cosmolocal networks of friends on the margins of modern societies.

Friendship

You have a full friendship license if you have one or more lifetime friends in accordance with your emotional support needs.

Be honest with yourself and others when your friendship is at risk of expiring.

A friendship only expires if you have allowed cognitive dissonance to fester and become chronic. As needed join a circle or care for peer support in relationship repair and reconfiguration skills. Doing this early enough or on-demand can help preserve and nurture your precious friendships, for example by learning how to evolve the commitments that underpin the friendship to eliminate the cognitive dissonance that strains the relationship.

Partnership

You have a full partnership license if you have one or more lifetime friends that you collaborate with on livelihood co-creation and egalitarian resource sharing.

Be honest with yourself and others when your partnership is at risk of expiring.

A partnership only expires if you have allowed cognitive dissonance to fester and become chronic. As needed join an open space for peer support in partnership repair and reconfiguration skills. Doing this early enough or on-demand can help preserve and nurture your precious partnership, for example by learning how to evolve the commitments that underpin the partnership to eliminate the cognitive dissonance that strains the relationship.

Romantic partnership

You have a full romantic partnership license if you have one or more romantic partners that you share your life with in accordance with your emotional support needs and sexual preferences.

Be honest with yourself and others when your romantic partnership is at risk of expiring.

A romantic partnership only expires if you have allowed cognitive dissonance to fester and become chronic. As needed join a circle or care for peer support in relationship repair and reconfiguration skills. Doing this early enough or on-demand can help preserve and nurture your precious friendships, for example by learning how to evolve the commitments that underpin the romantic partnership to eliminate the cognitive dissonance that strains the relationship.

Therapeutic relationships

You don’t yet have the full relationship driver’s license if you are still on a learner license, i.e. you have yet to establish one or more lifetime friendships, partnerships, and romantic partnerships.

As needed, join a circle of care to learn how to muster the courage to embark on a learners license for friendship or romantic partnerships, or join a creative open space collaboration to learn how to muster the courage to embark on a learners license for economic partnerships.

Therapeutic friendship

A therapeutic friendship is a form of learning by doing in which you incrementally learn how to co-create and nurture lifetime friendships to meet each others emotional needs.

Be honest with yourself and fully transparent with your friend as soon as cognitive dissonance emerges. This is an opportunity for both of you to learn basic relationship repair and reconfiguration skills.

The bedrock of all relationships is the ability to engage in deliberative dialogue to confirm a shared understanding of the shared value priorities and the shared interests that define the friendship, and then to articulate this shared understanding in terms of mutual commitments.

As needed join a circle or care for peer support in relationship repair and reconfiguration skills. Doing this early enough or on-demand can help preserve and nurture your precious friendship.

Therapeutic partnership

A therapeutic partnership is an on-boarding process in which you incrementally learn how to co-create livelihoods and nurture lifetime egalitarian resource sharing partnerships.

Be honest with yourself and fully transparent with your partners as soon as cognitive dissonance emerges. This is an opportunity for all of you to learn basic relationship repair and reconfiguration skills.

A partnership only expires if a team has allowed cognitive dissonance to fester and become chronic. Partnership health is maintained by operating an ongoing advice process on an ongoing basis regarding all decisions that can affect others in major ways, and by regularly meeting in open space to coordinate activities and as needed revisit priorities to adapt to changes in the wider ecological context.

As needed join an open space for peer support in partnership repair and reconfiguration skills. Doing this early enough or on-demand can help preserve and nurture your precious partnership, for example by learning how to evolve the commitments that underpin the partnership to prevent cognitive dissonance and misunderstandings from building up.

Therapeutic romantic partnership

A therapeutic romantic partnership is a form of learning by doing in which you incrementally learn how to co-create and nurture lifetime friendships that include meeting each others sexual needs and needs for intimate affection.

Be honest with yourself and fully transparent with your romantic partner(s) as soon as cognitive dissonance emerges. This is an opportunity for all of you to learn basic relationship repair and reconfiguration skills.

A romantic partnership only expires in case you allow cognitive dissonance to fester and become chronic. As needed join a circle or care for peer support to learn about relationship repair and reconfiguration skills and, ideally jointly, explore how to apply these skills to your romantic partnership.

Doing this early enough or on-demand can help preserve and nurture your romantic partnership, for example by learning how to articulate emotional needs, manage and regenerate your emotional energies, and jointly evolve the commitments that underpin the romantic partnership to eliminate any cognitive dissonance that strains the relationship.

Toxic relationships

Your relationships are at risk of becoming toxic if you don’t have a relationship driver’s license and are too afraid to embark on a learners license, yet still proceed to establish friendships, partnerships, and romantic partnerships.

In this scenario you need to learn to be more honest and compassionate with yourself and the people you attempt to co-create relationships with.

Be gentle with yourself. Don’t beat yourself up. You are a sacred Autistic human animal. You are part of Gaia, and there are always people who deeply care about all aspects of your wellbeing. You may just not yet be clear about who these people are or where or how to find them.

It is when “relationships” become things to acquire and potentially discard that things become toxic. In the fast-paced hyper-competitive world of homo economicus the art of evolving, reconfiguring, and repairing relationships has been lost or is underdeveloped.

Homo economicus takes a transactional approach to all aspects of life, and thereby it fully “normalises” economic and emotional exploitation. This traumatises hypersensitive Autistic human animals and sets them up for recurring exploitation and the disastrous effects of chronic cognitive dissonance throughout life.

A commitment to activism, unlimited compassion for all living beings, and a seemingly self-destructive ability to extend and re-extend deep trust is the only healthy viable survival strategy. In a healthy society hypersensitive Autistic human animals help prevent the worst parts of our evolutionary heritage from overshadowing the strong uniquely human collaborative tendencies that distinguish us from other primates.

To be clear, the emergence and prevalence of toxic relationships is entirely a cultural issue, it is an issue of extreme social inequalities, hyper-competitive social norms, and an issue of (neo)colonialism. It is not an issue that can be blamed on specific individuals. Many people live in seriously toxic cultural environments. The emotional pain of trauma prevents them from being honest with themselves and others. They know of no other patterns, and deep down shame is a big issue. Sadly, in the modern world, psychologically genuinely safe relationships have become rare.

In a genuinely safe relationship there is no need to keep fears to yourself, or to feel ashamed to ask questions or articulate your needs.

As needed join a circle of care to learn how to muster the courage and learn the basic skills to embark on a learner license for friendship or romantic partnerships, or join a creative open space collaboration to learn how to muster the courage to embark on a learner license and learn the basic skills for operating economic partnerships and egalitarian worker coops.

Toxic friendship

A friendship that is at risk of becoming toxic lacks one or more of the essential sacred commitments to meet each others emotional needs.

Don’t lightly throw away your friendships! Learn how to repair, reconfigure, and upgrade your friendships before they become toxic beyond repair.

Toxic partnership

An economic partnership that is at risk of becoming toxic often lacks one or more of the essential sacred commitments towards egalitarian resource sharing.

Embarking on a genuine economic partnership, especially with more than two people, is possibly one of the most difficult ventures that modern humans can attempt, as it involves unlearning all the toxic cultural assumptions that have been shaped by the religion of homo economicus.

And yet, or rather precisely for that reason, it is becoming an increasingly relevant basic life skill within the compost heap of modern industrialised societies.

To avoid partnerships from becoming toxic, it is necessary to learn how go through fire, to have difficult conversations that most people never dare to have, to either come out with all relationships intact at the other end, or to know how to arrive at a consensus about the relationships within the partnership that have become toxic beyond repair. In this process, all affected parties need to come to the table, and appropriate peer support from those with relevant lived experience needs to be in place to bear the emotional load.

Toxic romantic partnership

A romantic partnership that is at risk of becoming toxic lacks one or more of the essential sacred commitments to meet each others sexual needs and needs for intimate affection.

Embarking on a romantic partnership is the second most difficult venture that modern humans can attempt, only slightly behind embarking on a (multi) lifetime economic partnership, as it involves unlearning many of the toxic cultural assumptions that have been shaped by the religion of homo economicus.

Relearning how to co-create, nurture, and repair loving and caring romantic partnerships is becoming an increasingly relevant basic life skill within the compost heap of modern industrialised societies.

To avoid a romantic partnerships from becoming toxic, it is necessary to learn how go through fire, to have difficult conversations that many people never dare to have. In this process, both parties need to come to the table, as needed with appropriate peer support from those with relevant lived experience, to bear the emotional load.

In a genuinely psychologically genuinely safe romantic partnership there is no need to keep your fears to yourself, or to feel ashamed of anything that may have happened to you, that you may have done, or that you may feel.

For Autistic human animals it is important to be fully aware of the beautiful infinite diversity and possibilities of Autistic relationships. This can not be reiterated often enough. We are not limited to the WEIRD culturally defined sexual preference norms and gender norms.

Join us!

Autistic, Authentic, and Autonomous ecologies of care beyond the human grow organically, at human scale, at a human pace, one trusted relationship at a time. Join us!

The world in reality is a beautifully interconnected world, and it’s interconnected through many many layers. It’s interconnected through consciousness, which is why we are spiritual beings in human form. But the plants outside my window are spiritual beings in plant form. But the plant of the lychee is in lychee form, and the tree of the mango is in mango form. They are just different expressions of one spiritual interconnected consciousness in the world.

– Vandana Shiva

The ability to relate deeply is the inability to conduct transactional busyness

Underneath the surface of internalised ableism, no one wants to be seen and heard by many. Everyone prefers to be understood and loved deeply by a few, and everyone wants to love and help. This is what makes us sacred human animals. Continuous dialogues about commitments make life sacred. This is how humans create meaning for each other and with each other. This is the experience of life as a process of becoming.

Following the recent article on the inability of many Autists to think in terms of social hierarchies, a timely submission for the next NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity in December 2024 landed in the AutCollab inbox:

I’m the founder of a neurodivergent community and also a therapist and indigenous person. I’m interested in how to promote mutual aid within our community, when there is a lot of interpersonal trauma including difficulty with trust for many. 

The social challenges described and foreseen in Guy Debord’s and George Orwell’s work have become a highly disturbing reality, especially for cultural minorities and intersectionally marginalised populations. Early indoctrination in the belief in homo economicus attempts to transform humans into soulless machines. In particular, for many Autists, and possibly for everyone, the more we have an ability to relate to other humans and non-human living beings the less we are able to conduct transactional busyness.

Underneath the surface of internalised ableism, the following observation applies to all sober humans.

No one wants to be seen and heard by many. Everyone prefers to be understood and loved deeply by a few, and everyone wants to love and help. This is what makes us sacred human animals.

Commitments make us uniquely human

There is one healthy way forward, which is accessible on the basis of mutual trust and shared values, which involves a shift towards shared beliefs that represent sacred commitments at human scale:

Sacred commitments between specific people or across human scale groups can be verbal or in writing. They only scale up to the limited numbers of relationships that we can maintain. As needed we can jointly update these commitments to reflect evolving needs or constraints in the wider ecology we are embedded in. For those who identify as Autistic, a significant number of beliefs held fall into this category, especially agreements with family members, friends, and colleagues.

The massive trust problems created by homo economicus, the implications of which are well explained by the combination of Debord and Orwell, are cultural beliefs based on what others have encouraged us to believe, including beliefs that we have absorbed from from our social environment subconsciously, i.e. beliefs for which we can’t recall the origin. For those who do not identify as Autistic, the majority of beliefs held may fall into this category.

Unilateral commitments with ourselves act as our spiritual commitment to life and to Gaia.

Breaking our commitments makes us physically, mentally, and spiritually sick. Humans evolved this way. This is how we have become cultural organisms.

Bilateral commitments that are offered by one party are sacred invitations to others, as part our spiritual commitment to and recognition of the sanctity of all relationships with living beings. Both parties can make sacred invitations, and then they can be brought together, as needed via deliberative dialogue, in love and mutual respect and understanding, into the sacred form that becomes a spiritual commitment to each other.

In contrast to the practices in the industrialised factory model of society, there are no simplistic cookie cutter commitments. Every commitment is tailored to a specific relationship, either with ourselves – and by extension with Gaia, or with others.

By sharing the commitments that we make with ourselves and with others within our ecology of care, we are able to better understand each other, trust each other, and rely on each other. This is of course easier said than done when the wider cultural context is dominated by individualism and mutual distrust.

Deliberative dialogue

Continuous dialogues about commitments are a beautiful part of lived Māori culture. This is how we can all honour life and Gaia.

This is what makes life sacred. This is how humans create meaning for each other and with each other. This is the experience of life as a process of becoming.

Explicit social agreements beyond human scale have severe limitations. This is why Māori have to engage in the cultural practices of collective action they have developed.

In hierarchically structured societies, agreements such as laws issued by regional or national authorities apply to large groups of people, and by necessity have been developed with limited input from those who are affected. Such agreements invariably cause untold harm that for the most part remains invisible to the authorities. Humans did not evolve to live in hierarchically structured super-human scale societies. Pretending that we can maintain such structures without causing untold harm is a form of anthropocentric hubris.

Trauma is propagated between generations. We have to find ways of breaking the cycle without destroying those who are the most sensitive, who are the ones capable of nurturing ecologies of care not based on power and manipulation. The question of the evil of coercive power has been with me since I was a child. Coercive power is the root of all evil. Those who are capable of resorting to coercive power on a regular basis are the ones destroying and killing the entire planet. There is infinite timeless wisdom in the social norm against the emergence of any social power gradients. When civilisations erase that norm, unimaginable suffering unfolds.

Autistic people often make sacred commitments to themselves at a young age to minimise cognitive dissonance. When we make sacred commitments to other people we often learn that not everyone honours their commitments, or rather we notice how many others seem to go through life without any genuinely sacred commitments or firm convictions.

In the modern socially hyper-competitive world experience with the practice of de-powered deliberative dialogue is very limited. Life without sacred commitments is experienced as empty and meaningless.

The religion of Homo economicus systematically generates lost souls, searching for meaning without a solid foundation that allows meaning to be found.

Co-creating ecologies of care

Sacred commitments based on a basis of deep mutual trust and shared values are the foundation of all healthy cultures.

De-powered dialogue to deepen shared understanding is the tool to maintain and evolve commitments on an ongoing basis, along the way deepening love, compassion and mutual trust in a virtuous cycle, even through the most difficult times. All indigenous cultures know this.

This is also what Māori culture is gifting to the world in these difficult times, which humans collectively have inflicted on Gaia in their culturally generated ignorance and arrogance.

Intersectional solidarity across indigenous rights movements, the neurodiversity movement, and the disability rights movement is at the core of healing from the cultural cancer that has caused the metacrisis.

This is not theory, this is consistent with our lived experiences in depowered egalitarian worker coops. De-powered dialogue, omnidirectional learning, and consensus based decisions shape our daily practice. This experience was the first part of my healing in a world dominated by the religion of homo economicus. 

Hunter-gatherers also engage in deliberative dialogue and reach decisions by consensus. It is beautiful. This is the art of living at human scale, as cultural organisms.

De-powered deliberative dialogues in a safe environment co-created by shared commitments allow us walk each others minds. In these dialogues we share what think, how we think, and what we believe in. We can also do this in writing. The important part is the commitment to ongoing dialogue, to share our inner worlds with each other. Of course all of this is completely incompatible with the religion of homo economicus. Yet this sharing is what our nervous systems evolved for! It is no surprise that many Autistic people are continuously operating at or beyond their emotional limits.

Furthermore, the more time we spend stuck in the digital world, separated by “interfaces”, the more the essential ability to extend deep trust has become an increasingly rare gift in our time.

Our nervous systems are deeply connected. We are embodied spirits, everything is connected. Interfaces limit our humanity. They are non-living anthropocentric machines. We evolved to be fully present with each other. This is what we know and feel deep down in our hearts.

Co-creating ecologies of care is sacred work. We can only do it together.

Onwards!

The inability to think hierarchically is the ability to think and live relationally

Many Autistic people have great difficulties to think of the world in hierarchical ways. From what we know about our evolutionary path as humans, this is a reflection of innate human collaborative cultural capabilities in combination with a much reduced capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance on an ongoing basis, which in turn can be traced to uncommon sensitivity profiles that fall outside the bell curve of hypernormativity.

When Autists learn about the social expectations that are attached to participating in and operating in hierarchically organised structures of social power, we have difficulty comprehending that such structures are considered acceptable. We are consciously aware of the pain and the potential we harm we can cause by exerting social power over others, as well the pain and cognitive dissonance that we experience when authorities impose arbitrarily demands on us that are incompatible with our unique individual sensitivity profiles.

Within the cultural frame of internalised ableism, the Autistic reluctance to exert social power over others is interpreted as a social deficit, i.s. as an inability to be entrusted with so called “leadership” responsibilities, and at the same time, the Autistic reluctance to submit to arbitrary social power is interpreted as a social deficit, i.e. as non-compliance, as disagreeableness, and as disrupting the “natural” social order.

This explains why in the context of some concrete social situations Autistic people are dismissed as being “weak or incompetent leaders”, and in other social contexts and situations the same Autistic people are dismissed and punished for being “aloof, arrogant, insensitive, and inappropriately competitive”. In many cases, both conclusions are completely misguided.

Instead, Autistic people are much better understood as vital parts of the cultural immune system of the human species. In the modern world Autistic people are well positioned to reimagine healthier collective ways of being and much healthier, human scale egalitarian cultural organisms.

The modern world is dominated by the state religion of Homo Economicus, in which the majority of people experience social hierarchies as a “law of nature”, justified as needed by correspondingly culturally biased evidence from disciplines such as economics, evolutionary biology, or Western psychology. The state religion of Homo Economicus is an outgrowth of a cultural heritage with roots in misguided anthropocentric interpretations of cultural frames found at the core of monotheistic Abrahamic religions. These interpretations have unfortunately risen to great heights in over the course of colonial and neocolonial history.

Traumatised Autistic people

Within the modern world, hypersensitive Autistic people are traumatised from a very young age. In particular all children are exposed in Homo Economicus from a very young age, by well intentioned parents and educators, before we learn anything substantial about Gaia and the living world. This is possibly the most cruel, dehumanising, and life denying part of the modern world. 

Especially if such early exposure to Homo Economicus is combined with social power dynamics in patriarchal and otherwise abusive family systems, children are severely traumatised. In such a context all children are at great risk of developing harmful trauma coping mechanisms, and this of course includes Autistic children.

Due to the unusual baseline sensitivity profiles and reduced capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance of Autistic children, it makes sense that traumatised Autistic children are more likely than other children to develop a deep distrust of all humans, to the point where they become unable to extend deep trust to anyone, including their closest family members.

Such highly traumatised Autistic children end up completely isolated. Their coping mechanism can be understood in the same way as the harmful coping mechanisms exhibited by traumatised people who are not Autistic, including bullying and extreme attempts at exerting control over family members, and thereby perpetuating inter-generational trauma. Autistic people are no less and no more likely than others to perpetuate trauma, and those who do, tend to differ from other abusers in terms of their reduced ability to maintain cognitive dissonance. This means their controlling agenda is completely open. Usually their desire for social control is limited to their immediate family system, and does not extend to the wider social sphere.

Much more often, due to their unusual sensitivity profiles, reduced inability to maintain cognitive dissonance, refusal to participate in social games in wider society, as well as refusal to submit to arbitrary unjustifiable demands from social authorities, Autistic people end up at the receiving end of bullying and other forms of abuse.

The level of early childhood trauma experienced by many Autistic people can severely impact their ability to extend trust to others and develop intimate relationships. Luckily this has started to change since the invention of the Internet, which has enabled Autistic people worldwide to connect and learn from each other. The Internet enabled many of those who were unable to relate to culturally “well adjusted” people to find, connect, and develop lifelong relationships based on compatible sensitivity profiles.

Sadly some positive developments have been compromised by the rise of profit-oriented commercial social media in the public sphere, with all its well known polarising and traumatising effects, including the active and deeply misguided encouragement to develop “super-human scale” social networks of “friends”.

Many Autistic people can’t help but viscerally feel the trauma and the pain they see, cutting right through all the layers of internalised ableism that others may have developed as a protective shield to cope in a cruel and dehumanising social world.

Our compassion with all living beings allows us to nurture unique relationships, and heal communities in ways that that have been suppressed and forgotten in hypernormative, life denying cultures.

Autistic culture

In recent years, thanks to innate reluctance or inability to participate in social games, Autistic people have shifted and are increasingly shifting towards genuinely human-scale online spaces for cosmolocal community co-creation, peer support, and egalitarian relationship building on Autistic terms, beyond the influence of the dominant culture of Homo Economicus®.

The Autistic inability to think hierarchically turns out to be the ability to think and live entirely relationally. We see this in the level of interest and growing participation in the human scale Ecologies of Care support model, and in the growing worldwide interest in the egalitarian NeurodiVenture worker coop model for engaging with the external social world.

In the hypernormative culture that dominates the modern world, it is hard to explain to non-Autistic people what the immersion in healthy Autistic culture feels like and what the development of healthy sacred lifetime relationships between Autistic people feels like. In mainstream society people don’t understand how Autistic people support each other, love each other, and care for each other in ways that go far beyond the culturally impaired neuronormative imagination.

NeurodiVerse : human scale cultures created by neurodiversity within the human species
(a) the universe of NeurodiVentures
(b) the set of all neurodivergent people

Our evolving web of relationships, mutual aid, and peer support initiatives is best understood in terms of emergent Ecologies of Care beyond the human.

There is the saying that “It takes a village to raise a child.” The Autistic Authentic Autonomous translation of this saying is “For an Autistic person it takes a human scale Autistic family to feel loved and alive.”

Most Autists are not born into healthy Autistic families. We have to co-create our families in our own space and time. In a healthy culture Autistic children are assisted in co-creating their unique Autistic families, but in our modern civilisation this cultural knowledge has been lost and is suppressed.

In many indigenous cultures children with unique qualities are recognised, given adult mentors with similarly unique qualities, and grow up to fulfill unique roles in their local community, connected to others with unique knowledge and insights, perhaps even in other communities.

If we are embedded in an ecology of care, we can thrive and share the pain and the joy of life.

Understanding a cultural organism as a set of relationships

In Autistic culture we understand a human scale cultural organism as a set of relationships, recognising that all humans have cognitive and emotional limits. We therefore intuitively know and deeply appreciate that small is beautiful. There is a human scale that is comprehensible, intimately integrated into Gaia.

Beyond this scale, we intuitively understand that cultural institutions amount to anthropocentric hubris, especially if such institutions are shaped by permanent hierarchical structures of social power. 

As humans we have the ability to appreciate the interdependencies and the beauty of the diversity of the unique and complementary relationships within every healthy cultural organism, including all the richness of interdependencies with other cultural organisms.

All healthy relationships contribute to the wellbeing of the cultural organism. There are no permanent social power differentials, and no particular relationship is more important than any other.

Furthermore, in a healthy cultural organism, there is a reasonable backup for any relationship that is potentially critical for group survival.

The self is a product of relationships. Anyone who has ever felt completely isolated knows this. Then the world shrinks to the relationship with oneself. But no one is completely isolated.

We are all part of Gaia, in relationship with Gaia.

Imprisonment in isolation, including isolation from Gaia, is an unimaginably cruel form of torture, a violation of a sacred human right. Social isolation in an urbanised environment is much worse than social isolation in a natural environment with access to plants and animals. In fact, being integrated into Gaia is a sacred right that applies to all living beings.

So-called “individual” wellbeing is a derivative of the health of all the human and non-human relationships a person is involved in. What really counts is relational health and communal health at human scale.

Understanding the modern social world

The modern social world we live in can only be understood from the margins, because the very notion of sense making has been confused. This is no surprise, because our capacity for sense making operates at human scale.

When a culture has destroyed the collective ability for deliberation at human scale, life is experienced as incoherent from the individual perspective, which is subconsciously attempting to generate coherence at human scale. When that process fails, nothing seems to make sense anymore.  “The Con : Fusion of Debord & Orwell” into which everyone alive today in the modern world was born, was succinctly articulated in 1986.

There is not much constructive to be learned from a growing cancerous mass that is destroying all cultures. All we can do is analyse the symptoms of the cancer, i.e. we can analyse and describe the dissonance between theory and practice of the institutions of our society. But this ability to recognise and describe cancer is far from being an ability to “cure” it. Below are three sources that describe different aspects of the cancer that are perpetuating paradigmatic cultural inertia.

The legal engineering behind the power of capital, explained by Matt Kennard.

The government machine that backs capital with raw violence explained by Jeffrey Sachs.

The cultural diseases that emerge if the limitations of human scale are not understood as the sacred bedrock of cultural organisms explained by George Tsakraklides.

George Tsakraklides does not make any mention of scale, but accurately describes what happens when anthropocentric hubris comes to dominate globally:

The idea that a small group of individuals can form a “government” that represents the best interests of its people, has been one of the biggest leaps of faith humanity ever took. Arguably, as our societies grew, we had no choice but to form these governments ••• The pooling of resources in practice often meant the accumulation of these resources within the hands of the few ••• Governments significantly expedited the exhaustion of resources, widened inequality to previously unimaginable levels, and alienated almost every citizen, who sooner or later felt the cold, heartless hand of indifference and discrimination from the very people who had been elected to “represent” them ••• It doesn’t take much effort to argue that government represents neither people, nor a privileged class of humans. It represents, defends, and protects the entity behind every single one of humanity’s decisions: money and wealth ••• Despite being an abstract, mechanistic, non-DNA based entity, money behaves very much like a life form: it too needs to secure its future existence, which it does by pursuing profit. Through the creation of money, humanity unintentionally gave rise to a new life-form which eventually parasitized it.  The role of government in this symbiosis has been, and remains, to be a puppet.  ••• Like any biological life form, they (governments) will do anything to survive.  It was a mistake to create institutions which attained so much power and autonomy that they eventually became super predators of society.  Both government and money behave as selfish life forms which need to survive and procreate. 

The popular perception that governments exist to “maintain order” is as false as the definition of order itself.  Order of what? For whose benefit? At what cost?  Order is open to multiple interpretations, rules and prohibitions which become vehicles for societal control.  Order is the favorite word of fascists •••The most dangerous aspect of all forms of government and power is that they despise change.  They want to keep everything the same: the same economy, the same players, the same mistakes.  This is how they ensure that their sponsors will not be unseated from positions of power.  The downside of this is that the most serious existential threats are only ever addressed at the level of pantomime theatrics •••If anything, governments are effectively Reality Management Authorities, servicing the need of the most powerful to maintain social narratives which control the production and distribution of wealth.  Governments are the visible manifestations of the psychonomy, enabling the most controlling, psychotic and unstable personalities to thrive and attain leadership positions ••• A successful leader today is more of an ideological chameleon than a mission-driven decision-maker.  Their most critical skill is masterfully dancing around the bullets of the psychonomy’s crossfire, pretending to be a peace maker ••• By managing people and agendas and keeping the wild jungles of the power ecosystem from closing in on them, politicians can secure their tenures as sitting representatives of the corporatocracy •••Stubbornly protecting their corporate bosses, governments simply hasten and amplify recurring convulsive episodes of economic and social seizure.  The wealthy elites have been consulted.  The PR agencies have been briefed.  And the casualties have already been selected, before the guns are fired •••Governments can easily be classified as existential threats.  Their dithering, inertia, inaction and procrastination create all of the horrifying conditions for small, once addressable issues to grow and one day become terminal, impassable predicaments.  Because of their inability to handle change even when it knocks on their door, RMAs are incapable of addressing the worst type of change: an existential threat.  In the face of a polycrisis, RMAs will typically avoid, deflect, distract and postpone, while at the same time weaponize the crisis for propaganda.  As looming threats grow, the government will spend all of its energy to do what it does best: reality management •••The priority of politics during an existential threat has always been to create, curate, and broadcast narratives which regurgitate the lies this civilisation desperately needs to keep calm and carry on living its fantasies.  When a collapse begins to register, it is already too late. This is because collapse is only the very last stage in a long process; a stage which, however, is irreversible: it can only be observed and endured.  As the crisis enters free-fall, the RMA goes quiet: leaders literally disappear, retreating into their pre-built bunkers and golden parachutes. Social services vanish, silence falls across the political spectrum, and the public is abandoned.  The government who we all thought would come to our rescue, was indeed merely a glorified PR machine ••• Following so many failed COP meetings attended by all these RMAs, it would be delusional to nurture even the slightest bit of hope in any government to solve the existential threat of the climate crisis and civilisational overshoot •••From the much larger Gaia perspective, authority and power are meaningless human constructs. The only authority and power on this planet belong to nature, and physics.

I agree with the conclusion. To sum up WEIRD paradigmatic inertia in one sentence, I frame the “iron law of social design” as follows: 

The universal iron law of social design: everything is allowed to change – as long as the established structure of social power is maintained or strengthened.

I have witnessed this dystopian hypernormative law play out in many corporations and large government departments.

Where to from here?

Humans are part of nature. We have evolved to operate, survive, and thrive as cultural organisms at human scale, especially in challenging / marginal environments. We still have this capacity, but it has been eclipsed by a global cultural cancer. So, when cultural reforms are futile, what options do we have for re-booting healthy cultural organisms?

The cancer can not be reformed, but there are many little sprouts of new human scale ways of being emerging in the cultural compost heap. The dying process of a cultural cancer is the unavoidable metamorphosis we are undergoing. 

Some of the inmates of dying institutions may consciously choose to jointly exit, and metamorphise into a life affirming organism, or they may eventually be forced to leave involuntarily by the social circumstances. In the former scenario the emerging human scale organism may, amongst other things, offer palliative care for the dying institution from the outside – i.e. assistance with exit path for the remaining inmates, alongside the provision of new life regenerating gifts as part of Gaia. This is a kind of life affirming logic that is not accessible via the dystopian logic of Homo Economicus. 

Biologists who have not read broadly enough about our cultural evolutionary past, i.e. biological and cultural anthropology, tend to extrapolate from other primates, and arrive at the confusion of humans with Homo Economicus, ending up discounting human imagination and the innate collaborative tendencies that distinguish us from other primates.

The most compelling biological metaphor I have found to date to gain a sense of what might play out in the realm of culture is the metamorphosis of a developing insect. Life is fractal. 

Metamorphosis is one of the most profound restructurings of a biological organism. As humans we are far too limited in our abilities to foresee exactly how such a pattern maps and is already playing out in terms of human cultural organisms.

However, transposing the steps of metamorphosis onto modern human cultures suggests a path that includes: 

  1. A non-growing developmental stage for human scale groups to seek a safe space, and as needed construct a protective physical/cultural shelter for the group.
  2. Internal collaborative niche construction to develop new internal functional structures and external functions that are adaptive to the anticipated cosmolocal ecological conditions going forward.
  3. Cultural reproduction. The final stage would be the adult, or ‘imago’ form of a human scale group, where new external and internal functions are fully operational, and able to feed the group, including reproduction of the group culture. This would not need to involve physical reproduction, but rather knowledge and skills transfer to other cosmolocally related human scale group, and especially groups within the same bioregion experiencing comparable ecological conditions.

As established super-human scale institutions decay and become unreliable, not dissimilar to what is the case in many so-called “less developed” countries, individuals and small groups will inevitably stop entrusting their entire livelihoods and lives to such institutions, and gravitate towards some expression of the rough pattern outlined above. 

Of course we have no way of predicting when and where such developments will emerge. What we can do is to offer education to prepare communities for this possibility in a life affirming way, reiterating what Joseph Tainter observed in his seminal work in 1988. For the majority of an oppressed and impoverished population so-called “collapse” of dysfunctional and resource intensive institutions can be a liberating experience. This of course assumes that communities are educated and equipped with locally adapted subsistence level life skills.

This presents WEIRD countries with an overdue opportunity for radically new forms of cosmolocal collaboration with communities in the Global South. As part of the global metacrisis that Gaia is facing, the populations in WEIRD countries will increasingly experience a need for education in subsistence level life skills – a kind of proactive “development” assistance in reverse, and a re-balancing of the extreme levels of global and in-country social inequities and injustices that dominate the entire modern world.

Metamorphosis back to human scale can be imagined as a cultural development stage for global intersectional and neurodivergent solidarity beyond the human, undoing some of the harm perpetuated in throughout the colonial and neocolonial era, at least for the generations alive today.

Human cultural adaptivity

Our best bet is to relearn and remember everything we can muster about the cultural adaptivity that is at our disposal at human scale. 

This requires the kind of deep and profound shift in trust from established institutions towards mutual aid and the community co-creation at human scale that indigenous Mexican scholar Yuria Celidwen talks about: 

We need commitment, we need community. We need to create spaces of trust. But for that, there’s tremendous work that we need to be doing. But I don’t think that any of that work will be possible, should we not have that commitment–that commitment that no matter how challenging and tremendously difficult it will be to reckon with these narratives and to dismantle these narratives. Because seeing the horror in the eye of all these narratives that we live by comes with tremendous understanding. It will leave us very fragile, very vulnerable, and most, of course, are not willing to do that, because we don’t feel safe. But if we are able to stand the heat and create these spaces, if we commit to do this kind of work for the benefit of the planet, then we may be able to learn that we can fly.

This shift in trust is already happening outside established institutions. It can only happen via self-selected and self-organising groups. I sense this is what we are already starting to experience on the intersectional margins of modern societies.

As part of co-creating health cultural organisms we are uncovering and documenting knowledge that is useful for human scale groups, engaging in omnidirectional learning between emerging theories and cosmolocal practices, learning by doing, and heading into an uncertain but much more life-affirming collective future at human scale, sharing all our joys and pains of life in ways that have been systematically denied by the life destroying logic of Homo Economicus.

The following clip from an Adam Curtis’ interview has aged well.

Certainties we can count on:

  1. Humans have cognitive and emotional limits. Implications: Small is beautiful. There is a human scale that is comprehensible, intimately integrated into Gaia. Beyond this scale, cultural institutions amount to anthropocentric hubris. 
  2. The last human won’t be a capitalist.
  3. This list is evolving, contribute your observations at the next NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity!

There is no recipe book. There are only timeless life affirming human scale values and our innate capacity for relational thinking.

Onwards!

The living planet as a sacred relational ecology of care that weaves together all living beings

Slowing down to reflect and relate deeply with the non-human beings that are part of the living planet is an important aspect of life and healing, especially in a social context of prescribed hypernormative busyness.

Slowing down

Disengaging from hypernormative busyness helps us to slow down and clearly distinguish the foundations of flourishing life from anthropocentric hubris:

  1. Understanding the living planet as a dynamic system of ecologies of care beyond human that evolves via a process of collaborative niche construction.
  2. Understanding the life destroying and life denying mono-cult of anthropocentrism / technocentrism, illustrated by the cult of AI

On the basis of the evidence available to us today, we are well advised to fully acknowledge human limitations, including the limitations of human science and technologies conceived by humans. This entails adopting a scale-aware precautionary principle in all human endeavors.

Scale-aware precautionary principle

At small (human) scales, practicing a high level of autonomous communal self-governance, and applying a political conception of the precautionary principle: ‘Communal decision making in Open Space, supported by an advice process and mutual trust, should incorporate a margin of safety; activities should be limited below the level at which no adverse effect has been observed or predicted (margin of safety)’.

At large (super-human) scales, respecting the sanctity of the living planet, and applying a strict, science based conception of the precautionary principle: ‘Activities that present an uncertain potential for significant harm should be prohibited unless the proponent of the activity shows that it presents no appreciable risk of harm (prohibitory)’

Together, the two parts of the scale-aware precautionary principle imply that no community, regardless of scale, is entitled to conduct an activity that presents an uncertain potential for significant harm beyond small (human) scales.

The scale-aware overarching precautionary principle tells us that social governance should never be placed in the hands of any person or institution with super-human scale decision making abilities.

The principle based and scale-aware social justice approach to collaboration between groups that is at the core of framing evolutionary processes in terms of collaborative niche construction has been distilled from a range of sciences and transdisciplinary practices, including the intersectionality between the neurodiversity, disability, and indigenous rights movements.

Now people are listening because their own picture of their own future is threatened. So it’s a bit ironic to reach out to Native people now to save their butts.

Indigenous wisdom that is really needed: How have we survived a 95 to 98% population reduction in a really short period of time. They eliminated, through massacre, starvation, disease from starvation, ninety percent of the population of California Indians between 1848 and about 1875. So we’re talking about one generation. One generation. So how have California Indians managed to survive that degree of Destruction?

To really study the genocide, to study what happens here, is the process of coming to a point of humility.

As long as they are not willing to deal with the human cost, and the cost in all of life that they’ve created with that attitude, taking that same predatory attitude and saying, well now I want indigenous wisdom – it’s really offensive, and it’s not going to work. It will not work.

– Stan Rushworth, from Prayer for the Earth: An Indigenous Response to These Times

Techno-optimism

All empires eventually die, with a perfect track record to date, consistent with everything we know about living organisms. All super-human scale cultural organisms that tolerate dehumanisation and permanent social power gradients between people are based on origin myths that justify such social power differentials.

In the 21st century we live in a multi-polar world dominated by three empires: Westernised countries, China, and Russia. Depending on what metric is used, either the first or the second of these empires is the largest or the “most powerful”. The selection of preferred metric in itself is a reflection of cultural bias – there is no objectively “correct” way to measure the scale of an empire.

Discussions of the risks of living in a multi-polar world are a distraction from a much more important question: Why do we still live in powered-up empires in a world that considers itself technologically “advanced” or “developed”? Asking this question focuses our attention on the role of technologies – of all kinds, in perpetuating and amplifying social power gradients, and on the role of techno-optimists in cult-ivating and perpetuating a myth of technological progress.

In the Anglosphere and in China, the notion of technological “progress” is increasingly entangled with growing levels of investments in digital technologies, especially so-called artificially intelligent digital systems. Anyone who understands the deeper foundations of these technologies knows that they are abstract tools for performing arithmetic calculations. Today’s digital technologies can be understood as the digital descendants of pocket calculators, spreadsheets, and accounting systems. Like a hammer and any other tool, each category of digital tool has certain use cases – and ignoring the limits of these use cases, especially at scale, easily results in significant harm.

The last three decades of fossil fuelled energy and resource extraction, exponentially accelerating investments in the Internet, the abstract logic of interest bearing debt, and the invisible hand (mergers and acquisitions), have led to a digital mono-culture and to a dangerous extension of the delusion of infinite growth on a finite planet, which has dragged humans and most non-human beings deep into the sixth mass extinction of the living planet.

We can only help the living planet heal from anthropocentric cultural diseases, i.e. from the three political empires mentioned above, plus a slightly larger number of digital technological empires, if we probe the origin myths of these cultural diseases.

The assumptions that are used to legitimise the highly unequal distributions of social powers and resources often remain unspoken, and those that are acknowledged amount to dogmatic religious beliefs about the living planet and the cosmos, re-framed either as common-sense or as scientific “facts” about human natures and evolutionary processes for which the evidence is entangled in a circular argument with the “natural” allocation of social powers in one or more technological or political empires. This results in worldviews in which the rise and existence of powered-up empires is an irreversible inevitability.

The rise of powered-up empires as an irreversible inevitability is the manifestation of the infinite linear arrow of progress that powers all modern political and technological empires.

I am less familiar with the specific assumptions that frame the current arrow of progress in China and Russia, but evidence for the misguided myths about human natures and evolutionary processes that frame the arrow of progress in US technological empires is not hard to find.

Current techno-optimism in the US and the Anglosphere is a result of willful blindness, including a complete absence of a nuanced scale-ware precautionary principle, and the elevation of neoliberal ideology to the status of a state religion. The propensity for carelessness and the associated sense of cultural superiority was clearly demonstrated to the world during the era of nuclear bomb tests in the Pacific, and is currently visible in the delusional beliefs that underpin US technological empires.

Digging deeper, the roots of current Western techno-optimism can be linked to a cultural shift in the science of physics and engineering disciplines following WWII, in particular to the Copenhagen interpretation about the measurement problem and the meaning of quantum mechanics. Adam Becker has written an entire book about this cultural shift to correct common misconceptions about quantum mechanics. He sums up the overall cultural effect on the way physics and engineering is practiced in the US as:

“Shut up and calculate!”

This attitude to technology design has become accepted practice in the domain of software and data intensive systems. Laws and social norms in industrialised societies are shaped by the metaphor of society as a factory and the metaphor of people as machines more than most people realise. In the digital technoverse, biological life is perceived as becoming irrelevant. The mastery of controlling complex fossil fuel powered machines led to a sense of technocultural superiority in the colonial era, and amplified the desire to control human beings.

The reliance on formal symbolic representations and automated computations, especially since the discovery of data as “the new oil” in wake of the invention of the Internet, has led to a thin veneer of scientific rigor (“data science”), and an obsession with inventing abstract metrics and contrived categories within the digital realm, reflecting the cultural beliefs of techno-optimistic designers working in service of neoliberal capitalists, rather than a deep appreciation for the ecological diversity of the living planet, and a basic understanding of human cultural organisms as being integral parts and active participants within ecologies of care beyond the human.

The casual attitude to the limits of understanding at the heart of physics not only paved the path for the modern cult of techo-optimism, it also resulted in a cultural bias in which the precautionary principle has become irrelevant, especially when critical analysis might expose foundational ideological assumptions as unjustifiable or entirely delusional.

Adam Becker, who is an astrophysicist and science writer, is currently writing a new book on precisely this topic. A few days ago he gave an invited talk on the topic at the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico, amongst other things pointing out the absurdity of infinite exponential human technological expansion into space – simply reminding the audience that within a few centuries the whole endeavor would come to a grinding halt due to the limits of available energy in the galaxy and universe.

Less than 24 hours after making this talk available online, the public link to the recording was deleted. This prompted me to take a closer look at the SFI website. Now I understand why this author / book / recording does not sit comfortably with the establishment at SFI. It was sad to see the level of anthropocentric hubris regurgitated by David Krakauer in the introductory video for this absurd research programme – take a look, you cannot make this up!

Changing the world one planet at a time …To search through outer space we shall need to rise above our inner spaces, the gravest challenges of our time — from reducing disease and economic inequality, to managing finite resources and surviving war — and to take all necessary steps towards a larger, shared goal: an understanding of life’s place in the universe. Because confronting the challenges of space requires braving and solving the complexities of life…

“…  The Miller Omega Program is run according to a set of values considered by the donor, Bill Miller, in discussion with the SFI President, David Krakauer, to ensure the most effective execution of the program in relation to the SFI core mission and donor intent.” 

On Bill Miller‘s background:

During his tenure as sole manager of the Legg Mason Value Trust†, its performance exceeded the S&P 500 index for a record 15 consecutive years. He was named Fund Manager of the Year in 1998 by Morningstar‡, The Greatest Money Manager of the 1990s by Money Magazine, Fund Manager of the Decade by Morningstar.com, and was named by Barron’s to its All-Century Investment Team. He received the Sauren Golden Award in 2015 and 2017 for Best US Equity Manager, and Two Gold Medals in 2019, 2020, and 2021 for Excellent Fund Management.

Bill earned his economics degree from Washington and Lee University where he graduated with honors in 1972. Subsequent to graduation, he served as a military intelligence officer overseas and then pursued graduate studies in philosophy in the PhD program at The Johns Hopkins University, where he currently sits on the Board of Trustees. He received his CFA designation in 1986. Mr. Miller is Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees of the Santa Fe Institute where he served as chairman from 2005 to 2009. The Santa Fe Institute is one of the world’s leading scientific research laboratories, conducting multidisciplinary research in complex systems theory. A long-time supporter of the Santa Fe Institute, Bill established the Miller Omega Fund in 2016.

This tells us everything we need to know about cultural bias at the Santa Fe Institute. Sadly, the Santa Fe Institute is one of many research institutes and universities that have become heavily dependent on donations from individuals and institutions that amplify the the misguided beliefs of techno-optimistic cults.

Naomi Klein sums up her thoughts on the cult of AI as follows:

Is all of this overly dramatic? A stuffy and reflexive resistance to exciting innovation? Why expect the worse? Altman reassures us: “Nobody wants to destroy the world.” Perhaps not. But as the ever-worsening climate and extinction crises show us every day, plenty of powerful people and institutions seem to be just fine knowing that they are helping to destroy the stability of the world’s life-support systems, so long as they can keep making record profits that they believe will protect them and their families from the worst effects. Altman, like many creatures of Silicon Valley, is himself a prepper: back in 2016, he boasted: “I have guns, gold, potassium iodide, antibiotics, batteries, water, gas masks from the Israeli Defense Force and a big patch of land in Big Sur I can fly to.”

I’m pretty sure those facts say a lot more about what Altman actually believes about the future he is helping unleash than whatever flowery hallucinations he is choosing to share in press interviews.

Behaviourism

Techno-optimism is a direct extension of the fiction of homo economicus, which can be traced back to the earliest days of fossil fuel powered industrialisation. The latter manifests itself in the beliefs associated with the language of behaviourism, which exists in multiple dialects, and which has come to permeate and pollute many disciplines in the social sciences.

In our work we’ve tried to test some of the basic predictions made by the Homo economics model using some simple tools from behavioral economics applied across a diverse swath of human societies. Not only do we find that the Homo economicus predictions fail in every society (24 societies, multiple communities per society), but instructively, we find that it fails in different ways in different societies. Nevertheless, after our paper “In search of Homo economicus” in 2001 in the American Economic Review, we continued to search for him. Eventually, we did find him. He turned out to be a chimpanzee. The canonical predictions of the Homo economicus model have proved remarkably successful in predicting chimpanzee behavior in simple experiments. So, all theoretical work was not wasted, it was just applied to the wrong species.

– Joseph Henrich, What Economists Haven’t Found: Humans

The focus on economic performance and the subordination of all other dimensions of life in industrialised societies normalise coercive psychological and physical interventions. This has profoundly traumatising effects.

Practices such as Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) to force compliance with arbitrary, externally imposed demands are pseudoscientific practices of trying to change an individual’s behaviour to conform to the social expectations of a particular culture. Various jurisdictions around the world have passed laws against LGTBQIA+ conversion therapy. However, the same underlying techniques of coercion continue to be applied to young Autistic children and other vulnerable people.

By framing the trauma responses to routine use of coercive techniques in terms of addictions, we can begin to comprehend the magnitude of the wound that modernity has inflicted on the living planet.

The delusion of the self at the core of homo economicus is feeding the addiction to various forms of social power – this “normalises” carelessness and deceptive forms of communication, and it allows the latent capacity for establishing dominance hierarchies to override our innate human collaborative tendencies towards mutual aid.

The delusion of technological progress at the core of techno-optimism is feeding the addiction to various forms of convenience and consumption – this keeps us perpetually busy and it distracts us from our human natures.

In the human social sphere the abstraction of techno-optimistic homo economicus is causing untold harm in the form of [religious] economic wars, which are increasingly waged and executed by digital algorithms with minimal human intervention.

The neoliberal invisible hand has become a self-fulfilling religious prophecy. This prophecy and this actively life destroying religion is a death sentence for the human species, but only if we continue to worship this toxic religion, refuse to confront our trauma responses, and deny our deeply collaborative and relational human natures, as well as our cognitive and emotional limits, and our embodied spiritual dimension, which is completely absent in the digital realm.

The art of living well in the cultural compost heap

We are already well into the sixth mass extinction. The civilisation of modern empires is in an advanced stage of dying.

The full implications still need to sink in. This will only be possible by framing the associated social dynamics in terms of cults and addictions, i.e. understanding the history of all empires in terms of a history of cults, understanding social power hierarchies in terms of addictions, and extending compassion to the inmates. The header image for this article was inspired by the following illustration:

The shift in linguistic frame allows us to conceptualise and work with the cultural compost heap, which nurtures intersectional solidarity on the margins of the mono-cult, and which gives birth to an embodied planetary spirituality that understands the living planet as a sacred relational ecology of care, weaving together all living beings, shifting our attention towards:

  1. Relearning how to catalyse relationships of mutual trust and understanding beyond the human – a domain in which we can learn a lot from the wisdom of indigenous societies.
  2. Nurturing ecologies of care, sowing the seeds of love – the art of living well.

There is no shortage of small human scale initiatives that re-conceptualise human societies in comprehensible, compassionate, and life affirming ways – the opposite of Shut up and calculate!”

The world in reality is a beautifully interconnected world, and it’s interconnected through many many layers. It’s interconnected through consciousness, which is why we are spiritual beings in human form. But the plants outside my window are spiritual beings in plant form. But the plant of the lychee is in lychee form, and the tree of the mango is in mango form. They are just different expressions of one spiritual interconnected consciousness in the world.

I’ve studied quantum theory. We realised that the particles in the world are really not the basic reality. The basic reality is potential and energy, and it’s only when you try and measure it, then it shows up as a particle, or it shows up as a wave, but the reality really is that which connects, the non-separability problem. My PhD thesis was on non-separation, non-locality, and quantum theory. We knew [this] 100 years ago in physics, and yet an obsolete physics of more than 100 years ago is being used to shape and and divide a very interconnected world. So dualism today is not just epistemologically so wrong, it is not just ontologically so wrong, it is spiritually just not the right way to think of the world, but it is now becoming a threat to human life, preventing people from living with each other in diversity with love. And that’s why we have to spread the message of non-dualism, of interconnectedness, of oneness through love, and we have to be the practice...

All cultures had economies but it wasn’t the first organising principle, it was a byproduct of good living… Where did that wealth come from? It was an economy, but it was not an economy of extraction. It was not an economy of domination, it was an economy of living. If you go to the roots of the word economy, economy according to Aristotle is the art of living. Our civilisation has very deep spiritual foundations, and through spirituality you know that the diversity in the world is really different expressions of the same oneness… Let all the beings flourish

– Vandana Shiva

Collectively we can tap into a wealth of knowledge and timeless indigenous wisdom.

Join us!

References

Alkhatib A. 2021. ‘To Live in Their Utopia: Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes. Why Algorithmic Systems Create Absurd Outcomes.’ CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), May 8–13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.

Angarova, G. 2023. ‘Understanding Suffering and Knowing Our Place.’ Holding the Fire: Episode 4. Resilience.org.

Becker, A. 2018. What Is Real?: The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics. Basic Books.

Bettin, J. 2021. The Beauty of Collaboration at Human Scale: Timeless patterns of human limitations. S23M.

Bowles, S. 2016. The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are no Substitute for Good Citizens. Yale University Press.

Brannen, P. 2018. The Ends of the World: Volcanic Apocalypses, Lethal Oceans, and Our Quest to Understand Earth’s Past Mass Extinctions. Harper Collins Publishers.

Design Justice Network. 2018. ‘Design Justice Network Principles.’ https://designjustice.org/read-the-principles.

Fischer, M. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Zero Books.

Klein, N. May 2023. AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/08/ai-machines-hallucinating-naomi-klein.

Kohn, A. 1993. Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes. Houghton Mifflin.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1981. Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press.

Meadows, D. 1972. The Limits to growth; a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. A Potomac Associates book.

Metzler, H. et al. 2023. ‘Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media.’ Perspectives on Psychological Science OnlineFirst. July 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231185057.

Nelson, T. 1999. ‘Ted Nelson’s Computer Paradigm, Expressed as One-Liners.’ Xanadu. https://xanadu.com.au/ted/TN/WRITINGS/TCOMPARADIGM/tedCompOneLiners.html.

Roman, J. 2023. Eat, Poop, Die: How Animals Make Our World. Little, Brown Spark.

Rushworth, S. 2024. ‘Prayer for the Earth: An Indigenous Response to These Times.’ The Poetry of Predicament. March 2024. https://youtu.be/anVEGa43xvM .

Shiva, V. & Shiva, K. 2020. Oneness vs. the 1%: Shattering Illusions, Seeding Freedom. Chelsea Green Publishing.

Spicer, A. 2020. ‘Playing the Bullshit Game: How Empty and Misleading Communication Takes Over Organizations.’ Organization Theory, Volume 1: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720929704.

Tainter, J. A. 1988. Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press.

Walker, N. 2014. Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms & Definitions. Neuroqueer. https://neuroqueer.com/neurodiversity-terms-and-definitions/.

Wilson, D.S. & Henrich J. 2016. Scientists Discover What Economists Haven’t Found: Humans. Evonomics. https://evonomics.com/scientists-discover-what-economists-never-found-humans/.

Falling in love with human limitations – healing from anthropocentrism

Humans are not going to find solutions for the polycrisis, conquer new planets, the galaxy, and the universe, fully understand the human condition, let alone the living planet or the cosmos, or develop technologies that replace anthropocentrism with technocentrism – in fact these two terms are synonyms for one and the same human collective grandiose delusion.

The presence of the above limitations opens up human potential that far exceeds what any individual can imagine. Human potential starts to manifest once we fully appreciate:

  1. Human cognitive and emotional limitations (*)
  2. Human and non-human diversity (*)
  3. Interdependence and mutual aid (*)
  4. The big cycle of life, including our impermanence and the compostability of all living beings (*)
  5. The wonder of life, the sacredness of all living beings
  6. Collaborative niche construction at human comprehensible scales
  7. Compassion – seeing the humanity in all mistakes, misunderstandings, and addictions
  8. De-powered dialogue to compare notes and incrementally develop shared understanding
  9. Deliberation in Open Space for omni-directional learning
  10. The sacredness of lifetime relationships beyond the human

Cultures that appreciate these ten aspects of life are co-creating conditions conducive to life – they are conducive to human and non-human wellbeing. Cultures that negate one or more of these aspects of life are are not conducive to human and non-human wellbeing.

(*) These four aspects of life are biological facts.

Deep appreciation of each one of these ten aspects of being alive reminds us of the suffering caused by all forms of social power dynamics and the need to clamp down on all any attempts to establish permanent social power structures.

Becoming conscious of and genuinely appreciating human cognitive and emotional limitations is the foundational step that allows us not only to appreciate all the other aspects of being alive, but it also highlights the absurdity and the harm caused by all attempts to establish and maintain institutions that attempt to “control” life beyond human comprehensible scales.

A couple of days ago archaeologist David Wengrow published a timely article on how our picture of past populations and the scope of human freedoms has been distorted through the lens of kingdoms and empires:

… How many, back then, preferred imperial control to non-imperial freedoms? How many were given a choice? How much choice do we have now? It seems nobody really knows the answers to these questions, at least not yet. In future, it will take more than zombie statistics to stop us from asking them. There are forgotten histories buried in the ground, of human politics and values. The soil mantle of Earth, including the very soil itself, turns out to be not just our species’ life support system, but also a forensic archive, containing precious evidence to challenge timeworn narratives about the origins of inequality, private property, patriarchy, warfare, urban life and the state – narratives born directly from the experience of empire, written by the ‘winners’ of a future that may yet make losers of us all.

Investigating the human past in this way is not a matter of searching for utopia, but of freeing us to think about the true possibilities of human existence. Unhampered by outdated theoretical assumptions and dogmatic interpretations of obsolete data, could we look with fresh eyes at the very meaning of terms like ‘civilisation’? Our species has existed for something like 300,000 years. Today, we stand on a precipice, confronting a future defined by environmental collapse, the erosion of democracy, and wars of unprecedented destructiveness: a new age of empire, perhaps the last in a cycle of such ages that, for all we really know, may represent only a modest fraction of the human experience.

For those who seek to change course, such uncertainty about the scope of human freedoms may itself be a source of liberation, opening pathways to other futures.

Fully appreciating human diversity

When we are conscious of human cognitive and emotional limits, we can start to appreciate human and non-human diversity, interdependence, mutual aid, and the compostability of all living beings.

Life (re)creates conditions conducive to life. Humans evolved to collaborate in groups that don’t exceed human comprehensibility.

The latent capacity for forming groups beyond the scale of human comprehensibility is best understood by adopting a non-anthropocentric ecological lens, and enumerating a few obvious consequences. In groups beyond human scale:

  • No one can claim to understand the unique lived experiences, limitations, and needs that are associated with all the relationships within the group
  • Anyone who makes decisions that have the potential to affect others in major ways is likely causing suffering without being aware of it – setting the stage for ableism to become established
  • Interactions between people who don’t know much if anything about each other become normalised
  • Maintaining social norms that clamp down on all emergent social power structures becomes difficult – if such social norms are maintained over long stretches of time it is the result of an evolutionary process beyond human control, for example thanks to favourable ecological conditions and feedback loops, and not thanks to “super human abilities” of an elite of “leaders”
  • Once social power structures becomes established, the group increasingly suffers from the instability and energy cost of in-group competition, and as a result compromises its ability to fully pay attention to ecological conditions and feedback loops beyond the human
  • Within a frame of social competition, any disinterest or inability to participate in competitive social games is viewed as a weakness and a sign of inferiority

In contrast, in human scale cultural organisms:

  • Everyone has some awareness of the unique lived experiences, limitations, and needs that are present within the group
  • Anyone who makes decisions that cause others to suffer in major ways will be made aware of it – reducing the risk of ableism becoming established
  • People who interact know each other, and have some level of shared understanding and mutual trust
  • Maintaining social norms that clamp down on all emergent social power structures is a viable collective practice, and the benefits of investing in the effort are obvious to everyone
  • In a group in which radically egalitarian practices are well established and de-powered relationships have been maintained over many years, individual attempts at establishing social power are quickly recognised and confirmed from multiple perspectives, and can be dealt with effectively
  • Within an egalitarian frame of collaborative niche construction, all dimensions of diversity become potential sources of unique capabilities, strengthening compassion and commitments to mutual care – and active disinterest in competitive social games reinforces the frame

The lived experience of ability and disability is entirely a matter of social context and framing.

Diversity and disability in modern industrialised societies

Sadly in hypernormative societies experiences with radically egalitarian human scale organisms have become very rare. Experience in the practice of de-powered dialogue has also become rare, even within households and families.

David Wengrow’s observations on the distorting lenses of kingdoms and empires fit beautifully with the introduction to the Ecologies of Care peer support model:

As we live through the current human predicament we are well advised to understand capitalism as a collective learning disability that actively contributes to human and non-human suffering…

The neurodiversity, disability, and indigenous rights movements are part of the cultural immune system of human societies, responding to the mechanistic, hypercompetitive, and rule based approach to social arrangements imposed by the learning disabled mono-cult with a holistic social justice approach. The key element that holds together all the threads, which has been systematically eroded in Westernised societies is the notion of trust, including the role of trustworthy, sacred relationships within the context of life affirming ecologies of care…

When the existence/emergence of social power dynamics is fully normalised, human social interactions are no longer about deepening shared understanding and relational ecologies of care, but about winning and losing competitive social games and systematically marginalising the less fortunate.

Diversity and disability in earlier times

Based on what we can glean from earlier times, the cultural bias inherent in the modern myths of social progress via industrialisation and the religion of the invisible hand is exposed.

Archaeologist Lorna Tilley and her colleagues, who specialize in the way past societies cared for people who were sick or disabled, remind us of the cooperation, flexibility, and ingenuity shown by past peoples in caring for one another.

Many papers challenge (sometimes overturn) assumptions about aspects of health, disease and care practices and/or social attitudes in relation to disability in medieval times (e.g., B ́ed ́ecarrats et al., 2021; Miclon et al., 2021; Robb et al., 2021; Tilley and Cave, 2023), demonstrating that a bio- archaeological lens can offer new perspectives on a past we believe is ‘known’. Finally, a number of the case studies highlight the importance of (re)considering medieval attitudes towards those experiencing disability, with findings indicating a lack of stigmatisation and an acceptance of difference which support the observations of some medieval historians (e.g., Metzler, 2006; Cilione and Gazzaniga, 2023) and add a touch of humanity to our understanding of life in this era (e.g., Bethard et al., 2021; Kozakaite ̇ et al., 2022b; McKenzie et al., 2022; Tilley and Cave, 2023).

– From Disability and care in Western Europe during Medieval times: A bioarchaeological perspective

Neanderthal healthcare is significant not in its distinctiveness compared to that of biologically modern humans in later periods but in its similarity. Neanderthals appear to share a common human emotional and practical response to vulnerability and suffering of those that they were close to, attitudes also reflected in care of children, attitudes to the body at death through mortuary practice. The very similarity of Neanderthal healthcare to that of later periods has important implications however – that organized, knowledgeable and caring healthcare is not unique to our species but rather has a long evolutionary history. Healthcare provisioning is likely to have been significant in reducing mortality and ameliorating risks in resource acquisition far into the distant past.

– From Calculated or caring? Neanderthal healthcare in social context

So what can the bioarchaeology of care approach tell us? In the cases of both Man Bac Burial 9 and Lesley, provision of health-related care entailed intensive and time-consuming efforts on the part of caregivers. In both cases, those providing care in response to acute distress would more than likely have anticipated that, were initial health care measures successful, some level of long-term support for the recipient might be needed. Conscious choices were required: To give or to withhold care? To assign scarce resources to caring for one individual or to assign priority elsewhere? In both instances, group members chose to allocate their time and energies to caring for the vulnerable in their community.

Our past contains important lessons for the present. if we are willing to pay attention. As we write this article, uncertainty reigns over the fate of the millions who will lose health care coverage if the Affordable Care Act is repealed. Is this really the best ‘art of the deal” that we can manage? An archaeological focus on health-related care completely overturns the notion that society has evolved by embracing a winner-takes-all “survival of the fittest” approach to health and welfare policy. On the contrary, research demonstrates the cooperation, flexibility, and ingenuity shown by past peoples in caring for one another. The bioarchaeology of care approach highlights a defining hallmark of the human species: our capacity to support each other in times of need.

– From Caring in Ancient Times

In early Neolithic Vietnam, a young man survived from early adolescence into adulthood completely paralysed from the waist down and with very limited use of his upper body.  Dependent on others for meeting his most basic needs, Burial 9’s survival was only possible because of the high quality, dedicated and time-consuming care he received.  

The skeletal remains of Man Bac Burial 9, shown in Figure 1 below, provide evidence of a pathological condition difficult to manage successfully in a modern medical environment.  Four thousand years ago, the challenges to health maintenance and quality of life would have been overwhelming.

Looking after those who are unable to look after themselves is a behaviour that defines what it is to be human.  Evidence suggests health-related care has been practiced within the human family at least the last 100,000 years, and some biologists claim that conspecific caregiving was essential to human evolution.  

– From Introduction to the Bioarchaeology of Care

Deconstructing ableist views of the past, however, is a work in progress, powerfully explored by Vogel (Citation2023) in this volume in a careful consideration of studies of bodily differences and disabilities in the fields of Egyptology and Egyptian archaeology. The author interrogates the variable nature of how disability has been, and can be, understood in this field, revealing the early tendencies for cataloguing and identifying disease in medicalised terms with embedded assumptions that these defined physiological and bodily differences. Discussions of disability in terms of treatment, care and therapy are recent developments. Southwell, Gowland, and Powell (Citation2016) in particular highlight the universal importance of care in past human relationships, dispelling simplistic notions of othering and discrimination and underlining the complexity of responses – positive and negative – to disease and impairment in the past.

Vogel, in relation to Egyptian studies, calls for a rejection of a dehumanising medicalised language, and a new focus on rethinking the disability paradigm, with consideration of the cultural variability in perceptions and the agency of those with disabilities and bodily differences. In doing so, we can move away from ableist interpretations but also empower the voices of those who directly experienced impairment, disease and bodily difference in the past. In different ways, the case studies from contemporary archaeology presented in this volume by Hattori (Citation2023) and Dezhamkhooy (Citation2023), also use archaeology to document the lives and deaths of individuals denied permanence, safety and an identity in the modern world. For example, Hattori’s archaeological and forensic exploration uncovers evidence of the structural erasure of the identity of the disenfranchised poor in Brazil through the state sponsorship of mass cremations. The study poses powerful questions about individual rights to care at death, commemoration and remembrance (Hattori Citation2023).

– From Materialising inequalities in past, present and future

An archaeological focus on health-related care completely overturns the notion that society has evolved by embracing a winner-takes-all “survival of the fittest” approach to health and welfare policy. On the contrary, research demonstrates the cooperation, flexibility, and ingenuity shown by past peoples in caring for one another. The bioarchaeology of care approach highlights a defining hallmark of the human species: our capacity to support each other in times of need.

Palliative care for institutions of empire & exit paths for the inmates

Once we acknowledge the magnitude of the current predicament of humanity, our focus shifts away from wasting precious time on delusional and life destroying notions of technological progress, towards minimising human and non-human suffering as part of the big cycle of life that is far beyond human control.

Minimising human suffering translates to providing palliative care for the institutions of empire and proving safe exit paths for the inmates. Minimising suffering beyond the human translates to nurturing ecologies of care beyond the human, and to falling in love with human limitations.

The emerging results of our ongoing survey on cognitive dissonance speak loud and clear.

Demographics:

Note: we have yet to circulate the survey to a wider audience that extends beyond the intersectionally marginalised Neurodivergent, Autistic, LGBTQIA+, and Disabled communities.

Quantitative results:

20% could not [bring themselves to] write a job application for a corporation or big government department – this matches my own experience, and it would make over 30% feel really bad. Less than 10% would feel somewhat good about.

Only 20% would feel somewhat good about the prospect of accepting employment based on the standard corporate employment contract of an employer. 30% could not do it or would feel really bad. It is not a viable option – I know that it was not a survivable option for me.

Many of us could not [bring ourselves to] market and sell services and products to a corporation or big government department, and most would feel bad about it.

In contrast, most of us love helping friends who are in need.

But then our competitive hypernormative society has taught us to feel bad about asking for help.

When in employed work, we are routinely pushed towards and beyond our ethical concerns and emotional limits.

We know that we can’t expect much if any tangible assistance from employers. The modern conception of employment is a very one-sided exploitative relationship. Comparable relationships within our families would be characterised as neglect and abuse.

Most of us love helping strangers if we are in a position to do so.

And yet, as with our friends, our competitive hypernormative society has taught us to feel bad about asking for help.

Lived experiences of cognitive dissonance in our “advanced” globalised civilisation:

As an autistic therapist working with ND folxs, it is exactly like handing out sunblock to people burning in Hell. our entire society is actively hostile to any person who is not cis, white, het, rich and male. and we are all going to work, buying groceries and dropping the kids at daycare like everything is fine.

I don’t feel good about asking for help, but do feel good about helping others. This is unfair to myself. Second, the large inhuman institutions that make up most of society are not acting in service to humans, but we are asked to see them as human.

My own desire to please and appease others learned before I could speak due to trauma and abuse which happened regularly since I was an infant right through my first marriage. I appease others to avoid their anger or disapproval. The abuse stopped at age 30 when I got therapy to teach me how to be self assertive and make healthy choices. This was not what I had learned growing up or in the relationships I chose before therapy. I stuck to familiar scenarios with no idea I could choose multiple ways to respond to others in any situation. My autistic rigid thinking did not see I had choices. Today’s ” ABA therapy concentrates on teaching small children to please and appease and I see it as dangerous practice to do this. I was abused for much of my young life, taken advantage of by predatory people, etc because I needed to prove to them that I was “good”. After years of conditioning, the immediate response to appeasement/ people pleasing is still a struggle for me to deal with, but at least I mostly refrain from putting myself in danger through extreme appeasement responses. I am fortunate I survived. Getting therapy and better, healthier communication tools to work with saved my life and my sanity.

Living under capitalism and neo fascism as a queer, disabled, autistic person. I frequently have to weigh my own needs, desires, and abilities against the material realities of a society that doesn’t value me.

Working in a caring profession for employers and managers who care primarily for themselves and the organisation.

The biggest source of cognitive dissonance for me is valuing social justice, compassion and equality but being paralysed by my disabilities, anxiety and inability to help sufficiently that I end up not doing anything.

Becoming conscious of human cognitive limits and recognising that these limits are just as real, immutable, and relevant for our survival as the laws of physics may allow us to avoid the fate of earlier civilisations, and to embark on a path of radical energy descent.

You and your friends and colleagues can greatly assist our research by filling in our 8-minute anonymous survey on cognitive dissonance. Many thanks for your participation! 

Healing from anthropocentrism

Worldwide there are many thousands – likely millions of small human scale initiatives to re-conceptualise human societies in comprehensible life affirming ways, as an integral part of the living planet.

I refer to the (re)establishment of radically egalitarian social norms as de-powering. Many of these initiatives have their origins in indigenous communities. Some of the longest running initiatives are facilitated by organisations like Navdanya, by our friends at Local Futures, and by the permaculture movement that was conceptualised and nurtured by Bill Mollison and David Holmgren.

For those who grew up in urban environments and industrialised societies the learning curve can be long and steep.

But collectively we can tap into a wealth of knowledge and timeless indigenous wisdom.

Neurodivergent, indigenous, and otherwise marginalised people depend on each other in ways that differ from the cultural norm – and that is pathologised in hypernormative societies. The endless chains of trauma must be broken.

Join us!

How much cognitive dissonance is in your life?

The Autistic Collaboration Trust has been active in researching cultural and psychological safety from an intersectional perspective. We now explore the level of cognitive dissonance that is generated by the societies that people are embedded in. You are invited to contribute! The results of this research will inform the education services we provide to healthcare professionals and education providers.

As part of the overarching research theme How (the lack of) diversity in the way we collectively think about the future shapes the futures that are (im)possible this project explores the subconscious ideological roots of modern industrialised society and the emotional impact of the modern human predicament.

Cognitive dissonance surfaces whenever human emotional limits are reached. The catch is that those humans who are capable of considering themselves to be culturally well adjusted have a capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance that seems nearly unlimited from an Autistic perspective.

As pointed out in earlier articles, the discipline of economics and the modern belief in the invisible hand are best understood as the foundational beliefs of a cult. More and more people are reaching this conclusion.

In case you remain skeptical and prefer to think of the discipline of financial economics as a social science, the following short talk by John Seed may help you to see the many dogmatic assumptions that are baked into the modern economic discipline. John Seed advocates to replace the religion of economics with a spiritual movement based on the sanctity of the living planet:

Contribute your lived experience to our participatory research

You and your friends and colleagues can greatly assist our research by filling in our 8-minute anonymous survey on cognitive dissonance. Many thanks for your participation! 

The survey explores 21 social scenarios. For each scenario you are asked to think about the following questions 

  1. How do you feel?
  2. How does society expect you to feel?
  3. How do your friends expect you to feel?
  4. How does your life partner expect you to feel?

and choose one of the following answers 

  1. Really bad
  2. Somewhat bad
  3. Neutral
  4. Somewhat good
  5. Really good
  6. Could not do this (for example due to ethical concerns)
  7. Not applicable

The above survey design is new. If you have any questions regarding the survey, or have suggestions for improving the survey, please leave a comment. All feedback is appreciated.

As with all our participatory research, the results will be published via AutCollab.org, and will inform the education services we provide to healthcare professionals and education providers.

Are you able to identify the biggest source of cognitive dissonance in your life? If so, what is it?

Initial answers to this question provide a window into the social world generated by the institutional landscape of modernity. Most of the responses to date are from participants who identify as neurodivergent:

The fact that I am as highly educated as I am and that my skills are so undervalued in a capitalist economy and that I have so little idea how to market myself or make a living in a way that is consistent with my values. How much shame I have around the fact that I depend financially on my elderly parents because I am raising an ND child by myself and parenting has been so hard for me that I have not been able to work in years. That my value as a person is so tied to being able to be productive in a capitalist economy and all the inner work I do and have done throughout my life, and all I do to support my child, counts for nothing.

I don’t really do cognitive dissonance. I’m wide open to myself and the world. It sucks.

I feel bad (because I have been programmed to by my family and society) for being on disability benefits though I strongly believe that basic income and life necessities should be provided to all regardless of their ability to work in the capitalist workforce. 

Sometimes, when it becomes ‘obvious’. Right now, I’m working for the main organization in my country that claims to represent autistic people, but it is not autistic-led… I got here with the idea to change things from the inside as the only autistic activist and advocate… Knowing I might fail, I have to accept being misjudged and many things I know go against my values and dehumanize who I am. Being silent because violence and trauma and wanting to scream all the time because I want others to know the truth about this organization.

I don’t think I have much. I live pretty true to my identity and values and anything from society/others that doesn’t reflect those I keep externalised and boundaried. I’m fortunate there are not ways in my life I have to go against myself. I can walk my talk in all areas of life.

As important as trust is in relationships, my behavior is more on the side of mistrust.

Every day I deal with people who get a larger share of the values they assign to activities, events, people, and customs from what is expected by their social circle and political context than I sense that I do. I see money, jobs, consumerism, and social media groupthink as constructs that serve impersonal systems at the expense of communal connections and individual autonomy.

Ableism. Classism.

In the future, I will die. It will probably be painful and frightening. There will also be times when I will feel that I have failed at some moral obligation, and that will be hellish. But I go through life very lazily and mostly by conforming to comfortable habits instead of by always striving to be my best self and have a good meaningful life. 

Sometimes I need help and I don’t feel like I can ask for it. I feel there is a lot of social stigma around having different or extra needs.

Being alive.

Wanting to trust others and feeling I need to protect myself. 

New purchases and wanting to beautify my wardrobe and home vs discarding old items and how those discarded items affect the environment. I try to donate, resell, or recycle to quell the feelings of discomfort I have with consumerism. I also drive a luxury SUV which I enjoy and feel I deserve, but I do have to quell feelings of materialism and consumerism to enjoy it.

Definitely! The distance between what society expects me to feel and how I actually feel, less so what my friends and life partners expect me to feel. These days it is mainly the sense of shame I am supposed to feel at needing assistance with my basic needs and daily living. But in truth I don’t feel shame! I feel the effects of others’ shame, but I genuinely feel that we all are interconnected and that we will all need help at some point or the other. Note: 1. By society I also include “birth family”, who loom large in my life. 2. Also, I found myself shrugging a lot, like “I don’t know how society expects me to feel” or also like I don’t care what society expects me to feel (Something I imagine many other ND people face). 3. I would also add that I have caste privilege in the country I live in.

I find it harder to ask for help than expected by others. I get more joy out of providing help than might be expected by others.

Feeling useless and worthless for not having capitalistic value as a disabled person, when I believe that everyone has an inherent right to live a comfortable life with all of their needs met.

Reducing cognitive dissonance, catalysing intersectional solidarity

You can join us with your research ideas – and anything else you might want to discuss – at the NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity July 2024.

There is an urgent need to catalyse intersectional neurodiverse and indigenous ecologies of care all over the world. Neurodivergent, indigenous, and otherwise marginalised people depend on each other in ways that differ from the cultural norm – and that is pathologised in hypernormative societies. The endless chains of trauma must be broken.

How (the lack of) diversity in the way we collectively think about the future shapes the futures that are (im)possible

The NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity offer a rich opportunity for omni-directional learning across cultures and geographies. The diversity in the way we collectively think about the future shapes the futures that are possible!

There is an urgent need to catalyse intersectional ecologies of care all over the world, and to expose and oppose the internalised ableism that is holding our societies hostage. The endless chains of trauma must be broken.

Internalised ableism

The two deepest subterranean – i.e. subconscious – ideological roots of modern industrialised society are (a) internalised ableism and (b) ubiquitous cognitive dissonance across all aspects of life.

Internalised ableism manifests in a refusal to fully acknowledge human cognitive limits, and in the misguided and unfounded belief in continuous technological progress powered by human ingenuity and human created technologies, including so-called artificially intelligent systems.

Cognitive dissonance surfaces whenever human emotional limits are reached. The catch is that those humans who are capable of considering themselves to be culturally well adjusted have a capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance that seems nearly unlimited from an Autistic perspective.

At scale, in the social realm, the combination of internalised ableism and a large capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance over extended periods – to the extent that bodily symptoms of chronic dis-ease and stress are ignored and for the most part not associated with cognitive dissonance, is the substrate that perpetuates the paradigmatic inertia of a sick society.

The most dangerous characteristic of a sick society is the normalisation of social power gradients and the aggregate human and non-human harm caused by widespread addiction to various forms of social power across all spheres of life.

The following commentary on the poly-crisis from Chris Hedges, Peter C Downey & Paul Ehrlich comes to mind.

Autistic people are routinely marginalised when they expose social power games and the myth of meritocracy. Pathologisation of Autistic and otherwise neurodivergent people is best understood as the push back from a sick society with cultural norms and expectations that are disconnected from our evolutionary heritage and from the local ecosystems that we are part of.

This article contains many references and examples that expose the “normality” of internalised ableism and cognitive dissonance.

Human cognitive limits

Becoming conscious of human cognitive limits and recognising that these limits are just as real, immutable, and relevant for our survival as the laws of physics may allow us to avoid the fate of earlier civilisations, and to embark on a path of radical energy descent.

It is only once we have understood the extent of internalised ableism within modern industrialised societies that we can begin to comprehend human cognitive limits and the extent to which we are surrounded by anthropocentric hubris.

If we care to look, we can easily find highly concerning examples of human cognitive limits in all the large institutions that define the modern industrialised way of life that is characterised by addictions to consumerism and competitive social games.

The living planet is far more adaptive and creative than any human, far beyond what any of us can understand. No human institution is “in control”. Furthermore, a multitude of waste products of the modern industrialised way of life are having a direct and non-negligible effect on human cognitive abilities and performance.

A good example of a source of self-inflicted cognitive impairment that is widely ignored is the continuous rise in CO2 levels, and the elevated CO2 levels that billions of people are regularly exposed to in indoor environments. The normalisation of spending many hours in crowded offices, classrooms, and other indoor spaces with elevated CO2 levels has led to a significant decline in human cognitive performance. A few quotes from the referenced article, which is only gaining in importance with every year:

… carbon dioxide (CO2) has a direct and negative impact on human cognition and decision-making. These impacts have been observed at CO2 levels that most Americans — and their children — are routinely exposed to today inside classrooms, offices, homes, planes, and cars.

… Significantly, the Harvard study confirms the findings of a little-publicized 2012 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) study, “Is CO2 an Indoor Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-Moderate CO2 Concentrations on Human Decision-Making Performance.”

That study found “statistically significant and meaningful reductions in decision-making performance” in test subjects as CO2 levels rose from a baseline of 600 parts per million (ppm) to 1000 ppm and 2500 ppm… They found that, on average, a typical participant’s cognitive scores dropped 21 percent with a 400 ppm increase in CO2. Here are their astonishing findings for four of the nine cognitive functions scored in a double-blind test of the impact of elevated CO2 levels: The researchers explain, “The largest effects were seen for Crisis Response, Information Usage, and Strategy, all of which are indicators of higher level cognitive function and decision-making.” The entire article is a must-read as is the LBNL-SUNY study.

… All of this new research is consistent with — and actually helps explain — literally dozens of studies in the past two decades that find low to moderate levels of CO2 have a negative impact on productivity, learning, and test scores.

… in recent decades, outdoor CO2 levels have risen sharply, to a global average of 400 ppm. Moreover, measured outdoor CO2 levels in major cities from Phoenix to Rome can be many tens of ppm higher — up to 100 ppm or more — than the global average. That’s because CO2 “domes” form over many cities primarily due to CO2 emissions from traffic and local weather conditions.

… The places where most people work and live — CO2 concentrations are considerably higher than outdoors. CO2 levels indoors that are 200 ppm to 400 ppm higher than outdoors are commonplace — not surprising since the design standard for CO2 levels in most buildings is 1000 ppm. In addition, that differential increases when more people are crammed into a space and when the ventilation is not adequate. As the Harvard researchers point out, in recent decades, buildings have become more tightly sealed, and there has been less exchange of inside air with fresh outside air.

… “In surveys of elementary school classrooms in California and Texas, average CO2 concentrations were above 1,000 ppm, a substantial proportion exceeded 2,000 ppm, and in 21% of Texas classrooms peak CO2 concentration exceeded 3,000 ppm.”

… Interestingly, the authors of all of these studies — the direct CO2 studies and the CO2-as-a-proxy-for-ventilation studies — are generally public health researchers focused on indoor environmental quality (IEQ). As a result, their published work does not examine the implications these findings have for climate policy.

… But the implications for climate policy are stark. We are at 400 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 today outdoors globally — and tens of ppm higher in many major cities. We are rising at a rate of 2+ ppm a year, a rate that is accelerating. Significantly, we do not know the threshold at which CO2 levels begin to measurably impact human cognition.

… Loftness, who oversaw the GSA study, explained that CMU’s analysis showed that “humans are pretty good sensors of high CO2 levels.” Occupant perception of indoor air quality drops sharply as CO2 levels rise from 600 to 750 ppm. She is familiar with the recent work showing a direct link between CO2 and human cognition. She said of the original LBNL-SUNY study, “a seminal piece of work and a great research team.” She considers the Harvard study “an absolutely important study.” Loftness draws two key conclusions from these studies, her own work, and the vast database of scientific literature she has surveyed.

First, the immediate public health message is to increase ventilation and the use of outside air in buildings. And second: We have to do everything we can to keep outdoor CO2 levels below 600 ppm because something serious starts happening then.

No wonder AI is being sold as the “solution” to all our problems.

Human emotional limits

Growing levels of social inequality correlate with a rise in mental health issues throughout the population. The root cause may well relate to the formation of increasingly absurd group identities and associated signals of social status that make it acceptable to exclude the less fortunate.

From evolutionary biology we know that in-group competition has negative group survival value. Humans are using a diverse range of external and visible coping mechanisms for dealing with perceived, anticipated, or experienced lack of safety. The combination of early childhood experiences and individual neurology determines which coping mechanisms come into play in specific situations.

Additionally, the increasingly tangible effects of extreme weather events and ecological collapse are pushing more and more humans towards emotional limits.

However, emotional states such as depression and emotions such as grief have a purpose, they have evolved to force us to reflect deeply on our values, to shed internalised ableism, and to remind us of our capacities for mutual aid and creative collaboration.

The constraints of language and framing

Language and framing play critical roles for maintaining and breaking paradigmatic cultural inertia. A few examples illustrate how the frames of modern industrialised society perpetuate paradigmatic inertia:

  1. The institutional linguistic gymnastics to maintain / get back to busyness as usual in the era of pandemics permeate all aspects of life, including public health communication.
  2. International “trade agreements” – better understood as corporate rights agreements. This is the story of global economic warfare, how colonialism seamlessly morphed into neo-colonialism, and how corporate rights consistently over-power human rights in international trade.
  3. Modern taboos – Yanis Varoufakis reminds us how the institutional landscape has engineered a frame in which Julian Assange’s release sets the precedent for further restrictions on journalism.

Perhaps less well recognised is the way in which the science of biology is affected by modern cultural framing.

Many biologists seem to be unaware of the impact of framing on their thinking. Our understanding of evolutionary processes – including the evolution of non-human cultures, is still very limited.

A few pointers:

Framing evolutionary processes in terms of collaborative niche construction instead of competition remains an under-explored topic. The motivation for collaborative framing is grounded in what we are learning about ecosystems and what we know about the collaborative tendencies of human babies, for example the research by Michael Tomasello on The Origins of Human Collaboration.

Disability

Many with the neurodiversity and disability rights movement are familiar with the social model of disability and with the stigma associated with openly identifying as neurodivergent.

The internalised ableism within our society has multiple detrimental social effects beyond stigma, dehumanising discrimination, and widespread addiction to various forms of social power. For example, Covid continues to cause elevated numbers of hospitalisations, growing numbers of those who suffer from Long Covid, and elevated death rates.

Aotearoa New Zealand currently has more than 1,000 Covid deaths annually according to the published statistics, in spite of high vaccination rates. To put this number in perspective, this is 3 times the number of people that die in traffic accidents in Aotearoa. The risk of dying from Covid is roughly 1/2 the risk of death that motorcyclists expose themselves to voluntarily, but the risk of dying from Covid is largely a matter of public health policy and social norms, and not a matter of personal choice. The odds of acquiring Long Covid and long-term disability are much greater than the risk of dying from Covid, but as pointed out above, in the interest of maintaining paradigmatic inertia, the institutional landscape of the mono-cult has relied on framing to fully “normalise” all risks associated with Covid.

Downplaying the dangers of pandemics like Covid is one of the many consequences of widespread internalised ableism, consistent with the neoliberal framing of cultural evolution in terms of survival of the richest.

Dehumanisation

Once the cult of empire and growth has become hyper-normative, sizeable parts of the population are dehumanised.

The current social operating system amplifies the influence of the opinions and whims of a few people (including algorithms that are designed to act as extensions of these people) by several orders of magnitude. At the same time these people are subject to the same cognitive limits as all humans – if anything they may lack sensitivity and self reflective capacities, not understanding that their influence, amplified to the scale of millions and billions of people invariably causes great harm to large numbers of human and non-human living creatures.

It is a form of collective insanity to allow concentrations of social power.

Within the institutions of a stratified society, the only people who are in a position to change the state of affairs are those few who currently hold positions of highly concentrated social power – but these people are in these positions because they are hopelessly addicted to the most dangerous drug for humans, namely social power.

Rehumanisation

In industrialised societies people don’t understand how Autistic people support each other, love each other, and care for each other in ways that go far beyond the culturally impaired neuronormative imagination.

It is time to remind the so-called “civilised” world about non-pathologising and coherent theories of human ways of being that are integrated into ecologies of care and the evolutionary flows of life in-formation that are being jointly developed within communities of Autistic and otherwise neurodivergent people.

Beyond the human

In his excellent book How Forests Think – Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human Eduardo Kohn elaborates how humans are not only part of an ecology of care, capable of nurturing relationships that extend far beyond humans, but he also reveals the fundamental patterns of semiosis and thought that are inherent to all forms of life, at all levels of scale.

The European conceptualisation of the individual human ego is a product of the misguided metaphor of society as a profit generating machine. A shift to ecosystems of human scale groups reduces the spurious complexity needed to support a monoculture, and it retains and even grows adaptive cultural complexity, i.e. the diversity that emerges when the human ecological footprint is aligned with bioregional ecosystem functions. Adaptive complexity saves energy – it is the result of humans engaging in collaborative niche construction as a part of biological ecosystems.

The delusion of control

Authoritarianism

The technocratic approach to “digital governance” across the Anglosphere is a good illustration of how to create an illusion of freedom and democracy by presenting the world beyond the ruins of empire as a “threat”. Here is a good piece of investigative journalism:

Part 1: What started as a scheme to check the identities of a few thousand asylum seekers has spiraled into a vast network of data about everyone who comes and goes from the ‘Five Eyes’ nations.

Part 2: Before anyone had even imagined the controversial AUKUS pact, New Zealand had quietly accumulated membership of some 36 ‘Anglosphere’ networks.

I love the closing comment: 

South China Morning Post columnist Alex Lo is one to have put the situation into stark relief.

“The West will soon be sharing their citizens’ biometric data,” Lo wrote. “If you already think China’s state surveillance is intrusive and dystopian, you have not yet seen the brave new world that is just over the horizon.”

Human scale ecologies of care

The Permaculture Designer’s Manual that Bill Mollison wrote in 1988 spells out the disease of modernity in very clear and simple words – and it offers deep timeless wisdom for co-creating living systems that are conducive to life, i.e. for collaborative niche construction. Bill Mollison wrote in a refreshing and life affirming way, not in any way deterred by the modern insanity he saw around him. From the many astute observations he made about industrialised society, to me it is obvious that Bill Mollison was Autistic. What’s amazing is how much ecological knowledge he was able to curate and pass on to future generations. Much of this he seems to have picked up very early, as a young person, growing up in rural Tasmania, in a richly diverse ecological and partially non-commodified context. A few examples of the down-to-earth principles and guidelines documented by Bill Mollison:

Principle of Cooperation: Cooperation, not competition, is the very basis of existing life systems and of future survival.

A Policy of Responsibility (to relinquish power): The role of beneficial authority is to return function and responsibility to life and to people; if successful, no further authority is needed. The role of successful design is to create a self-managed system.

Policy of Resource Management: A responsible human society bans the use of reseources which permanently reduce yields of sustainable resources, e.g. pollutants, persistent poisons, radiocatives, large areas of concrete and highways, sewers from city to sea.

Principle of Disorder: Any system or organism can accept only that quantity of a resource which can be used productively. Any resource input beyond that point throws the system or organism into disorder; oversupply of a resource is a form of chronic pollution.

Principle of Stability: It is not the number of diverse things in a design that leads to stability, it is the number of beneficial connections between these components.

Types of Niches: Niche in space, or “territory” (nest and forage sites). Niche in time (cycles of opportunity). Niche in space-time (schedules).

Information as a Resource: Information is the critical potential resource. It becomes a resource only when obtained and acted upon.

In our society the fiction of homo economicus manifests itself in the beliefs associated with the language of behaviourism, which exists in multiple dialects, and which has come to permeate and pollute many disciplines in the social sciences:

  • Leaders, authorities, managers, superiors, social power gradients
  • Leadership, demands, commands
  • Management, measurement, control
  • Incentives, aversives, punishments
  • Business, tasks, busyness
  • Standards, norms, benchmarks, unwritten rules
  • Conformance, compliance, obedience

The journey towards a healthier relationship with the ecosystems which we are part of starts with the most powerful tool at our disposal, the introduction and consistent use of new language and new semantics.

The delusion of leadership

The failure to acknowledge human cognitive limits not only leads to dangerous addictions to social power and social status symbols, it also leads to extreme levels of contextual ignorance and dangerous levels of perceived cultural superiority.

Life is a highly dynamic system. Reflecting deeply on the relational nature of life allows us to become reacquainted with human emotional limits. As was well understood by Daoist philosophers 2,500 years ago, and as reiterated by Bill Mollison in the foundational permaculture principles, powered-up relationships, including the cult-ivation of leaders are inherently incompatible with healthy ways of being human.

All social power gradients systematically dampen feedback loops, they constitute a collective learning disability. Economists Arjun Jayadev and Samuel Bowles describe the effort needed to maintain social power structures as guard labour. Guard labour is wage labour and other activities that are said to maintain (hence “guard”) a system. Things that are generally characterised as guard labour include: management, guards, military personnel, and prisoners. Guard labour is noteworthy because it captures expenditures based on mistrust and does not produce future value.

Note that the concept of a “flat hierarchy” is an oxymoron. Either you tolerate social power gradients or you don’t.

Along the way of de-powering all relationships, we begin to re-appreciate the limits of human comprehensibility and sense making. The following conversation between Dougald Hine, Bayo Akomolafe, Stephen Jenkinson & Vanessa Andreotti provides a good introduction to life in the compost heap of industrialised civilisation.

Agency at human scale

Available archaeological and anthropological evidence points towards highly egalitarian social norms within human scale (i.e. small) pre-civilised societies. In such societies social norms against wielding power over others would have allowed the unique talents and domain specific knowledge of Autistic people be recognised as valuable contributions.

In a psychologically safe environment at human scale (up to Dunbar’s number of around 150 people) the Autistic inability to maintain hidden agendas becomes a genuine strength that creates a collaborative advantage for the entire group.

Our society faces the unprecedented challenge of making a transition towards significantly different values within a single generation. This is the real challenge, rather than finding our way back to a state of “normal” that only ever worked for a very small minority. Here is a beautiful cosmolocal collection of voices from our friends at Local Futures from all corners of the planet:

The NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity – July 2024

The awesomeness of life lies beyond control. The NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity offer a rich opportunity for omni-directional learning across cultures and geographies.

There is an urgent need to catalyse intersectional neurodiverse and indigenous ecologies of care all over the world. Neurodivergent, indigenous, and otherwise marginalised people depend on each other in ways that differ from the cultural norm – and that is pathologised in hypernormative societies. The endless chains of trauma must be broken.

Join us!

The diversity in the way we collectively think about the future shapes the futures that are possible!

Decolonising education

Image from https://indigenousx.com.au

The April NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity catalysed a range of conversations, with many threads weaving through the topic of education. Several topics resulted in in-depth discussion and new emerging ongoing collaborations, which is beautiful to see. Changes towards a more egalitarian culture that deeply and fully appreciates cultural, biological, and ecological diversity are changes that improve the lives of all people, re-align humanity with our evolutionary heritage, and help us nurture sacred relationships beyond the human.

The quarterly NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity offer a space for omni-directional learning in Open Space. The quarterly cadence provides room for distilling, sharing, and fermenting results between workshops. This article offers a synopsis of conversations in April 2024, as part of an ongoing Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, and Internalisation (SECI) knowledge creation spiral. Important topics can be picked up again in July, with new energy and proper attention!

Many thanks again for all your contributions to this event!

NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity – April 2024

The Autistic experiences of modern day colonialism

What can the Neurodivergent community in the West do to support healing?

The Autistic experiences of modern day colonialism. What can the Neurodivergent community in the West do to support healing?

Two experiences need to be highlighted:

  1. That of the autistic observer
  2. That of the autistic lived experience- the more important point.

The Autistic experience cannot be talked about without framing it within anti racism. DisCrit (Dis/ability Critical Race Studies) needs to be more widespread in our academic and professional fields.


Pathologization of neurodivergence and institutional racism in the context of identity and diagnosis (self or otherwise) can be considered as a part of neo-colonialism, in a similar way to the gender spectrum, which became a gender binary.


The persistent big differences in life expectancy between countries and between population segments tell the story of global economic wars – and they also include examples of countries with relatively low “economic performance” with lower levels of inequity and excellent primary healthcare services, where life expectancy is less than 5 years from countries with the highest life expectancy.


I propose an amended version of the Bronfenbrenner’s Social Model of Disability.


It is thinking about how we can meet people where they are at (means, spoons, etc.). I think it would be great (one day, somehow) to have a work group where neurodivergent people could regularly meet to come up with realistic mini actions for dismantling white supremacy. I’m doing a reading group right now, where the focus is prison/police abolition. It’s useful because there is discussion around how we can all take daily tiny actions towards this incredibly daunting eventual goal of abolition. An idea that has come up frequently is establishing communities of care, which is certainly something that AutCollab possess in spirit.


I can recommend the writings of Indrajit Samarajiva.


Industrialisation introduced an artificial distinction between “paid” work and “the rest of life”. This “great idea” has been exported globally and has led to many problems. It has meant that people have come to accept horrible conditions at work. I try to understand social problems in terms of how much out of sync cultural practices are with our evolutionary human scale heritage. For this I use a visual language for describing wellbeing.

Education and how disabled groups can work together

This is an important question that was proposed and a complex topic that we did not get to discuss in April. This topic weaves through many AutCollab articles, and through the lived experience reports and results that are emerging from our participatory research. The NeurodiVerse Days of Intersectional Solidarity could be one crystallisation point for intersectional collaboration. We are seeing it in the active conversations we are having around replacing / transforming the Western education system.

Nurturing diversity in humans and non-human nature – bringing the two together

See for example Ren Hurst’s writings.

How to find and create a network within my community after coming back from being abroad for 6 years

It’s not easy, I wouldn’t try directly to create a network. IMHO, I’d say you have to try and find an action that could reward you all, like organising a party, an event or simply an interview about an article you want to write. I think this last solution is a “good” one because it’s a case-by-case approach and each person will probably feel differently about your absence. Or maybe contact them one by one and check their reaction? Just to say that I’m an amateur when it comes to friendship.


One of the challenges most of us face is local isolation due to our relatively small numbers (we are a small minority) and due to the stigma and lack of active local support for Autistic community formation. Hence the AutCollab initiative to co-create centres of Autistic culture. I have since relocated to a smaller city, but this topic is on my “take action this year” list of things to do. I intend to start a conversation with the local council and the local library about this topic, and perhaps in combination with a local in-person NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity event to get started.

Non-violent communication

I fell in love with Rogerian active listening, NVC, How to Talk So Kids Will Listen And Listen So Kids Will Talk, P.E.T. etc. When I started supporting other people in learning to facilitate Self-Directed Education for young people, I recommended that they also go study one or more of these. Some of them also found this enormously helpful. A few, did not. They told of bad experiences with these approaches. When I listened, I discovered that it’s not the tool you use, it’s what you do with it. All can be weaponised. Especially when a person already experiences challenges with formulating and expressing through the spoken word it’s so easy to use these styles to dominate from a place of ‘moral high-ground’. I started excavating for the common DNA behind these approaches. I call it Horizontal Communication. I like to say it’s not how you communicate, it’s why you’re communicating. Intent is key. Www.horizontalcommunication.org outlines the basics.

I’d love to hear from other people here what your own experience is/has been.

And have any of you encountered “Clean Language” facilitation?


This is such an important topic! I like to use the term De-powered Dialogue to refer to the kind of conversations and ways of communication that are needed for omni-directional learning and genuine compassion – the mutual deep desire to understand a precious living being. Let us compare notes. See these notes on cultural and psychological safety and this article on de-powered dialogue.

Yes, the intent makes all the difference. As Autistic people we communicate to better understand and help one another. But in powered-up industrialised societies we learn the very hard way that we live in a culture in which communication is often used for deceptive purposes, to the point where a leading “autism researcher” and no shortage of neo-Darwinian social scientists and biologists consider the capacity for “flexible deception” to be a foundational and beneficial human trait, no recognising that this capacity is largely if not entirely a product and symptom of a sick culture. This takes me back to the very first post that encapsulates the motivation for establishing the AutCollab.org website.


I looked up Clean Language. It seems to have some similarity with the techniques for creative collaboration. It works beautifully if people genuinely trust each other and are curious about the other.

Things get difficult as soon as social power dynamics are present or can’t be excluded, which, speaking from painful experience 🙂 is what consistently trips up Autistic people. As soon as one party feels entitled to some form of social power, communication seizes to be honest and transparent. Things get especially tedious when the other party(ies) openly reject being subject to coercive demands / techniques. Two AutCollab articles come to mind:

What would small ecologies of care look like?

See this new specific page on this topic.

So far my ecology of care has mostly been limited to remote collaborations and 12 years of operating an egalitarian worker co-op where we share the burden of interfacing with the external world. This is an important piece of a much bigger picture.

I now live on a plot of land with two households that are collaborating on establishing a food forest, and I am learning a lot. My experience in this local aspect of ecologies of care is currently still less than 12 months, but I am immensely enjoying the experience. I love Vandana Shiva’s work, and I am delighted to now be in a position to put it into practice and adapt it to the local context. The egalitarian worker co-op experience comes in extremely handy. Now the learning can focus on the ecological aspects beyond the human.

Also, over the last 5 years or so, my focus has shifted more and more towards de-powering collaboration between human scale groups. We know how to operate small egalitarian worker co-ops, and we also have plenty of experience in interfacing with the powered-up external world. My learning is now centred around the question of how to help other small groups to transition to egalitarian worker co-op models or to catalyse the formation of such groups. We arrived at our specific worker co-op model 12 years ago as a result of another 10 years of learning from somewhat more traditional ways of operating, for example, in the early days we made the big mistake of thinking that a financial investor could help us become more established.

Now I am also interested in the ways of collaboration and non-monetary mutual aid that emerge locally, between households. This is so important. I see it as a way of incrementally and increasingly reducing the toxic levels of commodification and financialisation in our societies. These are active steps towards de-growing the “economy” and replacing it with an ecology of care!

The emerging threads of discussions this month prompted me to put together a curated list of public education resources that attempts to weave together all of the threads. Further links and insights shared in these conversations will find their way into future articles and into emerging ongoing collaborations between participants.

Questioning the neuronormativity of friendship. What is friendship for an autistic person?

I’d like you to answer three questions:

(1) What is friendship to you?

Thanks for opening up this conversation. This is a good question. I want to think, to be able to provide a succinct answer that also highlights the limits of what we can put into words. Linear language is such a limited tool 🙂


I can’t answer succinctly either, I’m using two approaches that (I think) complement each other to arrive at a vague definition: complementation through otherness -> the projection of the non-self, the satisfaction of implementing a collective holotropic understanding of the world, sustained in time.

This is about care and love as well.

But more simply, I use these words: otherness, non-self, collective, holotropism, joy, sustainable, care, love

(2) What is not friendship?

Individualism, reward circuit, comradeship.


I am not sure why ‘comradeship’ is excluded, as the word is somewhat synonymous with friendship?

(3) How does friendship with, or between, autistic people differ from neuronormative friendship?

I’m thinking about neuronormative expectations from the Western world. If you wish, there will be a second stage during which we will use your answers to guide the process of creation (to be defined collectively).

I’ve read a few academic studies but, unsurprisingly, they deal with what makes autistic people difficult friends. Further reading:

Changing the lived realities within children’s education spaces as a necessary foundation for cultural evolution

I’d like to discuss changing the lived realities within children’s education spaces as a necessary foundation for cultural evolution. I’m watching kids in Self-Directed Education grow up with substantially less trauma – it’s making a big difference. “Pathological Demand Avoidance” provides a litmus test for non-coercive education.

It took me ages to recover from schooling, and the masking it took just to survive. The SDE kids seem more authentic, seem to have a level of self-integrity I’m still acquiring in my mid 50s. My son just turned 18 and he’s already wiser than me in many ways…


I presume you are referring to approaches such as described by The Alliance for Self-Directed Education, right? This is very much the approach that I advocate. I went to school and university, but mostly I am self taught and have learned a lot by facilitating peer-to-peer learning, learning from and with others.

Much of my work with organisations within the so-called economy has been the context of collective learning. My role in particular tends to be one of knowledge archaeologist, facilitator of de-powered dialogue, and visual language co-creator. In this context typically I work with adults, with domain experts from various fields, who have come together in a transdisciplinary space to address a wicked problem.

Anecdotally, from my experience, looking back over 30 years, it seems many people within corporations and government departments have become increasingly afraid to share insights, ask uncomfortable questions, and talk openly about the limits of their knowledge and understanding, in line with what W E Deming was already observing in the 1980s.

I was not aware of the SDE Alliance. This can be helpful in our efforts to educate teachers and other educators. Many thanks! I have discovered the ecoversities network which aims to reclaim diverse knowledges, relationships and imaginations to design new approaches to higher education, which operates in the space of collective learning across all age groups, and is primarily focused on adults.

There are also valuable insights to be gained from various approaches to continuous improvement, especially practises that assist indoctrinated adults to relearn how to share knowledge and learn from each other. All such approaches involve getting people to temporarily pretend that social power gradients don’t matter. This observation led to the egalitarian neurodiventure co-op model and to the realisation that all forms of “powered-up” relationships are toxic.

Persistent Demand for Autonomy (PDA) is a healthy reaction to a powered-up traumatising social environment.

I am keen to learn from your experiences!


This is so fascinating as I had not known about this Self-Directed Education initiative, though its theory is at the core of the work that I do as a school psychologist. Thanks so much for sharing!! I find that SDE is highly in line with Dr. Ross Greene’s Collaborative and Proactive Solutions model: Lives in the Balance. I usually recommend its approaches when working with students who I suspect are PDA.

How would you say SDE differs from traditional Montessori schools? The impression I get is that Montessori schools generally still operate as regular schools under the illusion of self directed learning, whereas true SDE establishments truly focus on full autonomy without imposing an educator’s (or society’s) views during the learning process. Are outdoor or nature schools the same things as SDE? I am hearing about many “outdoor preschools” pop up all around my area.


I’m on the Ecoversities WhatsApp group but mostly lurking as my time is very full so I prioritise carefully – So far this space seems more promising, grin.

Montessori is what we call Progressive rather than SDE, and forest schools vary widely – some are SDE, some are not even Progressive. The bottom line is whether an adult is ultimately attached to their own idea of what a child needs to learn, or whether the adult is able to fully respect the child’s autonomy and step back into a genuine assistant role.

Here’s a good article on Progressive vs SDE.

My younger child is a PDAer. My experience is that SDE is ethically appropriate and helpful for all kids, deeply liberating for Neurodivergent kids and 100% necessary for PDAers. The defining feature of SDE is not in the way the child learns e.g. curriculum, project based, free exploration or whatever. The defining feature is that the child is the genuine decision maker.

I love Ross Greene, although my experience is that PDA doesn’t respond well to any communication that is in any way formulaic. The principles need to be internalised and then the communication can be more natural. Even asking Whatsup can become a demand if used more than once.

Please send teachers my way if they’re interested. I make my living training adults in SDE Facilitation. Teachers have a harder time than non teachers though, as they have so much to unlearn, and they often struggle vocationally making the shift because they’ve often been attracted to teaching because they need to feel useful and central and it’s hard to become peripheral. Many teachers really enjoy the creativity that goes into getting a disinterested person to engage with prescribed content. SDE does not attempt, in fact carefully avoids, trying to manipulate attention.


Many thanks for sharing your experiences. Perhaps we can collaborate in educating teachers. One aspect we try to emphasise is that neurodivergence is not limited to children. For schools, providing a safe environment for all staff is just as important as providing a safe environment for the students.

The emerging threads of discussions this month prompted me to put together a curated list of public education resources that attempts to weave together all of the threads. Further links and insights shared in these conversations will find their way into future articles and into emerging ongoing collaborations between participants.


You make me wish I had more time to explore this rabbit hole. Thank you for this. I will dip in as I can and am saving links. Right now I’m figuring out effective emancipation strategies in the face of oppressive draft legislation around school education in South Africa. Everything you say in the article above applies…


Thank you so much for your thoughtful response. The article you provided was further clarifying, but I also found your distinction very helpful. I think you opened up a whole other rabbit hole for me to explore when I have the spoons so I truly appreciate that!

To one of your points about teachers having so much to unlearn, I find it is the same in the field of ABA, at least here in America. In addition to the need to feel helpful and need for control, I feel like a lot of ABA therapists also may be autistic themselves and perhaps make a living of how to help others like them. This is exactly how I would also describe my experience entering the field of school psychology. The problem becomes, however, that the systems we have in place aren’t complementary to these ideas we are talking about and so we are systematically training teachers and ABA therapists alike, who may have completely the right intentions, how to indoctrinate neurodivergent students into this transactional world that is not built for anyone except the privileged, truly. Public education was designed to indoctrinate, not to educate, so I am afraid as hard as educators might try, the system just doesn’t work.

Happy to discover there are several in my state and one SDE school in particular near me. I am currently working in public education to pay school loans but am constantly investigating alternate options given my skill set- I feel my job in general shouldn’t exist in the sense that special education should not have to exist (i.e. as in SDE schools), but I think there is value in identifying educational “profiles” with respect to identifying an individual’s needs and omni-directionally problem-solving (student learns from mentor and mentor learns from student) to navigate effective ways around barriers.


I find that the topic of PDA relates directly to The fifty-seventh chapter of the Dao De Ching. PDA can be understood as the result of our bodyminds leading us to the healthy insight of letting go of internalised ableism – to stop playing the [hypernormative social] game. This insight is very old. Yet it seems to be an insight that is missing, or at the very least subordinated to dogmatic, coercive systems of beliefs in capitalism and in many monotheistic religions. This chapter of the Dao De Ching is a beautiful reminder of human scale limitations, an antidote to anthropocentric myths of superiority.


I am host to a small group busy finalising a Declaration of Educational Rights that we started work on in 2020 and that I strategically need to complete this month, and one of the clauses to be written this weekend concerns neurodivergence. The placeholder so far reads:

“Article 7: Should deal with neurodivergence to be de-pathologised and neurotypical norms shall not be imposed.”

Your input would be welcomed. Please let me know if you’d like to see the full document for context.


Yes, please share details. The Design Justice Network is possibly related or a source of ideas for adaptation to your context of education.


As part of engaging with our database of teachers we’ve just put out a new ongoing survey, with a focus on experiences in education environments. The survey is very similar to the one we use to assess psychological and cultural safety in other aspects of life.

It will be valuable to hear first hand accounts from within the web of political constraints of the neoliberal Overton window academia. Because of the severe constraints, there is a need for independent research.

This is one of the reasons why ongoing AutCollab participatory research is so important. We are not institutionally constrained in terms of the questions that we are asking. We invite everyone to contribute and also to suggest useful questions and research agendas that are relevant for neurodivergent communities. At the same time we are open to exploring collaboration with aligned academics, on condition that AutCollab is the custodian of the research data, so that we can consult with Autistic communities when putting together a research agenda, before granting academic researchers within the established [neoliberal] system access to any data we are gathering.

Reflections

The NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity offer a rich opportunity for omni-directional learning across cultures and geographies, bringing into focus the chasm between the life affirming ecologies of care and the life destroying busyness of the global mono-cult.

Omni-directional learning framed in the language of ecologies of care is at the core of all Autistic collaborations.

The topics of omni-directional learning and conceptual framing are close to my heart. George Lakoff offers a good introduction to the role of framing in language and thought – please note that some of the linguistic examples of frames and metaphors provided apply to Western cultures and to the English language, they are part of WEIRD psychology and do not translate one to one to other cultures and languages.

The abstract categories of frames and metaphors are foundational for understanding symbolic thought.  Autistic culture evolves at human scale, by sharing lived experiences in Neuroqueer Learning Spaces – like the NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity.

We can only fully understand and undo (neo)colonialism by reframing the social world without using the masters tools.

It is learning how to take our differences and make them strengths. For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us temporarily to beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change.
– Audrey Lorde, Black, lesbian, feminist, socialist, mother, warrior, poet

Great examples of decolonising frames are found in the following episodes of The Moanan podcast, which acts as a bridge, connecting indigenous pacific knowledge holders and scholars to descendants of the Moana, living in diasporas today:

  1. Indigenous Pacific voyaging/navigation
  2. The migration from South East Asia into the Moana

The sacred oneness of life

The (neo)colonial perspective denies the oneness of life, and relies on framing the evolutionary process of life as a competitive game, which culminates in an anthropocentric notion of progress, rather than in terms of ecologies of care beyond the human, which are part of a regenerative cycle of life bound by planetary biophysical limits.

Cultural framing determines whether competitive or collaborative motives are the primary drivers of social interaction, and by implication, whether competitive or collaborative motives are understood and treated as secondary drivers.

Anyone who has ever worked with agent based models and simulations knows that confusing first order effects and second and higher order effects results in radically different behaviours. Depending on which cultural framing prevails, and depending on the degree to which human collaborative tendencies and ecological frames are not only denied, but also actively discouraged and pathologised, we can distinguish four basic categories of human societies:

There is a good reason for ecology having become a discipline in its own right. To this day the dominant frames in the discipline of biology remain entangled with a paternalistic capitalist ideology. David Sloan Wilson has done some good work on multi-level group selection and dual inheritance, but he is still trapped within the Western frame of technological “progress”.

When you are doing the right thing for the earth, she gives you great company.
– Vandana Shiva

Cultural framing and individual sensitivity profiles define the relative priorities of competitive or collaborative motives. The evolution of the human capacity for language and culture, as well as results from experiments with small children indicate that collaborative intentions dominate prior to socialisation.

Re-humanising neurodivergence

In times when social paradigms have become toxic, more and more people subconsciously suffer from cognitive dissonance. Autists and the Arts play an essential role in allowing cognitive dissonance to surface and be shared in explicit form, in ways that transcend words, simplistic linear narratives, and established paradigms.

A♾tistic : Autistic, Artistic, and other ways of being that deviate from hypernormativity. 

We are the utopian dreamers.
The invisible pioneers.
The vulnerable change-makers.
The compassionate healers.
We are the creative pathfinders.
The quiet adventurers.
The accidental discoverers.

Re-humanising learning

Conventional education ignores the priorities of basic human needs.

Conventional education aims to try and get the child to learn stuff, and then now that we’re focusing on getting the child to learn stuff we want to try and add some mental health stuff on top, where we kind of also try to make them feel a bit competent and have good relationships but that’s secondary.

Self-directed Education Works exactly the other way around: we start by focusing on meeting those core needs so that we have a strong thriving person because after that things tend to happen fairly naturally because especially with PDA there is that drive for Mastery that drive for competence um that desire to do things well and when there’s enough.

From Why is Self-Directed Education so ideal for PDA?

Within the neurodiversity paradigm PDA is understood as a healthy response to a hypernormative, oppressive (neo)colonial cultural context, it is referred to as a Persistent Demand for Autonomy.

CARDS = Competence, Autonomy, Relatedness, Dignity, and Safety

When these core needs of Competence, Autonomy, Relatedness, Dignity, and Safety are met for any human being, you’re going to have a state that is leaning more towards thriving, and to the extent that these core needs are not being sufficiently met, you’re going to have a person struggling no matter what their neurotype.

From Why is Self-Directed Education so ideal for PDA?

Within modern industrialised cultures, those with uncommon sensitivity profiles and a distinctly reduced capacity for maintaining cognitive dissonance, especially over longer periods of time, increasingly receive pathologising and stigmatising diagnoses such as autism spectrum disorder, pathological demand avoidance, and oppositional defiant behaviour.

The key question: Who is benefitting from stigma and from labels that pathologise individuals? The obvious answer: Established institutions of social power within modern industrialised cultures – in other words, the institutional landscape that perpetuates (neo)colonialism. In this context the corporate neurodiversity-lite attempt of co-opting of the language of the neurodiversity paradigm reveals itself as an exercise in perception management, and as a tool for subordinating neurodivergent people to the oppressive system of control of the mono-cult.

Pathologising and dehumanising individuals for not conforming to the factory model of industrialised society has become a core practice of neo-colonialism, alongside the perpetuation of deadly wars, including deadly economic wars across the artificial national boundaries conceived by colonial powers.

Assigning pathologising labels to individuals allows the institutional landscape of (neo)colonialism to marginalise all those who openly resist subordination to the mono-cult, including those who are not already part a marginalised minority group or an “underdeveloped economy”. Modern hypernormative practices of dehumanisation are specifically designed for perpetuating social power gradients in a globalised world, irrespective of national boundaries.

Furthermore hypernormative practices and values in the digital era increasingly devalue all forms of biological life, and are deeply entangled with the goals of eugenics and the suicidal narrative of linear and ultimately unlimited technological progress:

Pathologising labels facilitate the “free” unlimited imposition of demands from self-declared cultural authorities on those who are considered insignificant by the mono-cult. In this context the institutional landscape of cultural authorities relies on the internalised ableism of parents, educators, and medical professionals to perpetuate the mono-cult. Internalised ableism is the Achilles Heel of the mono-cult.

Educating parents, educators, and medical professionals about the lived experiences of neurodivergent people is an important tool for exposing the harm perpetuated by the mono-cult. Intersectional solidarity, Autistic culture, and Persistent Demand for Autonomy are part of a healthy cultural immune response towards the life destroying mono-cult.

Changes towards a more egalitarian culture that deeply and fully appreciates cultural, biological, and ecological diversity are changes that improve the lives of all people, re-align humanity with our evolutionary heritage, and help us nurture sacred relationships beyond the human.

Onwards! Together. In good company.

Small is good, small is all

I borrowed this fitting one-liner from The small things Manifesto, a work in progress, a living document, written and compiled by Andrew Roach. A quote from the introduction:

Many of the major technological and cultural innovations of the last several hundred years have served to flatten the world, eliminate or obviate distance, and bring us closer together as people. Printing, transportation, telephone, radio, television, home video, and the internet have each, in their own way, made our impact on the world bigger, and made parts of the world smaller.

But this came at a price.

Technology is not a net good, or even a neutral force. Technology is a Force Multiplier. It reshapes the world to fit the vision of those who design it, regulate it, and wield it. Oil companies poison our lakes and rivers, slowly boiling our planet. Facebook tracks everything we do online and uses that data to make us miserable. Disney owns an outsized portion of modern folklore. The FCC decides who gets to launch a radio station, and under what circumstances. Television turns reasonable people in to rabid fans of raving monsters, and turns raving monsters in to celebrities, politicians and thought leaders.

It does not have to be this way.

It is this way thanks to a combination of factors, most of which can be summarized as “The Profit Motive.” For some companies, making people angry is a surefire way to drive Engagement, and driving Engagement is a surefire way to make money. For other companies, the money lies in controlling our access to our own culture, gatekeeping who is allowed to tell stories, and when, and how. For these major corporations, there is no incentive to Help, to Improve. There’s no money in making the world a better place.

It will not be easy.

Most new technologies, but especially Digital technologies, experience a period between inception and corporatization during which they florish as a result of a bunch of disparate people with distinct goals who Explore the space that the technology creates, often without regard for profit of any kind, or at least with some motivation beyond pure profit. Then there is, usually, a period of contraction and consolidation around the things that have made the most money (or, in the case of television, have had the most Regulatory support from the corrupt FCC) and you’re left with HBO/DISCOVERY, Disney, Facebook, and Joe Rogan.

But we can reject the profit motive!

Local theater still happens, in spite of the fact that it stopped being profitable ~100 years ago. Local music still happens, in spite of the fact that only 1 band in 100 is going to make their living making music, and significantly fewer than that are ever going to Make It. Small creators make video games in their spare time because they enjoy it. Hundreds of people work together to run free and open alternatives to major social media networks, funded out of their own pockets.

Ars Enim Mutare; Art for change

These things happen in isolation, from creators who make things because the want to make things. They toil, often in isolation, for little reward. This is a call to action for solidarity, and support and intentional creation. We can reshape the world, and support one another as we do it. We can opt out of activities that enrich corporations that seek to make us suffer or to destroy us. We can (and must) become our own media.

The key element that holds together all the threads, which has been systematically eroded in Westernised societies: the notion of trust, including the role of trustworthy, sacred relationships within the context of human scale ecologies of care beyond the human.

Composting money and power

Money and social power gradients are abstract cultural artefacts designed to defy compostability – social conventions that we can accept or reject, which are perpetuated by careless and learning disabled societies – creating conditions that are literally hostile to all life.

The main purpose of the traumatising indoctrination system of the mono-cult is to override the above fact with the myth that social power gradients are a law of nature and the myth that money is essential for coordinating human affairs in so-called “advanced” societies.

The best way to expose these two misguided myths is by providing counter-examples. There is no shortage of indigenous societies that had no need for money. If we look carefully, we can even find small scale examples that persist to this day. Similarly, if we care to look closely enough, we can find small scale examples of radically egalitarian societies that persist to this day.

Autists easily get into trouble by speaking truth to the illusion of power, and by refusing to contribute to ethically questionable ventures in exchange for money. Many of us are considered uncontrollable, i.e. unemployable by organisations that operate as a pyramidal social power structure.

Life creates conditions conducive to life. – Janine Benyus

This simple ecological truth tells us so much about life and about healthy life giving cultures. It encapsulates the observation that all living beings are compostable, integrated into the sacred cycle of life by decomposing into the building blocks of life.

Money as a social carcinogen

The global fungibility of money results in carelessness.

The notion that everything has a price and that everything can be substituted by an “equivalent” service is misguided.

  • We can’t survive without oxygen – oxygen and clean air are non-fungible. Polluted air makes us sick.
  • We can’t survive without nutritious food – nutrients are non-fungible. Junk food makes us sick.
  • We can’t survive without love and care – trustworthy long-term relationships are non-fungible. Social isolation and social power gradients make us sick.
  • etc.

Communal wellbeing is incompatible with the tradeoffs and social norms that emerge from engaging in competitive markets – especially in “free” global markets that prioritise the free flow of capital over all ecological concerns of the living world.

When the tradeoffs become invisible externalities, out of sight & out of mind thanks to global supply chains and 1-click® consumer culture, it is easy to become addicted to the convenience of money – to the delusion of fungibility.

Money is a non-compostable abstraction that violates the sacred cycle of life.

The abstraction of money creates an illusion of permanence that distracts from our impermanence, and from the wonder of being alive, the wonder of being part of the sacred cycle of life. The concept of money is entangled with:

  • An anthropocentric sense of superiority.
  • The denial of death.
  • The perpetuation of social power gradients across generations.

The construction of money as interest bearing debt turns it into a highly addictive drug.

The notion of interest bearing debt amplifies the non-compostable quality of money – it literally defies death – it grows automagically by design, and its growth is not constrained by any biophysical limits. Interest bearing debt:

  • Is at the heart of capitalism and the so-called economic system, which is anything but economising – by design it optimises for maximum busyness, for maximum consumption of energy and resources; it is addictive for culturally “well adjusted” social status conscious human primates.
  • Ensures that not only everything has a price, but that everything is available as a potential object for financial speculation – applying this idea recursively has led to multi-level financial derivatives, turning money into the most dangerous and addictive drug for human primates.

Given the ecological destruction we have unleashed, it is time to grieve and mourn, time to learn, and time to resist.

We have created a dystopian social world that is obsessed with “winning”, in which nothing is ever enough. The desire to win is not healthy, it is a deadly, addictive, and dehumanising collective learning disability.

The actual effect of the myth of meritocracy, which is used to normalise and rationalise head to head competition, is a consistent bias to over-represent capabilities, and to actively avoid thinking about externalities.

I recently read ‘The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in An Age of Diminishing Expectations’ (Christopher Lasch, first published in 1979), written in the year when neoliberalism got “installed” by Margaret Thatcher in the UK, apparently a very popular book at the time. Our institutional landscape has learned nothing over the last 45 years. Below are a few quotes from the book. Nothing has changed: 

Michael Maccoby describes the new corporate leader, not altogether unsympathetically, as a person who works with people rather than with materials and who seeks not to build an empire or accumulate wealth but to experience “the exhilaration of running his team and of gaining victories.” He wants to “be known as a winner, and his deepest fear is to be labeled a loser.” Instead of pitting himself against a material task or a problem demanding solution, he pits himself against others, out of a “need to be in control.” As a recent textbook for managers puts it, success today means “not simply getting ahead” but “getting ahead of others.” 

He has little capacity for “personal intimacy and social commitment.” He feels little loyalty even to the company for which he works. One executive says he experiences power “as not being pushed around by the company.” In his upward climb, this man cultivates powerful customers and attempts to use them against his own company. “You need a very big customer,” according to his calculations, “who is always in trouble and demands changes from the company. That way you automatically have power in the company, and with the customer too. I like to keep my options open.” A professor of management endorses this strategy. “Overidentification” with the company, in his view, “produces a corporation with enormous power over the careers and destinies of its true believers.” The bigger the company, the more important he thinks it is for executives “to manage their careers in terms of their own . . . free choices” and to “maintain the widest set of options possible.”‡

According to Maccoby, the gamesman “is open to new ideas, but he lacks convictions.” He will do business with any régime, even if he disapproves of its principles. More independent and resourceful than the company man, he tries to use the company for his own ends, fearing that otherwise he will be “totally emasculated by the corporation.” 

In all his personal relations, the gamesman depends on the admiration or fear he inspires in others to certify his credentials as a “winner.”

bureaucracy has made life predictable and even boring while reviving, in a new form, the war of all against all. Our overorganized society, in which large-scale organizations predominate but have lost the capacity to command allegiance, in some respects more nearly approximates a condition of universal animosity than did the primitive capitalism on which Hobbes modeled his state of nature. Social conditions today encourage a survival mentality, expressed in its crudest form in disaster movies or in fantasies of space travel, which allow vicarious escape from a doomed planet. People no longer dream of overcoming difficulties but merely of surviving them. In business, according to Jennings, “The struggle is to survive emotionally”—to “preserve or enhance one’s identity or ego.” The normative concept of developmental stages promotes a view of life as an obstacle course: the aim is simply to get through the course with a minimum of trouble and pain.

A warlike society tends to produce men and women who are at heart antisocial. It should therefore not surprise us to find that although the narcissist conforms to social norms for fear of external retribution, he often thinks of himself as an outlaw and sees others in the same way, “as basically dishonest and unreliable, or only reliable because of external pressures.” “The value systems of narcissistic personalities are generally corruptible,” writes Kernberg,

The cult of personal relations, which becomes increasingly intense as the hope of political solutions recedes, conceals a thoroughgoing disenchantment with personal relations, just as the cult of sensuality implies a repudiation of sensuality in all but its most primitive forms. The ideology of personal growth, superficially optimistic, radiates a profound despair and resignation. It is the faith of those without faith.

The upwardly mobile corporate executive “does not view himself as an organization man.” His “anti-organizational posture,” in fact, has emerged as his “chief characteristic.” He advances through the corporate ranks not by serving the organization but by convincing his associates that he possesses the attributes of a “winner.”

As the object of the corporate career shifts “from task-orientation and task-mastery to the control of the other player’s moves,” in the words of Thomas Szasz, success depends on “information about the personality of the other players.” The better the corporate executive or bureaucrat understands the personal characteristics of his subordinates, the better he can exploit their mistakes in order to control them and to reassert his own supremacy.

the successful bureaucrat survives not by appealing to the authority of his office but by establishing a pattern of upward movement, cultivating upwardly mobile superiors, and administering “homeopathic doses of humiliation” to those he leaves behind in his ascent to the top.

More than twenty-five years have passed since David Riesman argued that the transition from the “invisible hand” to the “glad hand” marked a fundamental change in the organization of personality, from the inner-directed type dominant in the nineteenth century to the other-directed type of today.

essential aspects of the new man: his eagerness to get along well with others; his need to organize even his private life in accordance with the requirements of large organizations; his attempt to sell himself as if his own personality were a commodity with an assignable market value; his neurotic need for affection, reassurance, and oral gratification; the corruptibility of his values.

Beneath the concern for performance lies a deeper determination to manipulate the feelings of others to your own advantage. The search for competitive advantage through emotional manipulation increasingly shapes not only personal relations but relations at work as well; it is for this reason that sociability can now function as an extension of work by other means. Personal life, no longer a refuge from deprivations suffered at work, has become as anarchical, as warlike, and as full of stress as the marketplace itself. The cocktail party reduces sociability to social combat. Experts write tactical manuals in the art of social survival, advising the status-seeking partygoer to take up a commanding position in the room, surround himself with a loyal band of retainers, and avoid turning his back on the field of battle.

Advertising serves not so much to advertise products as to promote consumption as a way of life. It “educates” the masses into an unappeasable appetite not only for goods but for new experiences and personal fulfillment.

As Daniel Boorstin has pointed out, we live in a world of pseudo-events and quasi information, in which the air is saturated with statements that are neither true nor false but merely credible.

The bureaucracy not only provides supposedly reliable information to high officials; it provides misinformation to the public. The more technical and recondite this product, the more convincing it sounds. Hence the pervasiveness, in our culture, of the obfuscatory jargon of pseudo-science. This language surrounds the claims of administrators and advertisers alike with an aura of scientific detachment. More important, it is calculatedly obscure and unintelligible—qualities that commend it to a public that feels informed in proportion as it is befuddled.

The degeneration of politics into spectacle has not only transformed policy making into publicity, debased political discourse, and turned elections into sporting events in which each side claims the advantage of “momentum,” it has also made it more difficult than ever to organize a political opposition. When the images of power overshadow the reality, those without power find themselves fighting phantoms.

The book reminds me of what W Edwards Deming wrote and said about “management” a few years later, and of André Spicer’s academic article ‘Playing the Bullshit Game: How Empty and Misleading Communication Takes Over Organizations’ 40 years later.

On the margins of society the number of people who have serious concerns about the toxicity of money is growing.

A society that uses money never grows up, and remains forever ignorant of its limitations. Together with money, the notions of investment and philanthropy are also completely broken. By neglecting deeper analysis of the polycrisis, they contribute to the perpetuation of the problems caused by money.

In a social world in which everything has been commodified, for a number of reasons, phasing out the use money overnight is not a viable option – addicts are experts at kicking the can down the road. It is time to sober up.

Sobering up

By framing the harm and the trauma responses caused by the life destroying global mono-cult in terms of addictions, we can begin to comprehend the magnitude of the wound that modernity has inflicted on the living planet.

The delusion of technological progress is feeding the addiction to various forms of convenience and consumption – this keeps us perpetually busy and it distracts us from our human natures.

The delusion of the self is feeding the addiction to various forms of social power – this “normalises” carelessness and deceptive forms of communication, and it allows our latent capacity for establishing dominance hierarchies to override our innate human collaborative tendencies towards mutual aid.

To sober up we need to acknowledge all our fears, face the pain, and turn fears into courage:

  1. Fully letting go of the delusion of the self – exiting the cult of the self. This includes letting go of all the internalised ableism that permeates modern social norms, and weaning ourselves off all of the addictions that stand in the way of committing to sacred relationships within an ecology of care beyond the human.
  2. Fully letting go of the delusion of technological progress – exiting the cult of busyness. This includes incrementally weaning ourselves off all the conveniences afforded by the availability of fossil fuels.

Most importantly, we must acknowledge that we can not regain sobriety alone, in self-isolation, and we can only relearn to be fully human at a scale that is compatible with our biological cognitive and emotional limits, neither at smaller scales, nor at larger scales.

Composting money

One viable approach for gradually phasing out the use of money would be a collective social agreement to prevent central banks from “printing” further money, and to attach a negative interest rate to all money (debt) that is currently in circulation. Negative interest rates can not only catalyse urgently needed initiatives to reduce the human ecological footprint, they also significantly reduce if not eliminate the toxic addictive quality of money. The miracle of Wörgl, described in detail in Bernard Lietaer’s books, is a good example.

Within the S23M worker co-op, we also make use of negative interest rates to address temporary differences in cashflow needs between individuals that may arise due to specific life circumstances. The mechanism allows members to grant a ‘trust extension’ to a member with a temporary need for additional money. We use the term trust extension instead of ‘loan’ or ‘debt’, as there is no predetermined repayment schedule, and as the interest rate is negative. Those granting the ‘trust extension’ have trust in the recipient, and the negative interest rate eliminates financial speculation/exploitation.

When a currency with negative interest rate is combined with a policy commitment to prevent “printing” further money, the result is (a) a strong incentive for those who own financial capital to lend it to those who are working on important transformational initiatives, and (b) an incremental reduction of the money that is in circulation, eventually converging towards zero. The overall result can be understood as “composting” the money that is in circulation into life giving initiatives, with a number of benefits along the way:

  1. Elimination of the impossible, cruel, and life destroying expectation of a positive “return on investment” on a finite planet within a social context of ecological overshoot.
  2. Providing a gradual path for recovering capitalists to reintegrate into the local ecological context, and to refamiliarise themselves with ecological and biophysical constraints.
  3. Providing a gradual path for ethical entrepreneurship within ecological and biophysical constraints.
  4. Providing time for people to (re)learn the art of de-powered dialogue, slowly reestablishing trustworthy relationships, even within societies that are currently plagued by high levels of inequality.
  5. The incremental approach provides time to co-create and nurture de-commodified human scale communal social arrangements, thereby incrementally moving away from the social myopia caused by a one-dimensional anthropocentric metric.
  6. The negative interest rate catalyses ‘trust extensions’ for ethical entrepreneurship.
  7. (Re)localisation, as in the absence of positive abstract financial return, investors will benefit most from investing into local initiatives that tangibly improve communal wellbeing – including the wellbeing of the investor.
  8. Over time, as the use of money converges towards zero, digital systems can be refocused from tracking monetary flows towards tracking the flows of physical resources, and waste, including flows of energy – measured in physical units, resulting in meaningful and actionable metrics related to ecological health.

The above proposal may seem radical, but anyone who takes more than a few minutes to reflect will have to conclude that it offers an incremental pathway towards egalitarian human scale cultural organisms that is designed to not leave anyone behind. All we can do is sow seeds. We are not in control. We have to trust the big cycle of life that is far beyond human comprehensibility and beyond human control.

We can all start locally, within our own social context.

The biggest obstacle is the widespread addiction to various forms of social power amongst those who currently own financial capital, which in most cases includes an addiction to the expectation of monetary “return on investment”. This leads us to the need for composting social power gradients, which involves systematically tackling addictions to social power.

Composting power

Reducing social power gradients is at the heart of all social movements and at the heart of revolutions. Daoist philosophy offers the best advice on this topic that I am aware of. There is no quick fix. We are dealing with the toxic paradigmatic inertia of super human scale institutions, and with inmates who are paralysed by fear, and, to varying degrees, are addicted to convenience and various forms of social status within the social pyramid scheme.

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” ― Buckminster Fuller

This is all that we can do – trusting in human scale, catalysing ecologies of care, and learning from and with each other, which is actually quite a lot!

Many of us are stuck in survival mode. We need to slow down, to the relational speed of life. By definition no one is able to do this in isolation. It also can not be achieved by training. It requires lived experience, imagining alternative de-powered social operating models, and educating ourselves in critical thinking tools and de-powered forms of transdisciplinary collaboration

Along the way we can offer palliative care to dying institutions, and advice on possible exit path for inmates who are ready to confront their addictions to the status quo.

Therapy and beyond in a Post-WEIRD world

We are inviting neurodiversity and disability rights activists, Autistic psychotherapists and other Autistic health professionals, indigenous rights activists and scholars, as well as Buddhist and Daoist scholars. All these perspectives are highly valuable for the conversations and the omni-directional learning that is needed in these times.

Over the last 3 years, as a result of writing about Autistic ways of being and Autistic culture, and especially since the publication of The Beauty of Collaboration at Human Scale, I am having more and more conversations with Autistic and otherwise neurodivergent psychotherapists, as well as with neurodivergent health professionals from a broad range of disciplines.

As to be expected, Autistic health professionals have the same urgent need for peer support and mutual aid as other Autists, and the same applies to health professionals from other marginalised groups.

AutCollab is committed co-creating a comprehensive support model for Autists and otherwise neurodivergent and intersectionally marginalised people that is grounded in our collective lived experience, informed by what we are learning from the results of our ongoing participatory research.

The lived experiences of those Autists who spend many of their waking hours assisting other Autists constitute a repository of valuable knowledge and insights. The lived experiences I am curating from conversations within the AutCollab community seem to be appreciated by many neurodivergent therapists and former neurodivergent therapists, and are shaping the AutCollab Ecologies of Care support model for neurodivergent and intersectionally marginalised people.

Below is the list of topics that have been submitted for the NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity this month. I am looking forward to seeing which topics participants will dive into!

  1. The Autistic experiences of modern day colonialism. What can the Neurodivergent community in the West do to support healing?
  2. Support for Autism, how to find and create a network within my community that I just came back from being abroad after 6 years.
  3. Navigating the political research landscape, when you don’t have a map or a guide, only a moral compass.
  4. Neurodiversity and psychedelics.
  5. Neurodiversity affirming group therapy.
  6. Neurodiversity affirming psychiatry.
  7. How to recover from autistic burnout?
  8. How medical providers can provide a safe and affirming environment tailored to strengths and challenges of autistic thinkers to help them more effectively meet their goals.
  9. Anti-imperialism; Afropessimism x “Marxism” (Marx hated the term); or the idea that the subjugation of Africa precipitates Capitalism, not the other way aroundGender Abolition: Investigating for ANY progressive origin of gender in any societyReclamation of “Disorder”: When Order is Hegemony.
  10. Autistic community, challenging social norms, education of young neurodiverse students.
  11. Time to listen to each others stories and to be heard. Can be focused on challenges we face, where we find joy, or be more free form.
  12. Education and how disabled groups can work together.
  13. Nurturing diversity in humans and non-human nature – bringing the two together.
  14. Non-violent communication.
  15. What would small ecologies of care look like?
  16. Register and add your topic!

Based on recent conversations with several neurodivergent therapists, I would like to add the title of this article, Therapy and beyond in a Post-WEIRD world, as an additional topic to explore.

According to our glorious leaders in government and industry, the Western world is still Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic. But on the growing margins of society, hardly anyone believes this anymore. Rather the Western world has been heavily indoctrinated, increasingly de-industrialised, the gaps between rich and poor are widening, and democracy has become a spectacular form of elite performance theatre.

It is completely unsurprising that the demand for peer support and mutual aid is going through the roof, and that the mental health of marginalised people is in a correspondingly bad state.

How does psychotherapy fit into this picture?

The modern disciplines of psychology and psychiatry are a product of the European industrial era, focused on helping people to cope with the mental burden and cognitive dissonance that is generated by having to function – or pretending to be functioning – as a cog in the industrialised machine. The problems of alienation are as old as industrialisation. Karl Marx is famous for writing extensively about it.

After decades of outsourcing and offshoring, many of the so-called rich nations are no longer heavily industrialised in the classical sense of producing material goods. Instead, many people work in the so-called service sector, and many of those who have attained higher levels of indoctrination, i.e. certified professionals, work in bullshit jobs. Those performing such jobs know that their job is entirely meaningless, and in many cases, that it actively contributes to the modern human predicament.

This is the result of an oxymoronic “economic” system that literally optimises for the appearance of busyness. This is not a joke, and many Autistic and otherwise marginalised people are fully aware of this fact.

The specific challenge that mental health professionals face is a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) that reflects the cultural bias of Post-WEIRD “normality”, in which sanctified bullshit is the informational fuel that runs the so-called economy. The psy disciplines, being an integral performative part of the economic system, have resulted in a therapy industry that is heavily dependent on a steady stream of “clients”.

The therapy industry is most developed in the Anglosphere, and especially in the United States. Many therapists and psychiatrists have the best intentions, and genuinely want to help people, but whatever assistance they provide, at the latest when patients are sent back into the economic engine to “perform” in the mono-cult that is liquidating the living planet, they will again suffer from predictable mental health problems.

Mental health professionals want to help, yet can only offer very temporary assistance and emergency relief. At the same time, especially if they are neurodivergent, they often find themselves in situations that mirror the impossible situations they encounter amongst their patients, including lack of psychological and cultural safety in the work environment.

Furthermore, many marginalised neurodivergent people, irrespective of their line of work and expertise, tend to be locally isolated – they are not embedded in a supportive ecology of care of trustworthy family and friends. These considerations have led to the multiple human scale time horizons, which are integral to the Ecology of Care support model:

Time horizons relevant for human wellbeing

Depending on the context of a specific situation, one or more of the following time horizons may be relevant for our mental health and for supporting each other within an ecology of care:

Acute Emergency: Focus on the here and now, to complement emergency mental health support, to listen to those in distress, and help them regain the capacity to engage in mutual aid networks.

Surviving: Focus on the here and now, on the mutual aid needed to cope on a daily basis, within the current social operating model.

Evolving/de-powering: Focus on the year(s) ahead, to rediscover the beauty of collaboration at human scale and the timeless patterns of human limitations.

Thriving: Focus on the 7 generations ahead, integrating lived experiences from the last 7 generations, to participate in comprehensible local ecologies of care beyond the human, and to live meaningfully, compassionately, and courageously no matter what.

Humans evolved to have most of their social and wellbeing needs met via relationships at human scale and smaller, across all four time horizons. We can visualise our relationships as an evolving system of concentric Circles of Care.

  1. Intimate partner
  2. Household
  3. Human scale ecology of care / whānau / extended family
  4. Bioregional ecology of care
  5. Planetary ecology of care

Perpetually stuck in survival mode

The capitalist conception of society as individuals and households has literally atomised our ecologies of care (hint: “nuclear” family) to create new opportunities for markets and capital to extract greater levels of profit from the social fabric. Healthy extended multi-household families functioning as a mutual aid network and economising unit simply don’t provide optimal leverage points for maximising GDP growth and for coercing everyone into artificial busyness and consumption.

Nuclear families and atomised societies are essential for the “wellbeing” of the industrialised machine, but as it turns out, counterproductive in terms of human wellbeing and the health of bioregional and planetary ecosystems.

As an added bonus, the resulting chronic mental and physical health conditions have led to entire new industries of over-worked health professionals. The Autism Industrial Complex exemplifies the underlying intent: anyone who does not meet the exacting industrial definition of the standard Human® as demanded by Capitalism Inc, receives a pathologising label and is subjected to traumatising “normalisation” treatment.

Ubiquitous mental distress and traumatised populations set the scene for the psychotherapy industry. Everyone is desperate for assistance, but even the best assistance that is on offer within the system keeps people trapped in survival mode – because there simply is no exit from the toxic mono-cult.

Re-creating or co-creating healthy human scale ecologies of care, i.e. entire ecologies of healthy enduring relationships, lies far beyond the capabilities of health professionals and psychotherapists, who are as entrapped in the toxic bigger social system as everyone else.

The time horizon of Capitalism Inc is limited to quarterly financial results, and the time horizon of WEIRD politicians and governments extends as best to 3 or 4 year election cycles, roughly on par with the job hopping cycle of obedient Human® cogs in the industrial machine.

A culture that has no institutions that attend to the basic human need for stable ecologies of care across multiple generations is a deeply sick culture.

(Re)opening space for breathing, thinking, and solidarity

How do we glue atomised societies back together into healthy ecologies of care beyond the human? This is not something that we learn in school or in our universities. This is something that we need to figure out together, at human scale, in an adequately safe environment, which is not something that any industry or government provides – it is also something we need to co-create.

One useful technique that I can draw on is 24 years of experience in facilitating Open Space, which is a minimalist practice of self-organisation of people who have come together to address one or more wicked problems. In my experience Autistic people take to Open Space like fish to water, because there is no one who pretends to be “in control”, and because everyone is actively encouraged to spend their time in a place where they are either learning or contributing to the learning of others – and to use their two feet as needed to remain in such a place throughout the workshop. Also, Open Space tends to consist of small groups of between 2 and 7 people. An experienced facilitator will encourage larger groups to divide into smaller groups and then reconvene for short periods in a larger circle to share (intermediate) results.

You can experience Open Space by joining the NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity.

We have adapted Open Space to online environments that offer multiple communication modalities, including text only. Furthermore, we accommodate asynchronous communication by allowing people to contribute over the course of four weeks, whenever they have the time and the spoons to do so.

However, a person who is currently finds themselves in an acute emergency or is struggling in survival mode, at risk of slipping into an emergency situation, won’t be able to benefit from Open Space, and may need a less stimulating and dynamic environment to relearn how to feel safe in a small group context. This is where Autistic psychotherapists can offer valuable experience from group therapy settings.

One possible way of integrating Open Space with group therapy settings is to offer one or more streams of group therapy alongside dynamic Open Space break out groups.

In-person NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity?

A month ago I was asked whether I would be interested in perhaps organising and co-ordinating a retreat for Autistic therapists. This fits well with what I had been discussing locally with Autistic friends in terms of local / regional community building – we are thinking of organising a meeting amongst Autistic activists in Aotearoa. I now live on a plot of land where there is some space to organise meetings, including two small houses and a 50 sqm workshop (shed). Our two households are collaborating on growing food locally, and we are planting a little food forest.

For a multi-day workshop of Autistic activists and therapists, including from overseas, I could organise accommodation in the nearby hotels or AirBnBs. Depending on how many people are interested, we can expand the venue to a suitable hotel in the small city here. To get everything organised, and to give all of us adequate time to prepare, fit the event into our calendars, and book travel, I am thinking that perhaps September or October 2024 would be a good target to aim for. Of course we can also offer ways of contributing remotely for those who are unable to attend in person.

For such an in-person retreat / workshop, I would propose Catalysing healthy ecologies of care beyond the human as the overarching theme, with Therapy and beyond in a Post-WEIRD world as the sub-title.

I am looking forward to jointly developing this idea during the NeurodiVerse Days of Solidarity this month (April)! All your ideas and input are welcome!

The theme and the timing fits well with our plans for incrementally rolling out and jointly refining the AutCollab Ecologies of Care support model for neurodivergent and intersectionally marginalised people. You are encouraged to review the current outline of the model and contribute your ideas and experiences.

Registration of Interest : Catalysing Ecologies of Care

If you would like to participate in an in-person retreat in Aotearoa on the theme of catalysing healthy ecologies of care beyond the human sometime later this year, please register interest below.

We are inviting neurodiversity and disability rights activists, Autistic psychotherapists and other Autistic health professionals, indigenous rights activists and scholars, as well as Buddhist and Daoist scholars. All these perspectives are highly valuable for the conversations and the omni-directional learning that is needed in these times.

Go back

Registration of interest sent.

Many thanks for your interest! We will keep you posted and will let you know when the dates are finalised, and you can book your participation.
Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning
Availability(required)
Warning
Warning
Attendance preference(required)

Warning
Communication preferences(required)
Warning
Warning
Warning.

Onwards!